The influence of the used applicators on organ and target doses for cervical cancer patients treated with HDR brachytherapy

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.2478/pjmpe-2022-0017
Beata Pszczółkowska, Michał Bijok, B. Brzozowska
{"title":"The influence of the used applicators on organ and target doses for cervical cancer patients treated with HDR brachytherapy","authors":"Beata Pszczółkowska, Michał Bijok, B. Brzozowska","doi":"10.2478/pjmpe-2022-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction: The aim of this work was to study the influence of the applicators used for cervical cancer patients treated with high dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in the Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology in Warsaw, Poland on doses in the tumour volumes and organs at risk. Material and methods: The treatment was carried out using Iridium-192 in 4 fractions (7.5 Gy each) given in weekly intervals. Two types of applicators were used for comparison: fletcher and ring. The standard dose distribution parameters, read from the system Oncentra Brachy (version 4.5, Elekta), for bladder, rectum, and sigmoid (D2 cc) and tumour (HRCTV D100, D98, D90) were studied. Patients were divided into two groups (240 treatment plans) depending on the type of applicator used and into four groups according to the tumour volumes (HR-CTV < 25 cm3 or HR-CTV ≥ 25 cm3). The collected data were analysed using the PQStatSoftware (version 1.8.2). Results: The treatment plans prepared with all types of applicators fulfil the dose distribution requirements, however, the dose delivered to the tumour using the ring applicator was found to be the highest. For the bladder and sigmoid the optimal dose distribution was obtained when using the fletcher applicator, while for the rectum the ring applicator gave the smallest dose value. The D2 cc parameter for sigmoid obtained for fletcher treatment has smaller values in the case of patients with small tumour volume and for this type of applicator was observed a statistically significant difference when compared with the ring. Conclusions: The ring applicator gives the optimal parameters of the dose distribution independently on the tumour volume with respect to the fletcher applicator, which is however more often used in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":53955,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering","volume":"26 1","pages":"139 - 149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/pjmpe-2022-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: The aim of this work was to study the influence of the applicators used for cervical cancer patients treated with high dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in the Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology in Warsaw, Poland on doses in the tumour volumes and organs at risk. Material and methods: The treatment was carried out using Iridium-192 in 4 fractions (7.5 Gy each) given in weekly intervals. Two types of applicators were used for comparison: fletcher and ring. The standard dose distribution parameters, read from the system Oncentra Brachy (version 4.5, Elekta), for bladder, rectum, and sigmoid (D2 cc) and tumour (HRCTV D100, D98, D90) were studied. Patients were divided into two groups (240 treatment plans) depending on the type of applicator used and into four groups according to the tumour volumes (HR-CTV < 25 cm3 or HR-CTV ≥ 25 cm3). The collected data were analysed using the PQStatSoftware (version 1.8.2). Results: The treatment plans prepared with all types of applicators fulfil the dose distribution requirements, however, the dose delivered to the tumour using the ring applicator was found to be the highest. For the bladder and sigmoid the optimal dose distribution was obtained when using the fletcher applicator, while for the rectum the ring applicator gave the smallest dose value. The D2 cc parameter for sigmoid obtained for fletcher treatment has smaller values in the case of patients with small tumour volume and for this type of applicator was observed a statistically significant difference when compared with the ring. Conclusions: The ring applicator gives the optimal parameters of the dose distribution independently on the tumour volume with respect to the fletcher applicator, which is however more often used in clinical practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宫颈癌患者HDR近距离放射治疗中使用的涂敷器对器官和靶剂量的影响
摘要简介:本研究的目的是研究波兰华沙Maria Sklodowska-Curie国家肿瘤研究所高剂量率近距离放射治疗(HDR-BT)宫颈癌患者使用的应用器对肿瘤体积和危险器官剂量的影响。材料与方法:采用铱-192进行治疗,每隔一周给予4次,每次7.5 Gy。比较了两种类型的涂敷器:弗莱彻和环。从系统Oncentra Brachy(版本4.5,Elekta)读取的标准剂量分布参数,用于膀胱,直肠,乙状结肠(D2 cc)和肿瘤(HRCTV D100, D98, D90)进行了研究。根据使用的涂抹器类型将患者分为两组(240个治疗方案),根据肿瘤体积(HR-CTV < 25 cm3或HR-CTV≥25 cm3)分为四组。收集的数据使用PQStatSoftware (version 1.8.2)进行分析。结果:使用各种类型的涂敷器制备的治疗方案均满足剂量分布要求,但使用环形涂敷器给肿瘤的剂量最高。对于膀胱和乙状结肠,使用弗莱彻式施药器获得最佳剂量分布,而对于直肠,环形施药器给出的剂量值最小。对于肿瘤体积较小的患者,fletcher治疗获得的乙状结肠D2 cc参数值较小,并且与环形涂抹器相比,这种类型的涂抹器观察到具有统计学意义的差异。结论:相对于在临床实践中更常用的弗莱彻涂抹器,环形涂抹器提供了独立于肿瘤体积的剂量分布的最佳参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering
Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering (PJMPE) (Online ISSN: 1898-0309; Print ISSN: 1425-4689) is an official publication of the Polish Society of Medical Physics. It is a peer-reviewed, open access scientific journal with no publication fees. The issues are published quarterly online. The Journal publishes original contribution in medical physics and biomedical engineering.
期刊最新文献
Parametrization of subsegmental infarcts using high spatial resolution 2DSTE and synthetic ultrasonic data Automated differential diagnostics of respiratory diseases using an electronic stethoscope Evaluating the impact of anatomical changes on dose distributions in head and neck cancer Comparing eDQE and eNEQ metrics – is there an alternative approach to assessing image quality in digital mammography? Vascular stiffness in cold pressor test hyper-reactors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1