Role of health simulation centres in the COVID-19 pandemic response in Italy: a national study.

IF 1.1 Q2 Social Sciences BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning Pub Date : 2021-02-10 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000813
Pier Luigi Ingrassia, Mattia Ferrari, Matteo Paganini, Giulia Mormando
{"title":"Role of health simulation centres in the COVID-19 pandemic response in Italy: a national study.","authors":"Pier Luigi Ingrassia, Mattia Ferrari, Matteo Paganini, Giulia Mormando","doi":"10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically affected the Italian health systems and drastically impacted healthcare workers' daily routine and training. Simulation is an efficient tool to provide medical education, especially in the case of incoming public health emergencies. This study investigated the role and activities of Italian simulation centres (SCs) during the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The population was identified through a web search. The directors of Italian SCs were contacted via email and then enrolled. A structured interview was created, internally validated and administrated by phone to participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the government's ordinance, 37 (88.37%) SCs had to be closed to the public. Twenty (46.51%) SCs organised in situ simulation while 7 (16.28%) of them organised simulation inside the centre. Twenty-three (53.49%) SCs resorted to telematic modalities to provide training about COVID-19 and 21 (48.84%) of them for other training. Up to date, 13 SCs are still closed to the public.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Italy has been severely hit by COVID-19, with differences between the regions. Almost all the SCs were closed, with only a few delivering training. The SCs took advantage of emergent technologies to create new ways to train people safely. Unfortunately, nearly one-fourth of Italian SCs have not reopened yet. The evolution of the COVID-19 epidemic calls for reconsideration about training activities including adequate safety measures implemented for all individuals involved.</p>","PeriodicalId":44757,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8936561/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically affected the Italian health systems and drastically impacted healthcare workers' daily routine and training. Simulation is an efficient tool to provide medical education, especially in the case of incoming public health emergencies. This study investigated the role and activities of Italian simulation centres (SCs) during the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: The population was identified through a web search. The directors of Italian SCs were contacted via email and then enrolled. A structured interview was created, internally validated and administrated by phone to participants.

Results: Following the government's ordinance, 37 (88.37%) SCs had to be closed to the public. Twenty (46.51%) SCs organised in situ simulation while 7 (16.28%) of them organised simulation inside the centre. Twenty-three (53.49%) SCs resorted to telematic modalities to provide training about COVID-19 and 21 (48.84%) of them for other training. Up to date, 13 SCs are still closed to the public.

Conclusions: Italy has been severely hit by COVID-19, with differences between the regions. Almost all the SCs were closed, with only a few delivering training. The SCs took advantage of emergent technologies to create new ways to train people safely. Unfortunately, nearly one-fourth of Italian SCs have not reopened yet. The evolution of the COVID-19 epidemic calls for reconsideration about training activities including adequate safety measures implemented for all individuals involved.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意大利卫生模拟中心在应对 COVID-19 大流行中的作用:一项全国性研究。
导言:COVID-19 大流行严重影响了意大利的卫生系统,并对医护人员的日常工作和培训产生了巨大影响。模拟是提供医学教育的有效工具,尤其是在突发公共卫生事件中。本研究调查了意大利模拟中心(SC)在 COVID-19 大流行急性期的作用和活动:方法:通过网络搜索确定研究对象。通过电子邮件与意大利模拟中心的负责人取得联系,然后进行登记。对参与者进行了结构化访谈、内部验证和电话管理:根据政府法令,37 个(88.37%)SC 必须对公众关闭。20家(46.51%)中心组织了现场模拟,7家(16.28%)在中心内组织了模拟。23 个(53.49%)自然科学中心采用远程模式提供有关 COVID-19 的培训,21 个(48.84%)自然科学中心提供其他培训。迄今为止,仍有 13 个中心对公众关闭:结论:意大利受到 COVID-19 的严重影响,各地区之间存在差异。几乎所有的培训中心都已关闭,只有少数提供培训。SC 利用新兴技术创造了安全培训人员的新方法。遗憾的是,近四分之一的意大利 SC 尚未重新开放。COVID-19 疫情的演变要求我们重新考虑培训活动,包括为所有相关人员实施适当的安全措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of Simulation-based Training on Reflective Practice. Virtual tabletop simulations for primary care pandemic preparedness and response. Developing a simulation programme to train airway management during the COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary-level hospital. Interprofessional teamwork for managing medical deterioration in pregnancy: what contributes to good clinical performance in simulated practice? Age suit simulation replicates in healthy young adults the functional challenges to balance experienced by older adults: an observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1