Stress Intensity Predictions with ANSYS® for Use in Aircraft Engine Component Life Prediction

D. Slavik, R. Mcclain, K. Lewis
{"title":"Stress Intensity Predictions with ANSYS® for Use in Aircraft Engine Component Life Prediction","authors":"D. Slavik, R. Mcclain, K. Lewis","doi":"10.1520/STP14810S","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stress intensity (K) predictions are presented using crack opening displacements with 1 / 4 points elements at the crack tip to simulate the crack tip singularity. These results are compared to available literature valuesunder remote applied tension for a 2D thru-crack and a 3D semi-elliptical surface crack geometry. Crack-opening displacements with ANSYS were found to calculate K for the 2D thru-crack geometry to within 1% of an available reference solution and were not strongly influenced by the crack tip mesh parameters evaluated. Predicted stress intensities with crack-opening displacements were then considered for the surface flaw geometry for a range of crack aspect ratios (0.2 ≤ a/c ≤ 2.0) and crack depths (0.01 ≤ a/T ≤ 0.8). K for the surface flaw geometry was also not significantly influenced by the crack tip mesh refinement and matched literature solutions to within ′5% of predicted K for the crack depth position. Predicted stress intensities at the surface position using crack-opening displacement approaches were: (a) not strictly valid given the nature of the crack tip singularity, (b) dependent on the stress state assumption, and (c) dependent on the degree of mesh refinement. These difficulties were avoided by selecting a 2° angular position below the surface with a plane strain assumption to calculate K from predicted crack-opening displacements. This approach produced a stress intensity that was reasonably assumed to be representative of K at the surface position and was not significantly influenced by the mesh refinement or stress state assumptions. K with this approach was somewhat higher than results using alternative approaches in the literature. The implication of these results compared to other finite element based results with respect to Raju-Newman interpolation equations are discussed with probability plots. Examples with crack opening models in specific aircraft engine components are also provided.","PeriodicalId":8583,"journal":{"name":"ASTM special technical publications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASTM special technical publications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1520/STP14810S","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Stress intensity (K) predictions are presented using crack opening displacements with 1 / 4 points elements at the crack tip to simulate the crack tip singularity. These results are compared to available literature valuesunder remote applied tension for a 2D thru-crack and a 3D semi-elliptical surface crack geometry. Crack-opening displacements with ANSYS were found to calculate K for the 2D thru-crack geometry to within 1% of an available reference solution and were not strongly influenced by the crack tip mesh parameters evaluated. Predicted stress intensities with crack-opening displacements were then considered for the surface flaw geometry for a range of crack aspect ratios (0.2 ≤ a/c ≤ 2.0) and crack depths (0.01 ≤ a/T ≤ 0.8). K for the surface flaw geometry was also not significantly influenced by the crack tip mesh refinement and matched literature solutions to within ′5% of predicted K for the crack depth position. Predicted stress intensities at the surface position using crack-opening displacement approaches were: (a) not strictly valid given the nature of the crack tip singularity, (b) dependent on the stress state assumption, and (c) dependent on the degree of mesh refinement. These difficulties were avoided by selecting a 2° angular position below the surface with a plane strain assumption to calculate K from predicted crack-opening displacements. This approach produced a stress intensity that was reasonably assumed to be representative of K at the surface position and was not significantly influenced by the mesh refinement or stress state assumptions. K with this approach was somewhat higher than results using alternative approaches in the literature. The implication of these results compared to other finite element based results with respect to Raju-Newman interpolation equations are discussed with probability plots. Examples with crack opening models in specific aircraft engine components are also provided.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应力强度预测与ANSYS®用于飞机发动机部件寿命预测
采用裂纹尖端1 / 4点元的裂纹张开位移来模拟裂纹尖端奇异性,给出了应力强度(K)的预测。这些结果与现有文献值进行了比较,在远程施加张力下,二维贯通裂纹和三维半椭圆表面裂纹几何形状。利用ANSYS计算裂纹张开位移,可以计算出二维贯通裂纹几何形状的K值,误差在可用参考解的1%以内,并且不受裂纹尖端网格参数的强烈影响。然后,在裂纹长径比(0.2≤a/c≤2.0)和裂纹深度(0.01≤a/T≤0.8)范围内,考虑裂纹张开位移对表面缺陷几何形状的预测应力强度。表面缺陷几何形状的K也没有受到裂纹尖端网格细化的显著影响,并且匹配的文献解在裂纹深度位置预测K的5%以内。使用裂纹打开位移方法预测表面位置的应力强度:(a)由于裂纹尖端奇异性的性质而不是严格有效,(b)取决于应力状态假设,以及(c)取决于网格细化程度。通过选择表面以下2°角位置,并采用平面应变假设,从预测的裂纹张开位移中计算K,可以避免这些困难。这种方法产生的应力强度被合理地假设为表面位置K的代表,并且不受网格细化或应力状态假设的显着影响。该方法的K值略高于文献中使用其他方法的结果。用概率图讨论了这些结果与其他基于Raju-Newman插值方程的有限元结果的含义。文中还给出了具体航空发动机部件裂纹张开模型的实例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transmission Electron Microscopy Examinations of Metal-Oxide Interface of Zirconium-Based Alloys Irradiated in Halden Reactor-IFA-638 Translation of International Snow-Sports Equipment Standards into Injury-Prevention Practice Evaluation of Ski-Binding-Boot System Safety Using Torque Testing Influence of Sn on Deformation Mechanisms During Room Temperature Compression of Binary Zr–Sn Alloys Life Prediction Tool for Ceramic Matrix Composites at Elevated Temperatures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1