LEARNER-DRIVEN ORAL ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR ENGLISH PRESENTATION

IF 0.5 Q3 AREA STUDIES Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS) Pub Date : 2019-06-29 DOI:10.24200/JONUS.VOL4ISS1PP365-383
Mardiana Idris, A. Raof
{"title":"LEARNER-DRIVEN ORAL ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR ENGLISH PRESENTATION","authors":"Mardiana Idris, A. Raof","doi":"10.24200/JONUS.VOL4ISS1PP365-383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learner-centred assessment has been widely propagated in learner-centred approach. However, learners are rarely given the opportunity to engineer their own assessment. Therefore, this study attempted to gauge (1) the functionality of learner-driven oral assessment criteria scaling structure and (2) the reliability of learner-assessors in applying their own assessment criteria during oral presentation. In this study, 11 participants from an electrical engineering group, which consists of one year programme matriculation students, participated in assessment criteria development. First, participants discussed suitable criteria and scaling structure in small groups. Secondly, each group presented their oral assessment criteria for peer feedback. Thirdly, participants discussed and finalised the oral assessment criteria for the class. Fourthly, to test the learner-driven assessment criteria, three speakers from the group volunteered to present their speech. While presenting, these speakers were assessed by their peers. Participants’ ratings and scores were later analysed using the Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (MFRM) software. Findings show that despite the criteria being developed by learners, the scaling structures were functioning usefully with the Rasch Threshold measure indicated more than 1.4 logits between assessment levels and the learner-assessor reliability was > 0.80. The significance of this study lies in raising awareness for improving learners’ oral presentation skills as well as developing learner autonomy. Keywords: Learner autonomy, learner-centred, oral skills, Rasch measurement. Cite as: Idris, M. & Abdul Raof, A. H. (2019). Learner-driven oral assessment criteria for English presentation. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 4(1), 365-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol4iss1pp365-383","PeriodicalId":16687,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS)","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24200/JONUS.VOL4ISS1PP365-383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Learner-centred assessment has been widely propagated in learner-centred approach. However, learners are rarely given the opportunity to engineer their own assessment. Therefore, this study attempted to gauge (1) the functionality of learner-driven oral assessment criteria scaling structure and (2) the reliability of learner-assessors in applying their own assessment criteria during oral presentation. In this study, 11 participants from an electrical engineering group, which consists of one year programme matriculation students, participated in assessment criteria development. First, participants discussed suitable criteria and scaling structure in small groups. Secondly, each group presented their oral assessment criteria for peer feedback. Thirdly, participants discussed and finalised the oral assessment criteria for the class. Fourthly, to test the learner-driven assessment criteria, three speakers from the group volunteered to present their speech. While presenting, these speakers were assessed by their peers. Participants’ ratings and scores were later analysed using the Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (MFRM) software. Findings show that despite the criteria being developed by learners, the scaling structures were functioning usefully with the Rasch Threshold measure indicated more than 1.4 logits between assessment levels and the learner-assessor reliability was > 0.80. The significance of this study lies in raising awareness for improving learners’ oral presentation skills as well as developing learner autonomy. Keywords: Learner autonomy, learner-centred, oral skills, Rasch measurement. Cite as: Idris, M. & Abdul Raof, A. H. (2019). Learner-driven oral assessment criteria for English presentation. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 4(1), 365-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol4iss1pp365-383
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以学习者为导向的英语演讲口头评价标准
以学习者为中心的评价在以学习者为中心的方法中得到了广泛的推广。然而,学习者很少有机会设计他们自己的评估。因此,本研究试图衡量(1)学习者驱动的口头评估标准量表结构的功能和(2)学习者-评估者在口头陈述中应用自己的评估标准的可靠性。在这项研究中,来自电气工程小组的11名参与者,包括一年制课程预科学生,参与了评估标准的制定。首先,与会者以小组为单位讨论了合适的标准和分级结构。其次,每个小组提出了他们的口头评估标准,以供同行反馈。第三,与会者讨论并最终确定了班级的口头评估标准。第四,为了测试学习者驱动的评估标准,小组中有三位演讲者自愿发言。在演讲时,这些演讲者要接受同行的评估。参与者的评级和分数随后使用多面拉赫测量(MFRM)软件进行分析。研究结果表明,尽管学习者正在制定标准,但量表结构仍然有效,Rasch阈值测量显示评估水平之间的logits大于1.4,学习者-评估者信度> 0.80。本研究的意义在于提高学习者口头表达能力的意识,培养学习者的自主性。关键词:学习者自主,以学习者为中心,口语技能,Rasch测量引用自:Idris, M. & Abdul Raof, A. H.(2019)。以学习者为导向的英语演讲口头评价标准。自然科学学报,34(1),368 - 368。http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol4iss1pp365-383
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
“GREETINGS FROM HELL (NERAKA KIRIM SALAM)”: A DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF RELIGIOUS-BASED CYBERBULLYING OF DEHIJABIS IMPLEMENTING MONETARY POLICY WITH APPLICATION OF SUKUK: CHALLENGES AND POLICY DIRECTIONS CHALLENGES AND GENDER DIFFERENCES IN IMPLEMENTING GAMIFICATION APPROACH AMONG VOCATIONAL COLLEGE LECTURERS IN MALAYSIA THE CONSTRUCTION AND NEGOTIATION OF AGENTIVE IDENTITY: A CASE STUDY OF A MALAYSIAN STUDENT HEURISTIC ANALYSIS OF THE NATIVE LANGUAGE CURRICULUM OF SUCCESSFUL COUNTRIES IN PISA AND TURKEY BY USING ANFIS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1