Effect of Different Adhesive Strategies on the Microshear Bond Strength of Calcium-Silicate-Based Materials

IF 0.6 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Advanced Oral Research Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1177/23202068221118979
A. Gürcan, Soner Şişmanoğlu, Görkem Sengez
{"title":"Effect of Different Adhesive Strategies on the Microshear Bond Strength of Calcium-Silicate-Based Materials","authors":"A. Gürcan, Soner Şişmanoğlu, Görkem Sengez","doi":"10.1177/23202068221118979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To evaluate the microshear bond strength (µSBS) of mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine to various resin-based materials using different adhesive strategies. Materials and Methods: Three resin-based materials—a self-adhering resin composite with or without acid etching (Vertise flow; Kerr, Orange, CA, USA), a conventional flowable composite with a total-etch adhesive (Filtek Ultimate Flowable; 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA), and a flowable resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) without any surface modification (Ionoseal; VOCO GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany)—and two calcium-silicate-based materials—Biodentine and BIOfactor mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)—were tested. A total of 100 cylindrical acrylic molds were prepared. Biodentine and BIOfactor MTA were prepared and placed into the central holes on the molds. Specimens were divided into two main groups according to materials and into five subgroups (n = 10). µSBS were evaluated using a µSBS testing device. The failure modes were examined under a stereomicroscope with magnification. They were categorized as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed. Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test. The significance level was taken as α = 0.05. Results: It was observed that both calcium-silicate-based material type and resin-based material type influenced the µSBS significantly according to two-way ANOVA. Biodentine exhibited higher bond strength values than MTA. However, no statistically significant interaction was demonstrated between these factors (P = .396). The µSBS values of intermediate materials to Biodentine and MTA were listed from the lowest to the highest as follows: RMGIC < Acid Etch + RMGIC < SARC (self-adhering resin composite) < FC (flowable composite) < Acid Etch + SARC. Conclusion: Self-adhering composites can be used on calcium-silicate-based materials in vital pulp treatments because of their mechanical properties. Acid-etching ensures high µSBS values. Although the µSBS of Biodentine were higher than MTA according to this study’s results, there was no statistically significant difference in µSBS of FC and acid-etched SARC to MTA.","PeriodicalId":43017,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Oral Research","volume":"41 1","pages":"191 - 199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23202068221118979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the microshear bond strength (µSBS) of mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine to various resin-based materials using different adhesive strategies. Materials and Methods: Three resin-based materials—a self-adhering resin composite with or without acid etching (Vertise flow; Kerr, Orange, CA, USA), a conventional flowable composite with a total-etch adhesive (Filtek Ultimate Flowable; 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA), and a flowable resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) without any surface modification (Ionoseal; VOCO GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany)—and two calcium-silicate-based materials—Biodentine and BIOfactor mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)—were tested. A total of 100 cylindrical acrylic molds were prepared. Biodentine and BIOfactor MTA were prepared and placed into the central holes on the molds. Specimens were divided into two main groups according to materials and into five subgroups (n = 10). µSBS were evaluated using a µSBS testing device. The failure modes were examined under a stereomicroscope with magnification. They were categorized as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed. Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test. The significance level was taken as α = 0.05. Results: It was observed that both calcium-silicate-based material type and resin-based material type influenced the µSBS significantly according to two-way ANOVA. Biodentine exhibited higher bond strength values than MTA. However, no statistically significant interaction was demonstrated between these factors (P = .396). The µSBS values of intermediate materials to Biodentine and MTA were listed from the lowest to the highest as follows: RMGIC < Acid Etch + RMGIC < SARC (self-adhering resin composite) < FC (flowable composite) < Acid Etch + SARC. Conclusion: Self-adhering composites can be used on calcium-silicate-based materials in vital pulp treatments because of their mechanical properties. Acid-etching ensures high µSBS values. Although the µSBS of Biodentine were higher than MTA according to this study’s results, there was no statistically significant difference in µSBS of FC and acid-etched SARC to MTA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同粘结策略对硅酸钙基材料微剪切粘结强度的影响
目的:研究三氧化二矿骨料和生物钛在不同粘接策略下与不同树脂基材料的微剪切粘接强度(µSBS)。材料和方法:三种树脂基材料——一种自粘树脂复合材料,有或没有酸蚀(垂直流动;Kerr, Orange, CA, USA),一种具有全蚀刻粘合剂的传统可流动复合材料(Filtek Ultimate flowable;3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA),以及一种无需任何表面改性的可流动树脂改性玻璃离子水泥(RMGIC) (Ionoseal;VOCO GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany)和两种基于硅酸钙的材料——biodentine和BIOfactor矿物三氧化物聚集体(MTA)——进行了测试。共制备了100个圆柱形亚克力模具。制备Biodentine和BIOfactor MTA并放置在模具的中心孔中。标本按材料分为两大组和5个亚组(n = 10)。使用µSBS测试装置评估µSBS。在体视显微镜下观察了失效模式。它们被分为粘接型、内聚型和混合型。数据分析采用双因素方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey检验。显著性水平取α = 0.05。结果:通过双因素方差分析发现,硅酸钙基材料类型和树脂基材料类型对微SBS均有显著影响。与MTA相比,Biodentine具有更高的粘结强度。然而,这些因素之间没有统计学上显著的相互作用(P = 0.396)。中间材料对Biodentine和MTA的µSBS值由低到高依次为RMGIC < Acid Etch + RMGIC < SARC(自粘树脂复合材料)< FC(可流动复合材料)< Acid Etch + SARC。结论:自粘复合材料具有良好的力学性能,可用于硅酸钙基材料的重要牙髓治疗。酸蚀确保高µSBS值。虽然本研究结果显示Biodentine的µSBS高于MTA,但FC和酸蚀SARC的µSBS与MTA的差异无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Oral Research
Journal of Advanced Oral Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Radiographic Outcomes of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) with and Without Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) In Direct Pulp Capping: A Clinical Pilot Study Mineralized Collagen Fiber-based Dental Implant: Novel Perspectives Do Polishing Methods and Colorant Beverages Affect the Color Stainability of 3D-printed Permanent Restorations? The Intraoral Findings of the Patient with Robinow Syndrome and the Related Dental Treatment Approaches: A Case Report Effect of Bleaching on the Microhardness and Modulus of Elasticity of ACTIVA BioACTIVE – RESTORATIVE: An In Vitro Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1