Effects of Sweeping Jet Actuator Parameters on Flow Separation Control.

M. Koklu
{"title":"Effects of Sweeping Jet Actuator Parameters on Flow Separation Control.","authors":"M. Koklu","doi":"10.2514/1.J055796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A parametric experimental study was performed with sweeping jet actuators (fluidic oscillators) to determine their effectiveness in controlling flow separation on an adverse pressure gradient ramp. Actuator parameters that were investigated include blowing coefficients, operation mode, pitch and spreading angles, streamwise location, and size. Surface pressure measurements and surface oilflow visualization were used to characterize the effects of these parameters on the actuator performance. 2D Particle Image Velocimetry measurements of the flow field over the ramp and hot-wire measurements of the actuator's jet flow were also obtained for selective cases. In addition, the sweeping jet actuators were compared to other well-known flow control techniques such as micro-vortex generators, steady blowing, and steady vortex-generating jets. The results confirm that the sweeping jet actuators are more effective than steady blowing and steady vortex-generating jets for this ramp configuration. The results also suggest that an actuator with a wider jet spreading (110 vs. 70 degrees) placed closer (2.3 vs. 7 boundary layer thickness upstream) to the flow separation location provides better performance. Different actuator sizes obtained by scaling down the actuator geometry produced different jet spreading. Scaling down the actuator (based on the throat dimensions) from 6.35 × 3.18 mm to 3.81 × 1.9 mm resulted in similar flow control performance; however, scaling down the actuator further to 1.9 × 0.95 mm reduced the actuator efficiency by reducing the jet spreading considerably. The results of this study provide insight that can be used to design and select the optimal sweeping jet actuator configuration for flow control applications.","PeriodicalId":80384,"journal":{"name":"AIAA student journal. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics","volume":"18 1","pages":"100-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"44","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIAA student journal. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J055796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

Abstract

A parametric experimental study was performed with sweeping jet actuators (fluidic oscillators) to determine their effectiveness in controlling flow separation on an adverse pressure gradient ramp. Actuator parameters that were investigated include blowing coefficients, operation mode, pitch and spreading angles, streamwise location, and size. Surface pressure measurements and surface oilflow visualization were used to characterize the effects of these parameters on the actuator performance. 2D Particle Image Velocimetry measurements of the flow field over the ramp and hot-wire measurements of the actuator's jet flow were also obtained for selective cases. In addition, the sweeping jet actuators were compared to other well-known flow control techniques such as micro-vortex generators, steady blowing, and steady vortex-generating jets. The results confirm that the sweeping jet actuators are more effective than steady blowing and steady vortex-generating jets for this ramp configuration. The results also suggest that an actuator with a wider jet spreading (110 vs. 70 degrees) placed closer (2.3 vs. 7 boundary layer thickness upstream) to the flow separation location provides better performance. Different actuator sizes obtained by scaling down the actuator geometry produced different jet spreading. Scaling down the actuator (based on the throat dimensions) from 6.35 × 3.18 mm to 3.81 × 1.9 mm resulted in similar flow control performance; however, scaling down the actuator further to 1.9 × 0.95 mm reduced the actuator efficiency by reducing the jet spreading considerably. The results of this study provide insight that can be used to design and select the optimal sweeping jet actuator configuration for flow control applications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扫射射流执行器参数对流动分离控制的影响。
利用射流驱动器(射流振荡器)进行了参数化实验研究,以确定其在逆压梯度斜坡上控制流动分离的有效性。研究的执行器参数包括吹气系数、操作模式、俯仰角和扩散角、流向位置和尺寸。采用表面压力测量和表面油流可视化来表征这些参数对执行器性能的影响。在选择的情况下,还获得了斜坡上流场的二维粒子图像测速和执行器射流的热线测量。此外,还将扫描射流执行器与其他众所周知的流动控制技术(如微涡发生器、定常吹气和定常涡发生器)进行了比较。结果表明,在这种坡道结构下,掠射射流致动器比稳定吹气射流和稳定涡生成射流更有效。结果还表明,靠近流动分离位置(上游边界层厚度2.3 vs 7)的执行器具有更宽的射流展布(110度vs 70度),可以提供更好的性能。通过缩小致动器的几何尺寸得到不同的致动器尺寸,产生不同的射流扩散。缩小执行器(基于喉道尺寸)从6.35 × 3.18 mm到3.81 × 1.9 mm导致类似的流量控制性能;然而,将致动器进一步缩小到1.9 × 0.95 mm会大大减少射流扩散,从而降低致动器的效率。本研究的结果提供了可用于设计和选择流量控制应用的最佳扫射射流执行器配置的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Active Flow Control on Vertical Tail Models. Influence of a Backward-Facing Step on Swept-Wing Boundary-Layer Transition. Volterra Kernels Assessment via Time-Delay Neural Networks for Nonlinear Unsteady Aerodynamic Loading Identification. Azimuthal Variation of Instabilities Generated on a Flared Cone by Laser Perturbations. Effects of Sweeping Jet Actuator Parameters on Flow Separation Control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1