Macrolide resistance pattern of staphylococci collected from hospitalized patients in Egypt

Amr S. Bishr, K. Aboshanab, M. Yassien, N. Hassouna
{"title":"Macrolide resistance pattern of staphylococci collected from hospitalized patients in Egypt","authors":"Amr S. Bishr, K. Aboshanab, M. Yassien, N. Hassouna","doi":"10.21608/aps.2019.17921.1015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Macrolide resistance of staphylococci has risen dramatically in recent years generating a real challenge for their treatment as therapeutic options have become very limited. In this study, an antibiogram analysis of one hundred and fifty Staphylococcus sp. isolates collected from various clinical specimens, against erythromycin, azithromycin, spiramycin, and clindamycin was carried out. Out of the 150 collected Staphylococcus sp. isolates, 54 isolates (36%) showed resistance to two or more of the tested macrolides. Inducible macrolide, lincosamides and streptogramin type B resistance phenotype (iMLS) using D-test was identified in 15 of the resistant isolates (27.8%). Molecular detection of major genes coding for macrolide resistance, including erythromycin ribosomal methylase (ermA and ermC), and macrolide-streptogramin resistance gene (msrA) was carried out using PCR. It was found that 51.8, 37.1 and 11.1% of the resistant isolates carried one, two and three types of the resistance genes, respectively. However, ermC was the most frequently occurring gene (81.5%), followed by the msrA gene (42.6%), then the ermA gene (35.2%). In conclusion, the genotypic analysis revealed that the majority of the tested isolates harbored two or more macrolide resistance-coding genes where 36% displayed resistance to at least two of the most common macrolide antibiotics used in the treatment of such important pathogens particularly in patients exhibiting hypersensitivity to penicillins according to several international guidelines. Therefore, it is crucial to carry out more epidemiologic studies to clearly understand the problem of increasing macrolide resistance among Staphylococci and to implement new guidelines for the treatment of such important pathogens, particularly in Egypt.","PeriodicalId":8314,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Pharmaceutical Sciences Ain Shams University","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Pharmaceutical Sciences Ain Shams University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/aps.2019.17921.1015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Macrolide resistance of staphylococci has risen dramatically in recent years generating a real challenge for their treatment as therapeutic options have become very limited. In this study, an antibiogram analysis of one hundred and fifty Staphylococcus sp. isolates collected from various clinical specimens, against erythromycin, azithromycin, spiramycin, and clindamycin was carried out. Out of the 150 collected Staphylococcus sp. isolates, 54 isolates (36%) showed resistance to two or more of the tested macrolides. Inducible macrolide, lincosamides and streptogramin type B resistance phenotype (iMLS) using D-test was identified in 15 of the resistant isolates (27.8%). Molecular detection of major genes coding for macrolide resistance, including erythromycin ribosomal methylase (ermA and ermC), and macrolide-streptogramin resistance gene (msrA) was carried out using PCR. It was found that 51.8, 37.1 and 11.1% of the resistant isolates carried one, two and three types of the resistance genes, respectively. However, ermC was the most frequently occurring gene (81.5%), followed by the msrA gene (42.6%), then the ermA gene (35.2%). In conclusion, the genotypic analysis revealed that the majority of the tested isolates harbored two or more macrolide resistance-coding genes where 36% displayed resistance to at least two of the most common macrolide antibiotics used in the treatment of such important pathogens particularly in patients exhibiting hypersensitivity to penicillins according to several international guidelines. Therefore, it is crucial to carry out more epidemiologic studies to clearly understand the problem of increasing macrolide resistance among Staphylococci and to implement new guidelines for the treatment of such important pathogens, particularly in Egypt.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃及住院患者葡萄球菌大环内酯类耐药模式分析
近年来,葡萄球菌对大环内酯类药物的耐药性急剧上升,由于治疗选择非常有限,对其治疗构成了真正的挑战。本研究对从不同临床标本中采集的150株葡萄球菌进行了对红霉素、阿奇霉素、螺旋霉素和克林霉素的抗菌谱分析。在收集到的150株葡萄球菌分离株中,54株(36%)对两种或两种以上的大环内酯类耐药。经d检验,15株耐药菌株(27.8%)存在诱导型大环内酯类、林肯胺类和链霉素B型耐药表型(iMLS)。采用PCR技术检测大环内酯类耐药基因,包括红霉素核糖体甲基化酶(ermA)和ermC,以及大环内酯-链状gramin耐药基因(msrA)。结果显示,51.8%、37.1和11.1%的耐药菌株分别携带1、2和3种耐药基因。然而,ermC是最常见的基因(81.5%),其次是msrA基因(42.6%),然后是ermA基因(35.2%)。总之,基因型分析显示,大多数测试分离株含有两个或更多大环内酯类耐药编码基因,其中36%对至少两种最常见的大环内酯类抗生素耐药,这些抗生素用于治疗这些重要病原体,特别是根据一些国际指南,对青霉素过敏的患者。因此,开展更多的流行病学研究以清楚地了解葡萄球菌中大环内酯类药物耐药性增加的问题,并实施治疗这类重要病原体的新指南至关重要,特别是在埃及。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Mechanisms and Protective Strategies in Cognitive Impairment Induced by Combination of Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Chemobrain: Insight the possible mechanisms of action induced by chemotherapeutic agents. A Comprehensive Review of the Pathophysiology of Depression Extremely low frequency electromagnetic field (ELF-EMF) as a promising tool for treatment against multi-drug resistant bacteria Evaluation of the antibacterial, antibiofilm, and cytotoxic activities of Peltophorum africanum leaf methanolic extract
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1