Joint Source and Schema Evolution: Insights from a Study of 195 FOSS Projects

Panos Vassiliadis, Fation Shehaj, George Kalampokis, A. Zarras
{"title":"Joint Source and Schema Evolution: Insights from a Study of 195 FOSS Projects","authors":"Panos Vassiliadis, Fation Shehaj, George Kalampokis, A. Zarras","doi":"10.48786/edbt.2023.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we address the problem of the co-evolution of Free Open Source Software projects with the relational schemata that they encompass. We exploit a data set of 195 publicly available schema histories of FOSS projects hosted in Github, for which we locally cloned their respective project and measured their evolution progress. Our first research question asks which percentage of the projects demonstrates a “hand-in-hand” schema and source code co-evolution? To address this question, we defined synchronicity by allowing a bounded amount of lag between the cumulative evolution of the schema and the entire project. A core finding is that there are all kinds of behaviors with respect to project and schema co-evolution, resulting in only a small number of projects where the evolution of schema and project progress in sync. Moreover, we discovered that after exceeding a 5-year threshold of project life, schemata gravitate to lower rates of evolution, which practically means that, with time, the schemata stop evolving as actively as they originally did. To answer a second question, on whether evolution comes early in the life of a schema, we measured how often does the cumulative progress of schema evolution exceed the respective progress of source change, as well as the respective progress of time. The results indicate that a large majority of schemata demonstrates early advance of schema change with respect to code evolution, and, an even larger majority is also demonstrating an advance of schema evolution with respect to time, too. Third, we asked at which time point in their lives do schemata attain a substantial","PeriodicalId":88813,"journal":{"name":"Advances in database technology : proceedings. International Conference on Extending Database Technology","volume":"4 1","pages":"27-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in database technology : proceedings. International Conference on Extending Database Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48786/edbt.2023.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In this paper, we address the problem of the co-evolution of Free Open Source Software projects with the relational schemata that they encompass. We exploit a data set of 195 publicly available schema histories of FOSS projects hosted in Github, for which we locally cloned their respective project and measured their evolution progress. Our first research question asks which percentage of the projects demonstrates a “hand-in-hand” schema and source code co-evolution? To address this question, we defined synchronicity by allowing a bounded amount of lag between the cumulative evolution of the schema and the entire project. A core finding is that there are all kinds of behaviors with respect to project and schema co-evolution, resulting in only a small number of projects where the evolution of schema and project progress in sync. Moreover, we discovered that after exceeding a 5-year threshold of project life, schemata gravitate to lower rates of evolution, which practically means that, with time, the schemata stop evolving as actively as they originally did. To answer a second question, on whether evolution comes early in the life of a schema, we measured how often does the cumulative progress of schema evolution exceed the respective progress of source change, as well as the respective progress of time. The results indicate that a large majority of schemata demonstrates early advance of schema change with respect to code evolution, and, an even larger majority is also demonstrating an advance of schema evolution with respect to time, too. Third, we asked at which time point in their lives do schemata attain a substantial
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
联合源和模式演化:来自195个自由/开源软件项目研究的见解
在本文中,我们讨论了自由开源软件项目与它们所包含的关系模式的共同发展问题。我们利用了托管在Github上的195个公开可用的自由/开源软件项目的模式历史数据集,为此我们在本地克隆了它们各自的项目并测量了它们的发展进度。我们的第一个研究问题是,有多少百分比的项目展示了“手拉手”的模式和源代码协同进化?为了解决这个问题,我们通过允许模式的累积进化和整个项目之间的有限延迟来定义同步性。一个核心的发现是,关于项目和模式的共同进化有各种各样的行为,导致只有少数项目的模式的进化和项目的进展是同步的。此外,我们发现在超过5年的项目生命阈值之后,模式倾向于较低的进化速率,这实际上意味着,随着时间的推移,模式停止像最初那样积极地进化。为了回答第二个问题,即进化是否发生在模式生命的早期,我们测量了模式进化的累积进展超过源变化的各自进展以及时间的各自进展的频率。结果表明,大多数模式显示了相对于代码演化的模式变更的早期进展,而且,更大的多数模式也显示了相对于时间的模式演化的进展。第三,我们问他们在生命中的哪个时间点图式达到实质性的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Computing Generic Abstractions from Application Datasets Fair Spatial Indexing: A paradigm for Group Spatial Fairness. Data Coverage for Detecting Representation Bias in Image Datasets: A Crowdsourcing Approach Auditing for Spatial Fairness TransEdge: Supporting Efficient Read Queries Across Untrusted Edge Nodes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1