Comparative Study between Bronchial Blocker and Left Double Lumen Endotracheal Tube for One Lung Ventilation in Right Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

F. Kalam, Md Pervez Altaf Hossain, Masud Ahmed, Abdullah Masum
{"title":"Comparative Study between Bronchial Blocker and Left Double Lumen Endotracheal Tube for One Lung Ventilation in Right Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery","authors":"F. Kalam, Md Pervez Altaf Hossain, Masud Ahmed, Abdullah Masum","doi":"10.3329/jbsa.v33i1.67478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Double lumen endotracheal tubes (DLT) and bronchial Blockers (BB) have both beenused for lung isolation in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) with some inherent demerits.Thoughnot well studied is widely thought that DLT provides faster and better quality of lung collapse.\nObjective: The aim of this study was to compare the quality of lung deflation of a left sided double lumenendotracheal tube with a broncheal blocker for one lung ventilation in video-assisted thoracic surgery.\nMaterials methods: A total forty adult patients have been assigned to either DLT or BB group whoundergoing VATS procedure for mediastenal mass surgery. Correct placement of airway was confirmed byfiber optic bronchoscopy. The variables assessed were: 1. Time required for correct placement of device, 2.Time taken for lung collapse, 3. Quality of Lung collapse, 4. Number of times of airway mal-positioned, 5.Changes of blood pressure and heart rate at baseline (T1) and immediate before (T2) and after (T3) intubationand one minute after (T4) intubation, 6. Number of patients with hypoxemia (Spo2 <90%) during one lungventilation, and7.Post-operative complication like hoarseness of voice, sore throat and lung infection.\nResult: The time required to place the device in correct position was similar between two groups. Timetaken for right lung collapse in DLT was faster than BB group, DLT (2.46 ± 0.85) BB (4.76 ± 0.61) P (<0.05). HR was similar and comparable at T1, T2,T4 between groups &was significantly high at T3 inDLT (88.24 ± 7.42) than BB group (78.56 ± 9.06) and p value (=0.00007) was significant. Mean arterialpressure (MAP) were comparable between groups at T1, T2, T4, but at T3 was higher in DLT (99.36 ±9.62) than BB (92.15+6.47) and the result was statistically significant (P= 0.0084).\nConclusion: Result showed that BB could be a better and effective alternative of DLT in VATS Procedureconsidering a longer time to achieve complete lung collapse with minimum hemodynamic changes andwith minimum post-operative complication.\nJBSA 2020; 33(1): 22-27","PeriodicalId":17242,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jbsa.v33i1.67478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Double lumen endotracheal tubes (DLT) and bronchial Blockers (BB) have both beenused for lung isolation in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) with some inherent demerits.Thoughnot well studied is widely thought that DLT provides faster and better quality of lung collapse. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the quality of lung deflation of a left sided double lumenendotracheal tube with a broncheal blocker for one lung ventilation in video-assisted thoracic surgery. Materials methods: A total forty adult patients have been assigned to either DLT or BB group whoundergoing VATS procedure for mediastenal mass surgery. Correct placement of airway was confirmed byfiber optic bronchoscopy. The variables assessed were: 1. Time required for correct placement of device, 2.Time taken for lung collapse, 3. Quality of Lung collapse, 4. Number of times of airway mal-positioned, 5.Changes of blood pressure and heart rate at baseline (T1) and immediate before (T2) and after (T3) intubationand one minute after (T4) intubation, 6. Number of patients with hypoxemia (Spo2 <90%) during one lungventilation, and7.Post-operative complication like hoarseness of voice, sore throat and lung infection. Result: The time required to place the device in correct position was similar between two groups. Timetaken for right lung collapse in DLT was faster than BB group, DLT (2.46 ± 0.85) BB (4.76 ± 0.61) P (<0.05). HR was similar and comparable at T1, T2,T4 between groups &was significantly high at T3 inDLT (88.24 ± 7.42) than BB group (78.56 ± 9.06) and p value (=0.00007) was significant. Mean arterialpressure (MAP) were comparable between groups at T1, T2, T4, but at T3 was higher in DLT (99.36 ±9.62) than BB (92.15+6.47) and the result was statistically significant (P= 0.0084). Conclusion: Result showed that BB could be a better and effective alternative of DLT in VATS Procedureconsidering a longer time to achieve complete lung collapse with minimum hemodynamic changes andwith minimum post-operative complication. JBSA 2020; 33(1): 22-27
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
右胸腔镜手术中支气管阻断剂与左双腔气管内管单肺通气的比较研究
背景:双腔气管内管(DLT)和支气管阻滞剂(BB)都被用于电视辅助胸外科(VATS)的肺隔离,但存在一些固有的缺点。尽管没有得到充分的研究,但人们普遍认为DLT提供了更快、更好的肺塌陷质量。目的:本研究的目的是比较电视辅助胸外科手术中单肺通气时左双腔气管内管与支气管阻滞剂的肺收缩质量。材料方法:共有40名成年患者被分配到DLT组或BB组,接受VATS手术进行纵隔肿块手术。经纤维支气管镜检查证实气道位置正确。评估的变量为:1;正确放置装置所需的时间;肺萎陷所需时间,3。肺萎陷的质量,4。气道定位错误次数,5。5 .基线(T1)、插管前(T2)、插管后(T3)和插管后(T4) 1分钟血压和心率的变化;1次肺通气时低氧血症(Spo2 <90%)患者数;术后并发症如声音嘶哑,喉咙痛和肺部感染。结果:两组患者放置器械正确位置所需时间相近。DLT组右肺萎陷时间明显快于BB组,DLT组(2.46±0.85)P <0.05, BB组(4.76±0.61)P <0.05。两组间T1、T2、T4时HR相似且具有可比性,且T3 inDLT时HR(88.24±7.42)明显高于BB组(78.56±9.06),p值(=0.00007)差异有统计学意义。各组T1、T2、T4时平均动脉压(MAP)比较,但DLT组T3时平均动脉压(99.36±9.62)高于BB组(92.15+6.47),差异有统计学意义(P= 0.0084)。结论:在VATS手术中,BB是一种较好的、有效的替代DLT的方法,因为BB达到完全肺塌陷所需时间较长,血流动力学变化最小,术后并发症最少。JBSA 2020;33 (1): 27
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Premedication of Oral Clonidine 2mcg/kg and 4mcg/kg for Analgesic and Pressure Response During First Twenty-four Hours After Upper Abdominal Surgery: A Comparative Study Comparison between effects of Clonazepam and Dexmedetomidine as sedative in elective Caesarean section under Subarachnoid anaesthesia A Dose Response Study Of Oral clonidine as premedication in patients undergoing abdominal gynaecological surgery Blood Glucose Variability as a Predictor of Mortality for Septic Patients in Intensive Care Unit Postoperative pain relief in pediatric surgery patients: Effect of intravenous paracetamol in comparison with diclofenac suppository
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1