A Comparative Study on Inverse Vibration Based Damage Assessment Techniques in Beam Structure Using Ant Colony Optimization and Particle Swarm Optimization

Aditi Majumdar, Bharadwaj Nanda
{"title":"A Comparative Study on Inverse Vibration Based Damage Assessment Techniques in Beam Structure Using Ant Colony Optimization and Particle Swarm Optimization","authors":"Aditi Majumdar, Bharadwaj Nanda","doi":"10.1166/asem.2020.2649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Use of swarm intelligence has proliferated over previous couple of years for damage assessment in large and complex structures using vibration data. Available literatures shows ‘ant colony optimization’ (ACO) and ‘particle swarm optimization’ (PSO) are predominantly\n used for solving complex engineering problems including damage identification and quantification problems. The time requirement and accuracy of the vibration based damage identification algorithms depends on early exploration and late exploitation capabilities of soft computing techniques.\n However, there are not any literature available comparing algorithms on these bases. In the current study, an inverse problem is constructed using the natural frequency changes which is then solved using ACO and PSO algorithms. The algorithm is run for identification of single and multiple\n damages in simple support and cantilever beam structures. It's found that, both ACO and PSO based algorithms are capable of detecting and quantifying the damage accurately within the limited number of iterations. However, ACO based algorithm by virtue of its good exploration capability is\n able to identify near optimal region faster than PSO based algorithm, whereas PSO algorithm has good exploitation capability and hence able to provide better damage quantification than ACO algorithm at latter stages of iteration. Further, PSO based algorithm takes less time to reach at required\n accuracy level. It is also observed that, the time required for these algorithms are independent of numbers of damage and support conditions.","PeriodicalId":7213,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Science, Engineering and Medicine","volume":"41 1","pages":"918-923"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Science, Engineering and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1166/asem.2020.2649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Use of swarm intelligence has proliferated over previous couple of years for damage assessment in large and complex structures using vibration data. Available literatures shows ‘ant colony optimization’ (ACO) and ‘particle swarm optimization’ (PSO) are predominantly used for solving complex engineering problems including damage identification and quantification problems. The time requirement and accuracy of the vibration based damage identification algorithms depends on early exploration and late exploitation capabilities of soft computing techniques. However, there are not any literature available comparing algorithms on these bases. In the current study, an inverse problem is constructed using the natural frequency changes which is then solved using ACO and PSO algorithms. The algorithm is run for identification of single and multiple damages in simple support and cantilever beam structures. It's found that, both ACO and PSO based algorithms are capable of detecting and quantifying the damage accurately within the limited number of iterations. However, ACO based algorithm by virtue of its good exploration capability is able to identify near optimal region faster than PSO based algorithm, whereas PSO algorithm has good exploitation capability and hence able to provide better damage quantification than ACO algorithm at latter stages of iteration. Further, PSO based algorithm takes less time to reach at required accuracy level. It is also observed that, the time required for these algorithms are independent of numbers of damage and support conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于蚁群优化和粒子群优化的梁结构反振动损伤评估技术对比研究
在过去的几年里,利用振动数据对大型复杂结构进行损伤评估的群体智能已经得到了广泛的应用。现有文献表明,“蚁群优化”(ACO)和“粒子群优化”(PSO)主要用于解决复杂工程问题,包括损伤识别和量化问题。基于振动的损伤识别算法的时间要求和精度取决于软计算技术的早期探索和后期开发能力。然而,在这些基础上,没有任何文献可以比较算法。在本研究中,利用固有频率变化构造一个逆问题,然后使用蚁群算法和粒子群算法求解。将该算法应用于简支梁和悬臂梁结构的单损伤和多损伤识别。研究发现,基于蚁群算法和基于粒子群算法都能在有限的迭代次数内准确地检测和量化损伤。然而,基于蚁群算法具有较好的探索能力,能够比基于粒子群算法更快地识别出近最优区域,而粒子群算法具有较好的开发能力,在迭代后期能够比基于蚁群算法提供更好的损伤量化。此外,基于粒子群的算法在较短的时间内达到所需的精度水平。这些算法所需的时间与损伤数和支撑条件无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stabilization of Maglev Plant Through Feedback Controller Prospects and Challenges of Computer Assisted Virtual Education System During COVID-19 in Developing Countries from Students’ Perspectives Analysis of the Formation of an Aneurysm in Arteries Through Finite Element Modeling Using Hyper-Elastic Model Implications of Smartphone Technology in Environmental Noise Monitoring in Indian Perspectives Study on the Hemolytic and Anti-Hemolytic Activities of the Aerial Parts Extracts of Centaurea virgata and Centaurea solstitialis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1