ECOBIOLOGY OF CHINKARA (GAZELLA BENNETTII) IN BOTH CAPTIVE AND WILD HABITAT OF LALSUHANRA NATIONAL PARK, BAHWALPUR, PAKISTAN

K. Anjum, H. M. Bilal, Irfan Ashraf Manj, J. Naseer, S. Hafeez, Hafiz Masood Ahmad, Talha Faridi
{"title":"ECOBIOLOGY OF CHINKARA (GAZELLA BENNETTII) IN BOTH CAPTIVE AND WILD HABITAT OF LALSUHANRA NATIONAL PARK, BAHWALPUR, PAKISTAN","authors":"K. Anjum, H. M. Bilal, Irfan Ashraf Manj, J. Naseer, S. Hafeez, Hafiz Masood Ahmad, Talha Faridi","doi":"10.56520/asj.v5i2.271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organisms, such as Chinkara (Gazellabennettii), which do not have adequate opportunities to express normal behaviour in captivity, exhibit more prominent morphology, feeding habits, and breeding behaviour in the wild than in captivity. The current study aimed to detect the alterations in behaviour patterns in both wild and confined settings in LalSuhanra National Park, Pakistan between August 2021 and February 2022. The criteria under investigation included morphological patterns, food and feeding habits, vigilance, resting, grooming, defecation/urination frequency, time spent together (Male-Female), grouping, being alone, affinitive interaction, agonistic activity, mounting frequency, and mounting number, amongst other factors. The results showed significant differences among the animals residing in captive and wild habitat. The wild habitat provided a variety of shrubs, herbs and trees for natural vegetation of Chinkara, while the captive Chinkra were feed by Park staff, that resulted in brighter color and wild animals were healthier in terms of height and weight. The level of vigilance in the captive population (11.2%) was greater than in the wild population (9.6%). Observations of resting were more common in the captive group (14.7%) than in the wild population (6.6%). Mounting happened considerably more often in the wild (1.5%) than in captivity (1%), and this difference was statistically significant. The grooming behaviour was less often seen in the wild population (4.1%) than captive population (7.4%). This research found that if a captive Chinkara population is housed in an enclosure with suitable gender relationships and environmental disturbance is kept to a bare minimum, the captive Chinkara population may be as prolific as the wild population in terms of health, behaviors, and reproduction.","PeriodicalId":11234,"journal":{"name":"Diyala Agricultural Sciences Journal","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diyala Agricultural Sciences Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56520/asj.v5i2.271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organisms, such as Chinkara (Gazellabennettii), which do not have adequate opportunities to express normal behaviour in captivity, exhibit more prominent morphology, feeding habits, and breeding behaviour in the wild than in captivity. The current study aimed to detect the alterations in behaviour patterns in both wild and confined settings in LalSuhanra National Park, Pakistan between August 2021 and February 2022. The criteria under investigation included morphological patterns, food and feeding habits, vigilance, resting, grooming, defecation/urination frequency, time spent together (Male-Female), grouping, being alone, affinitive interaction, agonistic activity, mounting frequency, and mounting number, amongst other factors. The results showed significant differences among the animals residing in captive and wild habitat. The wild habitat provided a variety of shrubs, herbs and trees for natural vegetation of Chinkara, while the captive Chinkra were feed by Park staff, that resulted in brighter color and wild animals were healthier in terms of height and weight. The level of vigilance in the captive population (11.2%) was greater than in the wild population (9.6%). Observations of resting were more common in the captive group (14.7%) than in the wild population (6.6%). Mounting happened considerably more often in the wild (1.5%) than in captivity (1%), and this difference was statistically significant. The grooming behaviour was less often seen in the wild population (4.1%) than captive population (7.4%). This research found that if a captive Chinkara population is housed in an enclosure with suitable gender relationships and environmental disturbance is kept to a bare minimum, the captive Chinkara population may be as prolific as the wild population in terms of health, behaviors, and reproduction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴基斯坦巴哈瓦尔布尔lalsuhanra国家公园野生和圈养生境中金卡拉的生态生物学
像金卡拉(Gazellabennettii)这样的生物,在圈养环境中没有足够的机会表现出正常的行为,在野外比在圈养环境中表现出更突出的形态、食性和繁殖行为。目前的研究旨在检测2021年8月至2022年2月期间巴基斯坦LalSuhanra国家公园野生和受限环境中行为模式的变化。调查的标准包括形态模式、食物和摄食习惯、警惕性、休息、梳理、排便/排尿频率、在一起的时间(雄性-雌性)、分组、独处、亲和相互作用、激动活性、爬上次数和爬上数量,以及其他因素。结果表明,圈养生境和野生生境的动物在这方面存在显著差异。野生栖息地为Chinkra的自然植被提供了各种灌木、草本和树木,而圈养的Chinkra则由公园工作人员喂养,这使得Chinkra的颜色更鲜艳,野生动物在身高和体重方面都更健康。圈养种群的警惕性(11.2%)高于野生种群(9.6%)。圈养群体(14.7%)比野生群体(6.6%)更常观察到休息。在野外(1.5%)比圈养(1%)发生的次数要多得多,这种差异在统计学上是显著的。野生种群(4.1%)比圈养种群(7.4%)更少出现梳理行为。本研究发现,如果圈养的钦卡拉种群被关在一个有合适性别关系的圈养场所,并且将环境干扰保持在最低限度,那么圈养的钦卡拉种群在健康、行为和繁殖方面可能与野生种群一样多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perceived Effects of Climate Variability on the Rice Farmers in Niger State, Nigeria The Reality of the Usage of Extension Methods by Workers in Agricultural Extension: A review Monthly Ecological Dynamics and Their Influence on the Prevalence and Species Richness of Dactylogyrus (Monogenea) Parasites in Fishes of the Lesser Zab Riv Effect of Compaction Energy on Selected Physical and Hydraulic Properties of Soils Amended With Different Sources of Organic Matter Diastase Enzyme activity and Hydroxymethylfurfural production during thermal processing of honey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1