India–Iran relations and the US exit from Afghanistan: finding common ground?

IF 1.8 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Global Discourse Pub Date : 2022-08-18 DOI:10.1332/204378921x16587379187471
Sumitha Narayanan Kutty
{"title":"India–Iran relations and the US exit from Afghanistan: finding common ground?","authors":"Sumitha Narayanan Kutty","doi":"10.1332/204378921x16587379187471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The withdrawal of US troops and the subsequent return of the Taliban to power have resulted in India and Iran aligning over Afghanistan’s future once again. India risks facing isolation and sees its relationship with Iran as essential to preventing Pakistani hegemony in their shared neighbourhood. Their renewed regional convergence overlaps with an otherwise widening strategic dissonance as the two countries drift further apart within the international order: India as a defence partner of the US embedded in the Indo-Pacific framework and Iran working with China and Russia to counter the US-led order. This often raises questions of reliability within the India–Iran partnership. The article engages with this perception and examines India’s strategic calculus vis-a-vis Iran in a changing global order characterised by declining US commitment. It argues that, notwithstanding the numerous structural and bilateral constraints between them, India will continue to engage an otherwise challenging partner like Iran, as its strategies are, on balance, benefitting from a world that is in flux.","PeriodicalId":37814,"journal":{"name":"Global Discourse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Discourse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/204378921x16587379187471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The withdrawal of US troops and the subsequent return of the Taliban to power have resulted in India and Iran aligning over Afghanistan’s future once again. India risks facing isolation and sees its relationship with Iran as essential to preventing Pakistani hegemony in their shared neighbourhood. Their renewed regional convergence overlaps with an otherwise widening strategic dissonance as the two countries drift further apart within the international order: India as a defence partner of the US embedded in the Indo-Pacific framework and Iran working with China and Russia to counter the US-led order. This often raises questions of reliability within the India–Iran partnership. The article engages with this perception and examines India’s strategic calculus vis-a-vis Iran in a changing global order characterised by declining US commitment. It argues that, notwithstanding the numerous structural and bilateral constraints between them, India will continue to engage an otherwise challenging partner like Iran, as its strategies are, on balance, benefitting from a world that is in flux.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印伊关系和美国从阿富汗撤军:找到共同点?
美军的撤离和随后塔利班的重新掌权导致印度和伊朗在阿富汗的未来问题上再次结盟。印度面临着被孤立的风险,并将其与伊朗的关系视为防止巴基斯坦在其共同邻国霸权的关键。随着两国在国际秩序中渐行渐远,两国重新出现的地区趋同与一种日益扩大的战略不协调重叠:印度作为美国在印太框架中的防务伙伴,伊朗与中国和俄罗斯合作,对抗美国主导的秩序。这常常引发对印伊伙伴关系可靠性的质疑。本文探讨了这一观点,并探讨了印度在以美国承诺减少为特征的不断变化的全球秩序中对伊朗的战略考量。它认为,尽管两国之间存在许多结构性和双边限制,但印度将继续与伊朗这样一个在其他方面具有挑战性的伙伴交往,因为总的来说,印度的战略受益于一个不断变化的世界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Discourse
Global Discourse Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Global Discourse is an interdisciplinary, problem-oriented journal of applied contemporary thought operating at the intersection of politics, international relations, sociology and social policy. The journal’s scope is broad, encouraging interrogation of current affairs with regard to core questions of distributive justice, wellbeing, cultural diversity, autonomy, sovereignty, security and recognition. All issues are themed and aimed at addressing pressing issues as they emerge.
期刊最新文献
‘What do we exactly have the power to decolonise?’ A reply to ‘(Un)Doing performative decolonisation in the global development “imaginaries” of academia’ by Two Convivial Thinkers Black feminist political ecologies: a reply to ‘Questioning development from Black feminisms in Ecuador and moving towards a Black feminist political ecology in the Americas’ by Sofia Zaragocin et al Introduction: New perspectives on development A reply to ‘Human security, sustainable livelihoods and development: the case of the Niger Delta region in Nigeria’ by Benita Ebindu Siloko Human security, sustainable livelihoods and development: the case of the Niger Delta region in Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1