Impact of mobile health (mHealth) interventions during the perinatal period for mothers in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

J. Dol, B. Richardson, G. Tomblin Murphy, M. Aston, D. McMillan, M. Campbell-Yeo
{"title":"Impact of mobile health (mHealth) interventions during the perinatal period for mothers in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.","authors":"J. Dol, B. Richardson, G. Tomblin Murphy, M. Aston, D. McMillan, M. Campbell-Yeo","doi":"10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-004022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nThe primary objective of this review was to determine the impact of mother-targeted mobile health (mHealth) educational interventions available during the perinatal period in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) on maternal and neonatal outcomes.\n\n\nINTRODUCTION\nThere has been significant growth of mHealth projects in LMICs. The use of mHealth interventions across the perinatal period offers the ability to share information with mothers about essential newborn care and to encourage mothers to attend perinatal clinics to obtain additional in-person support as needed. The impact of perinatal mHealth educational interventions on maternal behavior change and early neonatal mortality and morbidity outcomes in LMICs is unknown.\n\n\nINCLUSION CRITERIA\nThis review considered studies that included mHealth educational interventions targeting mothers living in LMICs during the antenatal or postnatal period using mobile devices. The intervention must have been initiated during the antenatal period (conception through birth) through six weeks postnatally. All experimental study designs were included. Outcomes included maternal knowledge, maternal self-efficacy, antenatal/postnatal care attendance and newborn early morbidity and mortality.\n\n\nMETHODS\nPubMed, Embase and CINAHL were searched on March 19, 2018 for studies published in English. The search was updated on June 7, 2018. Critical appraisal was undertaken by two independent reviewers using standardized critical appraisal instruments. Quantitative data were extracted from included studies independently by two reviewers using a standardized data extraction tool. All conflicts were resolved through consensus with a third reviewer. Quantitative data were, where possible, pooled in statistical meta-analysis. Where statistical pooling was not possible, the findings were reported narratively.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA total of 1514 articles were screened, and 71 full-text papers were assessed for eligibility, with 23 articles critically appraised. Following appraisal, three articles were excluded due to poor quality. Of the 20 articles included, 16 were peer reviewed articles and four were gray literature reports. Eight papers targeted antenatal education, eight covered postnatal education and four covered both antenatal and postnatal education. Studies varied in terms of design, country, approach, frequency and content. Mothers who received an mHealth intervention attended a significantly greater number of antenatal care contacts (mean difference = 0.67, 95% confidence interval, 0.35 to 0.99, P = 0.0001) and were significantly more likely to have at least one postnatal care contact between six and eight weeks (odds ratio = 1.36, 95% confidence interval, 1.00 to 1.85, P = 0.05). Maternal knowledge, self-efficacy and neonatal mortality and morbidity were inconsistently reported across studies.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nmHealth education interventions are associated with increased maternal contact antenatally and postnatally in LMICs. Due to heterogeneity of studies among country of implementation, approach, frequency and content of the mHealth interventions, the impact on other maternal and neonatal outcomes is inconclusive. Future work using mHealth to target maternal education during the perinatal period should focus on standardization of content and outcome evaluations.","PeriodicalId":73539,"journal":{"name":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-004022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The primary objective of this review was to determine the impact of mother-targeted mobile health (mHealth) educational interventions available during the perinatal period in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) on maternal and neonatal outcomes. INTRODUCTION There has been significant growth of mHealth projects in LMICs. The use of mHealth interventions across the perinatal period offers the ability