{"title":"The measure : Mk 4,24cd and Q 6,38c; 12,31b A note on its independence from Q","authors":"T. A. Friedrichsen","doi":"10.2143/ETL.81.1.616509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This note first provides an overview of the presentation of H. T. Fleddermann’s proposal (Mark and Q, BETL 122, Leuven, 1995, esp. pp. 85-87) that the Measure saying in Mk 4,24cd is Mark’s redaction of Q 6,38c and 12,31b. In the interest of completeness, the note spends some time reviewing Fleddermann’s reconstruction of the Q-texts. After that, the note critiques his methodology as insufficient for establishing Mark’s dependence on Q for his Measure saying (this note follows the author’s similar treatment of two other sayings: Mk 4,21 and Q 11,33, in ETL 79 [2003] 423-430; Mk 4,22 and Q 12,2, in ETL 80 [2004] 439-444). The note shows that Fleddermann’s proposal requires that Mark take both of these Q verses out of their own logical contexts, connect them rather uncomfortably, and pass over other sayings in the Q-sermon (essentially 6,20-49) that would have served even better Mark’s use of the Measure saying to refer to quality of the disciple’s hearing of the word. The note concludes that it seems more likely that the widespread Measure axiom was known to Mark as an independent saying, which he uses here for his own purposes.","PeriodicalId":42509,"journal":{"name":"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses","volume":"35 1","pages":"186-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2005-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/ETL.81.1.616509","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This note first provides an overview of the presentation of H. T. Fleddermann’s proposal (Mark and Q, BETL 122, Leuven, 1995, esp. pp. 85-87) that the Measure saying in Mk 4,24cd is Mark’s redaction of Q 6,38c and 12,31b. In the interest of completeness, the note spends some time reviewing Fleddermann’s reconstruction of the Q-texts. After that, the note critiques his methodology as insufficient for establishing Mark’s dependence on Q for his Measure saying (this note follows the author’s similar treatment of two other sayings: Mk 4,21 and Q 11,33, in ETL 79 [2003] 423-430; Mk 4,22 and Q 12,2, in ETL 80 [2004] 439-444). The note shows that Fleddermann’s proposal requires that Mark take both of these Q verses out of their own logical contexts, connect them rather uncomfortably, and pass over other sayings in the Q-sermon (essentially 6,20-49) that would have served even better Mark’s use of the Measure saying to refer to quality of the disciple’s hearing of the word. The note concludes that it seems more likely that the widespread Measure axiom was known to Mark as an independent saying, which he uses here for his own purposes.
期刊介绍:
Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses (ETL), founded in 1924, is a quarterly publication by professors of Theology and Canon Law at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and the Université catholique de Louvain (Louvain-la-Neuve). Each volume totals ca. 1300 pages. Issues 1 (April) and 4 (December) contain articles, book reviews and chronicles in various languages (English, French, German). Issue 2-3 (September) represents the annual Elenchus Bibliographicus, an extensive bibliography of books and articles that appeared during the preceding year. The bibliography (ca. 15,000 entries) covers the entire field of Theology and Canon Law: History of Theology, History of Religions.