{"title":"Phosphorus Retention of a Permeable Reactive Barrier Surpassed by an Unvegetated Artificial Pond","authors":"R. Summers, D. Weaver","doi":"10.5539/enrr.v11n1p25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An artificial pond bisected by a phosphorus (P) retentive permeable reactive barrier (PRB) alongside Forrest Highway, Coolup, Western Australia was designed to remove P from farmland runoff. The pond bed was made of subsoil and road construction materials likely to have a relatively high P sorption capacity, and there was no vegetation in the bed of the pond. Flow through the pond was intercepted by the PRB, constructed from a mixture of sand, coarse crushed limestone, and bauxite residue (with 10% phospho-gypsum). The effectiveness of P removal and the impact of the PRB was measured by comparing the concentration of contaminants immediately either side of the PRB with established standards, and against background levels in runoff from surrounding farmland. Using coarse limestone to increase flow through the PRB failed where permeability was insufficient to avoid overtopping of the PRB and the wall had to be lowered to allow by-pass and avoid collapse. The PRB was effective in removing total P (TP); however, the influent TP concentration was low (mean 0.19 mg L -1 ) because most P entering from farmland was retained in the shallow pond upstream of the PRB. Despite this, TP removal by the PRB was 53% (2009–2012). Occasionally, in spring when the pond was stagnant and anaerobic, P was released from the PRB. This minor P release coincided with a minor release of iron, consistent with anaerobic conditions found in the PRB. Although not designed to do so, the shallow pond upstream of the PRB reduced the TP concentration from farmland by 85% (mean 1.26 mg L -1 down to 0.19 mg L -1 ), mainly by reducing filterable reactive P concentration. Some elements (arsenic, cobalt, conductivity, fluoride, manganese, molybdenum, pH, selenium, uranium and vanadium) were increased by flow through the PRB, but were low relative to surrounding waters and environmental standards","PeriodicalId":11699,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Natural Resources Research","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Natural Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/enrr.v11n1p25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
An artificial pond bisected by a phosphorus (P) retentive permeable reactive barrier (PRB) alongside Forrest Highway, Coolup, Western Australia was designed to remove P from farmland runoff. The pond bed was made of subsoil and road construction materials likely to have a relatively high P sorption capacity, and there was no vegetation in the bed of the pond. Flow through the pond was intercepted by the PRB, constructed from a mixture of sand, coarse crushed limestone, and bauxite residue (with 10% phospho-gypsum). The effectiveness of P removal and the impact of the PRB was measured by comparing the concentration of contaminants immediately either side of the PRB with established standards, and against background levels in runoff from surrounding farmland. Using coarse limestone to increase flow through the PRB failed where permeability was insufficient to avoid overtopping of the PRB and the wall had to be lowered to allow by-pass and avoid collapse. The PRB was effective in removing total P (TP); however, the influent TP concentration was low (mean 0.19 mg L -1 ) because most P entering from farmland was retained in the shallow pond upstream of the PRB. Despite this, TP removal by the PRB was 53% (2009–2012). Occasionally, in spring when the pond was stagnant and anaerobic, P was released from the PRB. This minor P release coincided with a minor release of iron, consistent with anaerobic conditions found in the PRB. Although not designed to do so, the shallow pond upstream of the PRB reduced the TP concentration from farmland by 85% (mean 1.26 mg L -1 down to 0.19 mg L -1 ), mainly by reducing filterable reactive P concentration. Some elements (arsenic, cobalt, conductivity, fluoride, manganese, molybdenum, pH, selenium, uranium and vanadium) were increased by flow through the PRB, but were low relative to surrounding waters and environmental standards
位于西澳大利亚Coolup的Forrest Highway旁的人工池塘被磷(P)保留渗透性反应屏障(PRB)一分为二,旨在从农田径流中去除P。池床由底土和道路建筑材料构成,可能具有较高的P吸收能力,池床没有植被。通过池塘的水流被PRB拦截,PRB由沙子、粗碎石灰石和铝土矿渣(含10%磷石膏)混合而成。除磷的有效性和复审委员会的影响是通过比较测量污染物的浓度立即审查委员与建立标准的两侧,和背景水平径流从周围的农田。使用粗石灰石来增加通过PRB的流量失败,因为渗透性不足,无法避免PRB溢流,因此必须降低墙壁以允许旁通并避免坍塌。PRB对总磷(TP)有较好的去除效果;然而,由于农田进入的磷大部分被保留在PRB上游的浅池中,因此,进水总磷浓度较低(平均0.19 mg L -1)。尽管如此,PRB的TP去除率为53%(2009-2012)。偶尔,在春季池塘停滞和厌氧时,P从PRB中释放出来。少量P释放与少量铁释放相一致,与PRB中发现的厌氧条件一致。虽然没有这样设计,但PRB上游的浅池主要通过降低可过滤活性磷浓度,使农田总磷浓度降低了85%(平均1.26 mg L -1降至0.19 mg L -1)。某些元素(砷、钴、电导率、氟化物、锰、钼、pH值、硒、铀和钒)在流经PRB后有所增加,但相对于周围水域和环境标准而言,这些元素的含量较低