A new marker in preterm labor: RDW and MPV

Y. Kurban, Y. Alan, M. Alan, M. Kurt, B. Gurlek, Burak Cegilli, C. Taner, Abdulmecit Öktem
{"title":"A new marker in preterm labor: RDW and MPV","authors":"Y. Kurban, Y. Alan, M. Alan, M. Kurt, B. Gurlek, Burak Cegilli, C. Taner, Abdulmecit Öktem","doi":"10.15406/ogij.2020.11.00538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To evaluate whether serum platelets Mean Platelet Volum (MPV), and Red Cell Distribution width (RDW) are useful as predictors of preterm labour (PL) in patients with preterm labour (PL), and to compare the clinical efficacy of various serum inflammatory markers to predict the risk of preterm delivery (PD). Materials, and methods: The main group consisted of pregnant women who were earlier than the 37th gestational week. The control group has consisted of pregnant bigger than 37th weeks of gestation. The patients with PL who participated in the study group were divided into early preterm labour (EPL), and late preterm labour (LPL) groups. The two groups were investigated in terms of clinical aspects of RDW, and MPV and serum markers studied at admission. ROC curve analysis was used to determine the optimal MPV, RDW cut-off levels predicting PL. Results: Neutrophil (NEU), MPW, RDW, and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were significantly higher in LPL than in women who gave birth at term (p=0.006, OR=1.411; p<0.001, OR=1.410; 0.002, OR=1.612, p=0.035, OR=1.294). In multivariate regression analysis, MPV positive was the strongest predictor variable. Besides, there was a significant correlation between MPV and RDW elevation, and neonatal intensive care needs (NICU) in women who delivered between 34 weeks, and 37 weeks. Conclusion: High RDW and MPV are independent predictors of preterm delivery in patients with LPL. In our study, we found that the increase of RDW and MPV was higher in women with high PL risk more than in healthy individuals. MPV has the highest area for prediction of preterm birth, and RDW>14,5, and MPV>9,6 have the highest sensitivity and specificity. RDW may be more significant than measuring any of the individual markers in the simultaneous use of preterm delivery. The simultaneous use of RDW and MPV with existing markers to increase our identifying abilities of preterm labour may be stronger than that of any of the individual markers.","PeriodicalId":19389,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics & Gynecology International Journal","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics & Gynecology International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/ogij.2020.11.00538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate whether serum platelets Mean Platelet Volum (MPV), and Red Cell Distribution width (RDW) are useful as predictors of preterm labour (PL) in patients with preterm labour (PL), and to compare the clinical efficacy of various serum inflammatory markers to predict the risk of preterm delivery (PD). Materials, and methods: The main group consisted of pregnant women who were earlier than the 37th gestational week. The control group has consisted of pregnant bigger than 37th weeks of gestation. The patients with PL who participated in the study group were divided into early preterm labour (EPL), and late preterm labour (LPL) groups. The two groups were investigated in terms of clinical aspects of RDW, and MPV and serum markers studied at admission. ROC curve analysis was used to determine the optimal MPV, RDW cut-off levels predicting PL. Results: Neutrophil (NEU), MPW, RDW, and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were significantly higher in LPL than in women who gave birth at term (p=0.006, OR=1.411; p<0.001, OR=1.410; 0.002, OR=1.612, p=0.035, OR=1.294). In multivariate regression analysis, MPV positive was the strongest predictor variable. Besides, there was a significant correlation between MPV and RDW elevation, and neonatal intensive care needs (NICU) in women who delivered between 34 weeks, and 37 weeks. Conclusion: High RDW and MPV are independent predictors of preterm delivery in patients with LPL. In our study, we found that the increase of RDW and MPV was higher in women with high PL risk more than in healthy individuals. MPV has the highest area for prediction of preterm birth, and RDW>14,5, and MPV>9,6 have the highest sensitivity and specificity. RDW may be more significant than measuring any of the individual markers in the simultaneous use of preterm delivery. The simultaneous use of RDW and MPV with existing markers to increase our identifying abilities of preterm labour may be stronger than that of any of the individual markers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早产的新指标:RDW和MPV
目的:评价血清血小板平均血小板体积(MPV)和红细胞分布宽度(RDW)是否可作为早产(PL)患者的预测指标,并比较各种血清炎症标志物预测早产(PD)风险的临床疗效。材料与方法:主要以37孕周以下的孕妇为研究对象。对照组为妊娠大于37周的孕妇。将参与研究组的早产患者分为早期早产(EPL)组和晚期早产(LPL)组。对两组患者进行RDW临床方面的调查,并在入院时对MPV和血清标志物进行研究。结果:LPL患者中性粒细胞(NEU)、MPW、RDW和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)显著高于足月分娩妇女(p=0.006, OR=1.411;p14、5和MPV>9、6的敏感性和特异性最高。RDW可能比同时使用早产测量任何个体标志物更重要。同时使用RDW和MPV与现有的标记,以提高我们的早产识别能力可能比任何单独的标记更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recurrence of stress urinary incontinence in women treated with transobturator suburethral mesh: 9-year follow-up Probiotics and women health: clinical perspective Enabling, predisposing, and reinforcing factors influencing implementation of exclusive breastfeeding among lactating mothers in Limpopo Province, South Africa Delivery in water, experiences in a population of Mexican women in Mexico City Non-gestational primary choriocarcinoma of the ovary. Presentation of a clinical case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1