{"title":"Analisis Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 8/PUU-XVII/2019","authors":"Firda Rizqika","doi":"10.30652/jih.v11i1.8156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis study aims to determine the changes in the rules for Implementing the execution of fiduciary guarantees after the Constitutional Court's decision, analyze the problems that arise before the decision. And the reconstruction of the rules after the Constitutional Court's decision. This research is a normative research based on the rule of law and decisions. The results showed that the rules for execution of guarantees before the Constitutional Court's decision caused violations of the debtor's rights such as threats, violence. Meanwhile, after the decision of the Constitutional Court, the arrangement must go through a court decision which is considered to provide more guarantee and legal certainty for the parties. Changes in the rules for implementing executions need to be accompanied by socialization of the rules, and ease of decision making so as to create legal awareness in the community.ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perubahan aturan pelaksanaan eksekusi jaminan fidusi pasca putusan MK, menganalisis permasalahan yang timbul sebelum adanya putusan. Dan rekonstruksi aturan pasca putusan MK.Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normative yang didasarkan pada aturan hukum dan putusan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa aturan eksekusi jaminan sebelum adanya putusan MK menimbulkan pelanggaran hak debitur seperti pengamncaman, kekerasan. Sedangkan setelah adanya putusan MK pengaturan harus melalui putusan pengadilan dirasa lebih memberikan jaminan dan kepastian hukum bagi para pihak. Perubahan aturan pelaksanaan eksekusi perlu dibarengi dengan sosialisasi aturan, dan kemudahan dalam putusan sehingga menimbulkan kesadaran hukum di masyarakat. ","PeriodicalId":31748,"journal":{"name":"Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30652/jih.v11i1.8156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACTThis study aims to determine the changes in the rules for Implementing the execution of fiduciary guarantees after the Constitutional Court's decision, analyze the problems that arise before the decision. And the reconstruction of the rules after the Constitutional Court's decision. This research is a normative research based on the rule of law and decisions. The results showed that the rules for execution of guarantees before the Constitutional Court's decision caused violations of the debtor's rights such as threats, violence. Meanwhile, after the decision of the Constitutional Court, the arrangement must go through a court decision which is considered to provide more guarantee and legal certainty for the parties. Changes in the rules for implementing executions need to be accompanied by socialization of the rules, and ease of decision making so as to create legal awareness in the community.ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perubahan aturan pelaksanaan eksekusi jaminan fidusi pasca putusan MK, menganalisis permasalahan yang timbul sebelum adanya putusan. Dan rekonstruksi aturan pasca putusan MK.Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normative yang didasarkan pada aturan hukum dan putusan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa aturan eksekusi jaminan sebelum adanya putusan MK menimbulkan pelanggaran hak debitur seperti pengamncaman, kekerasan. Sedangkan setelah adanya putusan MK pengaturan harus melalui putusan pengadilan dirasa lebih memberikan jaminan dan kepastian hukum bagi para pihak. Perubahan aturan pelaksanaan eksekusi perlu dibarengi dengan sosialisasi aturan, dan kemudahan dalam putusan sehingga menimbulkan kesadaran hukum di masyarakat.
摘要本研究旨在确定宪法法院判决后信义担保执行规则的变化,分析判决前出现的问题。以及宪法法院判决后的规则重建。本研究是基于法治和决策的规范性研究。结果显示,在宪法裁判所做出判决之前的担保履行规则,出现了威胁、暴力等侵害债务人权利的行为。同时,在宪法法院做出决定后,该安排必须经过法院的判决,这被认为是为当事人提供更多的保障和法律确定性。执行死刑规则的改变需要伴随着规则的社会化和决策的便利性,从而在社区中建立法律意识。摘要:penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perubahan turan pelaksanaan eksekusi jaminan fidusi pasca putusan MK, menganalis permasalahan yang timbul sebelum adanya putusan。Dan rekonstruksi aturan pasca putusan mark . penelitian ini merupakan penelitian规范性yang didasarkan pada aturan hukum Dan putusan。我的朋友们,我的朋友们,我的朋友们,我的朋友们,我的朋友们,我的朋友们。国会议员,国会议员,国会议员,国会议员,国会议员,国会议员,国会议员。在秘鲁,人们都知道自己是一个社会的人,但在印度,人们都知道自己是一个社会的人。