Downhole Steam Generation for Green Heavy Oil Recovery

Abdulsallam Al-Mashrafi, M. Fani, F. Asfand, M. Amani, M. Assadi, Nader Mosavat
{"title":"Downhole Steam Generation for Green Heavy Oil Recovery","authors":"Abdulsallam Al-Mashrafi, M. Fani, F. Asfand, M. Amani, M. Assadi, Nader Mosavat","doi":"10.2118/207597-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The ultimate target of heavy oil recovery is to enhance oil mobility by transferring steam's thermal energy to the oil phase, incrementing its temperature, and reducing heavy oil's viscosity. While the various types of steam floods such as Cyclic Steam Injection (CSI) and Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) are widely used worldwide, they have certain limitations that need further improvements. Notably, in surface steam generation systems, downhole steam quality is around 70% which means that 30% of latent heat is lost while steam travels from the surface to the pre-determined downhole location.\n Downhole steam generation (DHSG) can be a viable alternative for the surface steam injection in which steam will be generated downhole instead of on the surface. The asserted method presents significant benefits such as preventing steam quality loss, decreasing the environmental effects, and enhancing the heavy oil recovery by co-injecting the flue gas products such as CO2, and consequently, the economic outcomes will be increased.\n In this research, a comprehensive techno-economic case study has been conducted on a heavy oil reservoir to evaluate the economic and technical advantages of DHSG compared to surface steam generation. Various technical expenses and revenues such as investment costs, operating costs, royalties, and taxes have been considered in a simulation model in MATLAB. This DHSG feasibility assessment has been performed using data of a heavy oil reserve currently under steam flood. Results showed that DHSG could increase up to 50% economic and technical interest than conventional steam injection projects. One of the outstanding benefits of DHSG is the reduction of heat loss. Since steam is produced in-situ, either downhole or in the reservoir, no waste of heat occurs. Typically, most heat losses happen on surface lines and wellbore during steam injection from the surface, which accounts for approximately 32%. Thus, this issue is excluded using the DHSG method.\n The results of the recent effort fit well into the current industry's requirements. DHSG can (1) increase the rate of heavy oil production, (2) decrease the extra expenses, and (3) dwindle the environmental side effects of CO2 emission of surface steam generation. Compared with conventional thermal methods, in DHSG, the steam to oil ratio remains constant with depth change while the desired steam quality can be achieved at any location. The asserted benefits can ultimately optimize the steam injection with a significant reduction in UTC, hence, improved profitability.","PeriodicalId":10967,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, November 15, 2021","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, November 15, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/207597-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ultimate target of heavy oil recovery is to enhance oil mobility by transferring steam's thermal energy to the oil phase, incrementing its temperature, and reducing heavy oil's viscosity. While the various types of steam floods such as Cyclic Steam Injection (CSI) and Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) are widely used worldwide, they have certain limitations that need further improvements. Notably, in surface steam generation systems, downhole steam quality is around 70% which means that 30% of latent heat is lost while steam travels from the surface to the pre-determined downhole location. Downhole steam generation (DHSG) can be a viable alternative for the surface steam injection in which steam will be generated downhole instead of on the surface. The asserted method presents significant benefits such as preventing steam quality loss, decreasing the environmental effects, and enhancing the heavy oil recovery by co-injecting the flue gas products such as CO2, and consequently, the economic outcomes will be increased. In this research, a comprehensive techno-economic case study has been conducted on a heavy oil reservoir to evaluate the economic and technical advantages of DHSG compared to surface steam generation. Various technical expenses and revenues such as investment costs, operating costs, royalties, and taxes have been considered in a simulation model in MATLAB. This DHSG feasibility assessment has been performed using data of a heavy oil reserve currently under steam flood. Results showed that DHSG could increase up to 50% economic and technical interest than conventional steam injection projects. One of the outstanding benefits of DHSG is the reduction of heat loss. Since steam is produced in-situ, either downhole or in the reservoir, no waste of heat occurs. Typically, most heat losses happen on surface lines and wellbore during steam injection from the surface, which accounts for approximately 32%. Thus, this issue is excluded using the DHSG method. The results of the recent effort fit well into the current industry's requirements. DHSG can (1) increase the rate of heavy oil production, (2) decrease the extra expenses, and (3) dwindle the environmental side effects of CO2 emission of surface steam generation. Compared with conventional thermal methods, in DHSG, the steam to oil ratio remains constant with depth change while the desired steam quality can be achieved at any location. The asserted benefits can ultimately optimize the steam injection with a significant reduction in UTC, hence, improved profitability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绿色稠油开采井下蒸汽发生技术
稠油开采的最终目标是通过将蒸汽的热能传递到油相,提高油相的温度,降低稠油的粘度,从而提高油的流动性。虽然循环注蒸汽(CSI)和蒸汽辅助重力泄油(SAGD)等各种类型的蒸汽驱在世界范围内得到广泛应用,但它们存在一定的局限性,需要进一步改进。值得注意的是,在地面蒸汽发生系统中,井下蒸汽质量约为70%,这意味着当蒸汽从地面传播到预定的井下位置时,会损失30%的潜热。井下蒸汽发生(DHSG)是地面注汽的一种可行的替代方案,在这种方法中,蒸汽将在井下产生,而不是在地面产生。所主张的方法具有防止蒸汽质量损失、减少环境影响、通过共注入CO2等烟气产物提高稠油采收率等显著效益,从而提高经济效益。本研究以稠油油藏为研究对象,进行了综合技术经济案例研究,评价了DHSG相对于地面蒸汽发电的经济技术优势。在MATLAB的仿真模型中考虑了各种技术费用和收入,如投资成本、运营成本、特许权使用费和税收。该DHSG可行性评估是利用目前蒸汽驱稠油储量的数据进行的。结果表明,与常规注汽项目相比,DHSG可提高50%以上的经济效益和技术效益。DHSG的突出优点之一是减少热量损失。由于蒸汽是就地产生的,无论是在井下还是在储层中,都不会产生热量浪费。通常情况下,在地面注汽过程中,大部分热损失发生在地面管线和井筒上,约占32%。因此,使用DHSG方法排除了该问题。最近努力的结果很好地符合当前行业的要求。DHSG可以(1)提高稠油采收率,(2)降低额外费用,(3)减少地表蒸汽产生CO2排放对环境的副作用。与常规热法相比,DHSG的蒸汽油比随深度变化保持不变,且在任何位置均可获得理想的蒸汽质量。所宣称的好处最终可以优化蒸汽注入,显著降低UTC,从而提高盈利能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Produced Water Reuse for Drilling and Completion Fluids Using Ion Exchange Resins Human Factors in HSE Performance – Role of User-Friendly HSE Documentation How Do Bankruptcies in the Shale Sector Induce Operators to Focus on Value Creation? Unconventional Waste & Flare Gas Recovery System UFGRS in New Circular Economy Transformation Management Office as a Vehicle to Accelerate Digital Transformation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1