The Effects of Artificial Intelligence Education: A Meta-Analysis

S. Yoon
{"title":"The Effects of Artificial Intelligence Education: A Meta-Analysis","authors":"S. Yoon","doi":"10.14333/kjte.2023.39.1.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: According to the government policy, interest in and research on artificial intelligenceeducation has been actively conducted in Korea since 2019. The purpose of this study was to synthesizeeffects of artificial intelligence education through meta-analysis. \nMethods: The researcher rigorously selected a total of 43 primary studies including 25 journal articlesand 18 theses and dissertations reporting effects of artificial intelligence education. To calculate theeffect size, first, the effect size for each study was calculated, and then the overall effect size wascalculated. Subgroup analyses were then performed to compare differences by study characteristics. CMA 3.0 program was used in data analysis. \nResults: First, the overall effect size of artificial intelligence education is 0.687, which can beinterpreted as a medium effect size. Second, effect sizes according to the school level were 0.947for college, 0.784 for high school, 0.784 for middle school, and 0.633 for elementary school. Third,effect sizes according to the learning environment were 0.915 for online tools, 0.777 for the unplugged,0.705 for physical computing, 0.684 for block coding, 0.493 for script coding, and 0.332 for others. Fourth, effect sizes according to dependent variables were 0.857 for the cognitive domain and 0.57for the affective domain. \nConclusion: Based on the results of this study, it is expected that school administrators and educatorswill be able to develop effective and efficient artificial intelligence education programs. Therefore,the author hopes that artificial intelligence education will enable students at all school levels toexperience successful learning and achieve their educational goals.","PeriodicalId":22672,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Korean Teacher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Korean Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14333/kjte.2023.39.1.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: According to the government policy, interest in and research on artificial intelligenceeducation has been actively conducted in Korea since 2019. The purpose of this study was to synthesizeeffects of artificial intelligence education through meta-analysis. Methods: The researcher rigorously selected a total of 43 primary studies including 25 journal articlesand 18 theses and dissertations reporting effects of artificial intelligence education. To calculate theeffect size, first, the effect size for each study was calculated, and then the overall effect size wascalculated. Subgroup analyses were then performed to compare differences by study characteristics. CMA 3.0 program was used in data analysis. Results: First, the overall effect size of artificial intelligence education is 0.687, which can beinterpreted as a medium effect size. Second, effect sizes according to the school level were 0.947for college, 0.784 for high school, 0.784 for middle school, and 0.633 for elementary school. Third,effect sizes according to the learning environment were 0.915 for online tools, 0.777 for the unplugged,0.705 for physical computing, 0.684 for block coding, 0.493 for script coding, and 0.332 for others. Fourth, effect sizes according to dependent variables were 0.857 for the cognitive domain and 0.57for the affective domain. Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, it is expected that school administrators and educatorswill be able to develop effective and efficient artificial intelligence education programs. Therefore,the author hopes that artificial intelligence education will enable students at all school levels toexperience successful learning and achieve their educational goals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能教育的影响:一个元分析
目的:根据政府政策,自2019年以来,韩国积极开展对人工智能教育的兴趣和研究。本研究的目的是通过荟萃分析来综合人工智能教育的效果。方法:研究者严格筛选了43篇关于人工智能教育效果的初步研究,其中包括25篇期刊论文和18篇论文。为了计算效应量,首先计算每个研究的效应量,然后计算总体效应量。然后进行亚组分析,比较研究特征的差异。采用CMA 3.0程序进行数据分析。结果:第一,人工智能教育的总体效应量为0.687,可以解释为中等效应量。第二,按学校水平划分的效应量,大学为0.947,高中为0.784,初中为0.784,小学为0.633。第三,不同学习环境的效应量,在线工具为0.915,不插电工具为0.777,物理计算为0.705,分组编码为0.684,脚本编码为0.493,其他为0.332。依因变量划分的效应量在认知领域为0.857,在情感领域为0.57。结论:基于本研究的结果,期望学校管理者和教育工作者能够制定有效和高效的人工智能教育计划。因此,笔者希望人工智能教育能够让各级学校的学生都能体验到成功的学习,实现他们的教育目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Life Respect in Elementary School Education with the Morals Subject from the Perspective of Population Education The Effects of Microteaching on English T eachers’ Efficacy with Pre-service Elementary School Teachers Exploring the meaning of movement according to pre-service teachers’ acquisition of exercise skills Defect and Compensation: An Inquiry of Methodological Principles for a Moral Instructional Activity Based on L. S. Vygotsky’s Theory An Exploration of the Operation Cases and Improvement Methods in a Small Middle School Joint Physical Education Curriculum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1