Amniopatch as an active treatment of spontaneous previable rupture of membranes

V. Ferianec, M. Križko, M. Gábor, P. Papcun, Martin Alföldi, Michaela Feriancová
{"title":"Amniopatch as an active treatment of spontaneous previable rupture of membranes","authors":"V. Ferianec, M. Križko, M. Gábor, P. Papcun, Martin Alföldi, Michaela Feriancová","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2022.2072723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective To assess the use of amniopatch – intraamniotic application of maternal platelets and cryoprecipitate, in patients after spontaneous previable rupture of membranes (sPPPROM) in terms of its effect on the course and outcome of pregnancy in the largest cohort so far. Since the amniopatch is currently used only to treat patients with iatrogenic preterm rupture of membranes, aim of this study was to find out, if amniopatch could be also used in case of sPPPROM as a safe alternative to currently used expectant management and to compare the results with published data on expectant management. Methods The study included 53 patients with single-fetal pregnancy after sPPPROM who underwent amniopatch as an experimental method in the years 2008–2019. Authors evaluated individual characteristics for the whole group as well as a subgroup of live-born neonates who survived to discharge and abortions/live-born infants who did not survive to discharge. Results The mean time of sPPPROM was 19 + 3 gestational week (gw) and of amniopatch performance 22 + 0 gw. Across the group, the miscarriage rate was 33.96%, survival rate 66.03%, mortality rate after delivery 8.57%, survival rate to discharge 60.37%. The mean time of latency period was 5 + 3 gw in the total group, 7 + 1 gw in the group of live births who survived to discharge. We did not find any maternal/fetal complications related directly to amniopatch procedure. Conclusion Amniopatch is a safe treatment alternative in patients with sPPPROM who require an active approach. It is associated with high percentage of a success rate in terms of duration of pregnancy and neonatal survival. In order to elucidate the possible mechanism of amniopatch effect in sPPPROM despite failure of complete sealing of membrane defect, authors give novel hypothesis of antimicrobial effect of amniopatch based on literature data.","PeriodicalId":22921,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"20 1","pages":"9900 - 9906"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2022.2072723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Objective To assess the use of amniopatch – intraamniotic application of maternal platelets and cryoprecipitate, in patients after spontaneous previable rupture of membranes (sPPPROM) in terms of its effect on the course and outcome of pregnancy in the largest cohort so far. Since the amniopatch is currently used only to treat patients with iatrogenic preterm rupture of membranes, aim of this study was to find out, if amniopatch could be also used in case of sPPPROM as a safe alternative to currently used expectant management and to compare the results with published data on expectant management. Methods The study included 53 patients with single-fetal pregnancy after sPPPROM who underwent amniopatch as an experimental method in the years 2008–2019. Authors evaluated individual characteristics for the whole group as well as a subgroup of live-born neonates who survived to discharge and abortions/live-born infants who did not survive to discharge. Results The mean time of sPPPROM was 19 + 3 gestational week (gw) and of amniopatch performance 22 + 0 gw. Across the group, the miscarriage rate was 33.96%, survival rate 66.03%, mortality rate after delivery 8.57%, survival rate to discharge 60.37%. The mean time of latency period was 5 + 3 gw in the total group, 7 + 1 gw in the group of live births who survived to discharge. We did not find any maternal/fetal complications related directly to amniopatch procedure. Conclusion Amniopatch is a safe treatment alternative in patients with sPPPROM who require an active approach. It is associated with high percentage of a success rate in terms of duration of pregnancy and neonatal survival. In order to elucidate the possible mechanism of amniopatch effect in sPPPROM despite failure of complete sealing of membrane defect, authors give novel hypothesis of antimicrobial effect of amniopatch based on literature data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
羊膜贴片作为一种积极的治疗自发性预先膜破裂
摘要目的评价羊膜贴片-羊膜内应用母体血小板和低温沉淀对自发性早破膜(sPPPROM)患者妊娠过程和结局的影响。由于羊膜贴片目前仅用于治疗医源性胎膜早破患者,本研究的目的是了解羊膜贴片是否也可以用于sPPPROM,作为目前使用的预期治疗的安全替代方案,并将结果与已发表的预期治疗数据进行比较。方法本研究纳入2008-2019年53例sPPPROM后单胎妊娠患者,采用羊膜贴作为实验方法。作者评估了整个组的个体特征,以及活产新生儿存活到出院和流产/活产婴儿未存活到出院的亚组。结果sPPPROM的平均时间为19 + 3妊娠周(gw),羊膜贴片的平均时间为22 + 0妊娠周(gw)。流产率33.96%,生存率66.03%,产后死亡率8.57%,出院生存率60.37%。总组平均潜伏期为5 + 3gw,活产组平均潜伏期为7 + 1gw。我们没有发现任何与羊膜贴手术直接相关的母胎并发症。结论羊膜贴片对sPPPROM患者是一种安全的治疗选择。在妊娠期和新生儿存活率方面,它与高成功率有关。为了阐明在膜缺陷未完全密封的情况下羊膜贴片作用的可能机制,作者在文献资料的基础上提出了羊膜贴片抗菌作用的新假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of specialty training and physician attitudes on fetal cardiac counseling Fetoplacental unit involvement in uric acid production in women with severe preeclampsia: a prospective case control pilot study. Causal association of sex hormone-binding globulin on gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study Targeted metabolomic analysis of early-trimester serum identifies potential mechanisms for late-onset preeclampsia Statement of retraction: effect of daily consumption of probiotic yoghurt on lipid profiles in pregnant women: a randomized controlled clinical trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1