Trends in the reasons for revision total knee arthroplasty

S. Elliott Holbert, Jane C. Brennan, Sophia Cattaneo, P. King, Justin J. Turcotte, James H. MacDonald
{"title":"Trends in the reasons for revision total knee arthroplasty","authors":"S. Elliott Holbert, Jane C. Brennan, Sophia Cattaneo, P. King, Justin J. Turcotte, James H. MacDonald","doi":"10.1177/22104917231176573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: As the number of annual total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures increases the number of revision surgeries will continue to increase. Several prior studies have identified various mechanisms of TKA failure and reported a number of reasons as the most common causes. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the causes of revision TKA at a single institution and to compare those reasons with previously published data in order to provide a current update on the topic. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing TKA revision by board-certified surgeons at a single institution between January 2, 2014 and October 16, 2020 was conducted. Statistical analysis was performed to identify trends among revision reasons and compare postoperative outcomes. Results: Of the 548 patients, 179 (32.7%) had an early revision and 369 (67.3%) had a late revision. The most common causes for early revision were infection (31.3%), loosening (27.4%), and instability (10.1%). The most common causes for late revision were loosening (29.5%), infection (22.2%), and polyethylene wear (20.3%). Postoperatively, there were no significant differences in OR time, length of stay, discharge status, 30-day readmission rates, or 30-day emergency department return rates between early and late revisions. Discussion: This study demonstrated the main causes for revision at a high-volume orthopedic joint replacement center. The most common reasons for revision were infection, loosening, instability, and polyethylene wear. This data in comparison to studies in the past suggests that the causes of revision are constantly evolving and need to be reassessed periodically in order to align focus on improvement.","PeriodicalId":42408,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation","volume":"52 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22104917231176573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: As the number of annual total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures increases the number of revision surgeries will continue to increase. Several prior studies have identified various mechanisms of TKA failure and reported a number of reasons as the most common causes. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the causes of revision TKA at a single institution and to compare those reasons with previously published data in order to provide a current update on the topic. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing TKA revision by board-certified surgeons at a single institution between January 2, 2014 and October 16, 2020 was conducted. Statistical analysis was performed to identify trends among revision reasons and compare postoperative outcomes. Results: Of the 548 patients, 179 (32.7%) had an early revision and 369 (67.3%) had a late revision. The most common causes for early revision were infection (31.3%), loosening (27.4%), and instability (10.1%). The most common causes for late revision were loosening (29.5%), infection (22.2%), and polyethylene wear (20.3%). Postoperatively, there were no significant differences in OR time, length of stay, discharge status, 30-day readmission rates, or 30-day emergency department return rates between early and late revisions. Discussion: This study demonstrated the main causes for revision at a high-volume orthopedic joint replacement center. The most common reasons for revision were infection, loosening, instability, and polyethylene wear. This data in comparison to studies in the past suggests that the causes of revision are constantly evolving and need to be reassessed periodically in order to align focus on improvement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全膝关节置换术翻修原因的趋势
引言:随着每年全膝关节置换术(TKA)手术数量的增加,翻修手术的数量将继续增加。先前的一些研究已经确定了TKA失败的各种机制,并报告了一些最常见的原因。本综述的目的是评估单个机构修订TKA的原因,并将这些原因与先前发表的数据进行比较,以便提供有关该主题的最新信息。方法:回顾性分析2014年1月2日至2020年10月16日在同一家机构接受TKA翻修术的所有患者。进行统计分析以确定翻修原因的趋势并比较术后结果。结果:548例患者中,早期翻修179例(32.7%),晚期翻修369例(67.3%)。早期翻修最常见的原因是感染(31.3%)、松动(27.4%)和不稳定(10.1%)。延迟翻修最常见的原因是松动(29.5%)、感染(22.2%)和聚乙烯磨损(20.3%)。术后,在手术时间、住院时间、出院状态、30天再入院率或30天急诊科复诊率方面,早期和晚期的修改没有显著差异。讨论:本研究展示了在大容量骨科关节置换中心进行翻修的主要原因。最常见的翻修原因是感染、松动、不稳定和聚乙烯磨损。与过去的研究相比,这一数据表明,修订的原因在不断发展,需要定期重新评估,以便将重点放在改进上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ultrasonic measurement for the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome: A study in the Hong Kong Chinese population The surgical outcome of postoperative radial neck nonunion: Retrospective case series with systematic review Tip-to-apex distance does not predict fixation failure regardless of reduction quality in intra-capsular neck of femur fractures treated with femoral neck system Real world patient-reported and health care professional-perceived pain severity in outpatient fracture clinic procedures Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on sports and arthroscopic surgery in local hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1