Greenhouse gas observation network design for Africa

A. Nickless, R. Scholes, A. Vermeulen, Johannes Beck, A. López-Ballesteros, J. Ardö, U. Karstens, M. Rigby, V. Kasurinen, K. Pantazatou, Veronika Jorch, W. Kutsch
{"title":"Greenhouse gas observation network design for Africa","authors":"A. Nickless, R. Scholes, A. Vermeulen, Johannes Beck, A. López-Ballesteros, J. Ardö, U. Karstens, M. Rigby, V. Kasurinen, K. Pantazatou, Veronika Jorch, W. Kutsch","doi":"10.1080/16000889.2020.1824486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract An optimal network design was carried out to prioritise the installation or refurbishment of greenhouse gas (GHG) monitoring stations around Africa. The network was optimised to reduce the uncertainty in emissions across three of the most important GHGs: CO2, CH4, and N2O. Optimal networks were derived using incremental optimisation of the percentage uncertainty reduction achieved by a Gaussian Bayesian atmospheric inversion. The solution for CO2 was driven by seasonality in net primary productivity. The solution for N2O was driven by activity in a small number of soil flux hotspots. The optimal solution for CH4 was consistent over different seasons. All solutions for CO2 and N2O placed sites in central Africa at places such as Kisangani, Kinshasa and Bunia (Democratic Republic of Congo), Dundo and Lubango (Angola), Zoétélé (Cameroon), Am Timan (Chad), and En Nahud (Sudan). Many of these sites appeared in the CH4 solutions, but with a few sites in southern Africa as well, such as Amersfoort (South Africa). The multi-species optimal network design solutions tended to have sites more evenly spread-out, but concentrated the placement of new tall-tower stations in Africa between 10ºN and 25ºS. The uncertainty reduction achieved by the multi-species network of twelve stations reached 47.8% for CO2, 34.3% for CH4, and 32.5% for N2O. The gains in uncertainty reduction diminished as stations were added to the solution, with an expected maximum of less than 60%. A reduction in the absolute uncertainty in African GHG emissions requires these additional measurement stations, as well as additional constraint from an integrated GHG observatory and a reduction in uncertainty in the prior biogenic fluxes in tropical Africa.","PeriodicalId":22320,"journal":{"name":"Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology","volume":"30 1","pages":"1 - 30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16000889.2020.1824486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Abstract An optimal network design was carried out to prioritise the installation or refurbishment of greenhouse gas (GHG) monitoring stations around Africa. The network was optimised to reduce the uncertainty in emissions across three of the most important GHGs: CO2, CH4, and N2O. Optimal networks were derived using incremental optimisation of the percentage uncertainty reduction achieved by a Gaussian Bayesian atmospheric inversion. The solution for CO2 was driven by seasonality in net primary productivity. The solution for N2O was driven by activity in a small number of soil flux hotspots. The optimal solution for CH4 was consistent over different seasons. All solutions for CO2 and N2O placed sites in central Africa at places such as Kisangani, Kinshasa and Bunia (Democratic Republic of Congo), Dundo and Lubango (Angola), Zoétélé (Cameroon), Am Timan (Chad), and En Nahud (Sudan). Many of these sites appeared in the CH4 solutions, but with a few sites in southern Africa as well, such as Amersfoort (South Africa). The multi-species optimal network design solutions tended to have sites more evenly spread-out, but concentrated the placement of new tall-tower stations in Africa between 10ºN and 25ºS. The uncertainty reduction achieved by the multi-species network of twelve stations reached 47.8% for CO2, 34.3% for CH4, and 32.5% for N2O. The gains in uncertainty reduction diminished as stations were added to the solution, with an expected maximum of less than 60%. A reduction in the absolute uncertainty in African GHG emissions requires these additional measurement stations, as well as additional constraint from an integrated GHG observatory and a reduction in uncertainty in the prior biogenic fluxes in tropical Africa.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非洲温室气体观测网络设计
摘要针对非洲地区温室气体(GHG)监测站的优先安装和改造问题,进行了网络优化设计。该网络进行了优化,以减少三种最重要的温室气体(CO2、CH4和N2O)排放的不确定性。利用高斯贝叶斯大气反演实现的百分比不确定性减少的增量优化,导出了最优网络。二氧化碳的解决方案是由净初级生产力的季节性驱动的。N2O的解决方案是由少数土壤通量热点的活动驱动的。不同季节CH4的最优解是一致的。所有二氧化碳和一氧化二氮的解决方案都在中非的基桑加尼、金沙萨和布尼亚(刚果民主共和国)、敦多和卢班戈(安哥拉)、佐姆萨姆·塔曼(喀麦隆)、阿曼(乍得)和恩纳胡德(苏丹)等地设置了站点。这些站点中的许多都出现在CH4溶液中,但在非洲南部也有一些站点,例如阿默斯福特(南非)。多物种最优网络设计方案倾向于使站点更均匀地分布,但将新的高塔站集中在10ºN和25ºS之间。由12个站点组成的多物种网络对CO2、CH4和N2O的不确定性分别降低了47.8%、34.3%和32.5%。随着站点的增加,不确定性降低的收益减少,预期最大值小于60%。要减少非洲温室气体排放的绝对不确定性,就需要这些额外的测量站,以及综合温室气体观测站的额外限制,并减少热带非洲先前生物源通量的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Machine Learning Approach to Investigating the Relative Importance of Meteorological and Aerosol-Related Parameters in Determining Cloud Microphysical Properties Dimensionless Parameterizations of Air-Sea CO2 Gas Transfer Velocity on Surface Waves Transport of Mineral Dust Into the Arctic in Two Reanalysis Datasets of Atmospheric Composition The Climatic Role of Interactive Leaf Phenology in the Vegetation-Atmosphere System of Radiative-Convective Equilibrium Storm-Resolving Simulations Tropical and Boreal Forest – Atmosphere Interactions: A Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1