to share information with mothers about essential newborn care and to encourage mothers to attend perinatal clinics to obtain additional in-person support as needed. The impact of perinatal mHealth educational interventions on maternal behavior change and early neonatal mortality and morbidity outcomes in LMICs is unknown. INCLUSION CRITERIA This review considered studies that included mHealth educational interventions targeting mothers living in LMICs during the antenatal or postnatal period using mobile devices. The intervention must have been initiated during the antenatal period (conception through birth) through six weeks postnatally. All experimental study designs were included. Outcomes included maternal knowledge, maternal self-efficacy, antenatal/postnatal care attendance and newborn early morbidity and mortality. METHODS PubMed, Embase and CINAHL were searched on March 19, 2018 for studies published in English. The search was updated on June 7, 2018. Critical appraisal was undertaken by two independent reviewers using standardized critical appraisal instruments. Quantitative data were extracted from included studies independently by two reviewers using a standardized data extraction tool. All conflicts were resolved through consensus with a third reviewer. Quantitative data were, where possible, pooled in statistical meta-analysis. Where statistical pooling was not possible, the findings were reported narratively. RESULTS A total of 1514 articles were screened, and 71 full-text papers were assessed for eligibility, with 23 articles critically appraised. Following appraisal, three articles were excluded due to poor quality. Of the 20 articles included, 16 were peer reviewed articles and four were gray literature reports. Eight papers targeted antenatal education, eight covered postnatal education and four covered both antenatal and postnatal education. Studies varied in terms of design, country, approach, frequency and content. Mothers who received an mHealth intervention attended a significantly greater number of antenatal care contacts (mean difference = 0.67, 95% confidence interval, 0.35 to 0.99, P = 0.0001) and were significantly more likely to have at least one postnatal care contact between six and eight weeks (odds ratio = 1.36, 95% confidence interval, 1.00 to 1.85, P = 0.05). Maternal knowledge, self-efficacy and neonatal mortality and morbidity were inconsistently reported across studies. CONCLUSIONS mHealth education interventions are associated with increased maternal contact antenatally and postnatally in LMICs. Due to heterogeneity of studies among country of implementation, approach, frequency and content of the mHealth interventions, the impact on other maternal and neonatal outcomes is inconclusive. Future work using mHealth to target maternal education during the perinatal period should focus on standardization of content and outcome evaluations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
围产期移动保健(mHealth)干预措施对低收入和中等收入国家母亲的影响:系统审查。
本综述的主要目的是确定中低收入国家(LMICs)围产期针对母亲的移动健康(mHealth)教育干预措施对孕产妇和新生儿结局的影响。中低收入国家的移动医疗项目有了显著增长。在整个围产期使用移动保健干预措施,可以与母亲分享有关基本新生儿护理的信息,并鼓励母亲到围产期诊所就诊,以便在需要时获得额外的当面支持。围产期移动健康教育干预对中低收入国家产妇行为改变和早期新生儿死亡率和发病率结局的影响尚不清楚。纳入标准本综述考虑了针对低收入国家母亲在产前或产后使用移动设备进行移动健康教育干预的研究。干预必须在产前(从受孕到分娩)至产后6周期间开始。包括所有的实验研究设计。结果包括产妇知识、产妇自我效能、产前/产后护理出席率和新生儿早期发病率和死亡率。方法检索spubmed、Embase和CINAHL于2018年3月19日发表的英文文献。该搜索于2018年6月7日更新。批判性评估由两名独立的评论者使用标准化的批判性评估工具进行。定量数据由两名评论者使用标准化数据提取工具独立地从纳入的研究中提取。所有的冲突都是通过与第三位审稿人达成共识来解决的。在可能的情况下,将定量数据汇总到统计荟萃分析中。在无法进行统计汇总的情况下,以叙述方式报告调查结果。结果共筛选文献1514篇,71篇全文入选,其中23篇为批判性评价。经鉴定,有3篇文章因质量差被排除。在纳入的20篇文章中,16篇是同行评议的文章,4篇是灰色文献报告。八篇论文针对产前教育,八篇论文涉及产后教育,四篇论文涉及产前和产后教育。研究在设计、国家、方法、频率和内容方面各不相同。接受移动健康干预的母亲参加了更多的产前护理接触(平均差异= 0.67,95%可信区间,0.35至0.99,P = 0.0001),并且在6至8周期间至少有一次产后护理接触的可能性显著增加(优势比= 1.36,95%可信区间,1.00至1.85,P = 0.05)。各研究报告的孕产妇知识、自我效能和新生儿死亡率和发病率不一致。结论健康教育干预与低收入国家产前和产后孕产妇接触增加有关。由于移动健康干预措施的实施国家、方法、频率和内容之间的研究存在异质性,因此对其他孕产妇和新生儿结局的影响尚无定论。未来使用移动医疗针对围产期孕产妇教育的工作应侧重于内容和结果评估的标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Post-discharge interventions to enhance coping skills for survivors of stroke and their caregivers: a scoping review protocol. Approaches to implementing individual placement and support in the health and welfare sectors: a scoping review protocol. Obesity and dental caries in early childhood: a systematic review protocol. Experiences of family caregivers caring for critically ill children hospitalized in a pediatric intensive care unit: a qualitative systematic review protocol. Hernioplasty using low-cost mesh compared to surgical mesh in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1