A comparison of two methods to determine the susceptibility of sawtoothed grain beetle (Oryzaephilus surinamensis) populations to pirimiphos-methyl from Canterbury, New Zealand

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences New Zealand Plant Protection Pub Date : 2019-07-27 DOI:10.30843/NZPP.2019.72.308
J. Drummond, R. Chapman
{"title":"A comparison of two methods to determine the susceptibility of sawtoothed grain beetle (Oryzaephilus surinamensis) populations to pirimiphos-methyl from Canterbury, New Zealand","authors":"J. Drummond, R. Chapman","doi":"10.30843/NZPP.2019.72.308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Resistance of sawtoothed grain beetle (Oryzaephilus surinamensis) to organophosphate insecticides is documented internationally. There are anecdotal reports of reduced efficacy in New Zealand but to date no empirical assessments have been made. Two-laboratory-based test methods using either a dust (Actellic® Dust) or liquid (Actellic® 50EC) formulations of pirimiphos-methyl, were compared to determine the response of five Canterbury sawtoothed grain beetle populations. A mini-silo method employed grain treated with the recommended application rate (200 g a.i./tonne seed) of pirimiphos-methyl dust. A Petri-dish method treated internal surfaces of 50-mm diameter Petri dishes with liquid pirimiphos-methyl at concentrations from 0–0.1 g a.i./L to determine an estimated LC50 (lethal concentration for 50% mortality) for each population. The rank order of mortality (highest to lowest) in the mini-silo test was similar to the Petri-dish LC50 rankings for the five populations tested. The results illustrate variation in responses to pirimiphosmethyl concentrations by sawtoothed grain beetle populations, indicating both methods are potential options for future resistance testing and will aid the development of management strategies for control of stored insect pests.","PeriodicalId":19180,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand Plant Protection","volume":"09 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand Plant Protection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30843/NZPP.2019.72.308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Resistance of sawtoothed grain beetle (Oryzaephilus surinamensis) to organophosphate insecticides is documented internationally. There are anecdotal reports of reduced efficacy in New Zealand but to date no empirical assessments have been made. Two-laboratory-based test methods using either a dust (Actellic® Dust) or liquid (Actellic® 50EC) formulations of pirimiphos-methyl, were compared to determine the response of five Canterbury sawtoothed grain beetle populations. A mini-silo method employed grain treated with the recommended application rate (200 g a.i./tonne seed) of pirimiphos-methyl dust. A Petri-dish method treated internal surfaces of 50-mm diameter Petri dishes with liquid pirimiphos-methyl at concentrations from 0–0.1 g a.i./L to determine an estimated LC50 (lethal concentration for 50% mortality) for each population. The rank order of mortality (highest to lowest) in the mini-silo test was similar to the Petri-dish LC50 rankings for the five populations tested. The results illustrate variation in responses to pirimiphosmethyl concentrations by sawtoothed grain beetle populations, indicating both methods are potential options for future resistance testing and will aid the development of management strategies for control of stored insect pests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种方法对新西兰坎特伯雷稻谷甲虫(Oryzaephilus surinamensis)种群对甲基吡啶磷敏感性的比较
国际上已有文献报道锯齿谷甲虫(Oryzaephilus surinamensis)对有机磷杀虫剂的抗性。有传闻说新西兰的疗效下降,但迄今为止还没有进行实证评估。采用粉尘(Actellic®dust)或液体(Actellic®50EC)配方的两种基于实验室的测试方法进行比较,以确定五种坎特伯雷锯齿谷物甲虫种群的反应。采用小仓法,稻谷采用推荐施用量(200克a.i./吨稻谷)处理的稻谷。采用皮氏培养皿法,用浓度为0-0.1 g a.i./L的甲基腈磷液体处理直径为50 mm的皮氏培养皿的内表面,以确定每个种群的估计LC50(50%死亡率的致死浓度)。在小筒仓试验中,死亡率的等级顺序(从高到低)与培养皿LC50排名相似。结果表明,锯齿谷甲虫种群对吡磷甲酯浓度的反应存在差异,表明这两种方法都是未来抗性测试的潜在选择,并将有助于制定储存性害虫控制管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Zealand Plant Protection
New Zealand Plant Protection Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Insect Science
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: New Zealand Plant Protection is the journal of the New Zealand Plant Protection Society. It publishes original research papers on all aspects of biology, ecology and control of weeds, vertebrate and invertebrate pests, and pathogens and beneficial micro-organisms in agriculture, horticulture, forestry and natural ecosystems of relevance to New Zealand.
期刊最新文献
Potato mop-top virus: knowledge review, and evaluation of the biosecurity response to ‘incursion’ of this virus in New Zealand Fungi found in association with discoloured wood of kiwifruit vines in New Zealand Conifer samara structure diverges across the height of the tree crown Evaluating the densities and distribution of root-lesion nematodes (Partylenchus spp.) in wheat grown in Canterbury, New Zealand Testing Trichoderma species as biological agents for control of Dothistroma septosporum in Pinus radiata
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1