Comparison of central vein pressure between distal, medial, and proximal lumens with water manometer method

Cornellius Hendra Purnama Aria Sumantrie, B. Semedi, B. Purwanto
{"title":"Comparison of central vein pressure between distal, medial, and proximal lumens with water manometer method","authors":"Cornellius Hendra Purnama Aria Sumantrie, B. Semedi, B. Purwanto","doi":"10.30651/JQM.V5I2.5356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Catheter Vein Pressure in ward-cared patients is rarely measured and considered invalid. The two catheter vein pressure postulates contradict, making confusion among health workers. Dr Russo said the distal-medial-proximal Catheter Vein Pressure has no difference but were denied by Susan S. Scott. Proof of postulate is needed as a solution to inward care. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the central vein pressure between distal, medial, and proximal lumens with the water manometer method. Forty-nine samples retrospective study were taken from the distal - medial - proximal Catheter Vein Pressure of the \"zero\" until fifth days. The differences are analyzed with Statistical Paired t Test with p-Value < 0.05 from SPSS ver. 26 to prove the right postulate. 49 samples were concluded to represent of population. Catheter Vein Pressure from day \"zero\" becomes zero difference, the fifth day 91.8% are no difference while the rest have difference of 0.2 - 1.0 cm H2O and the conclusion are no significant difference with 95% CI. The correlation scale of 0.998 and 0.999 proves that the three lumens tend to produce no differences. In conclusion, the distal - medial - proximal Catheter Vein Pressure values in this study have no significant differences and consistent from \"zero\" until fifth days. This is formulated as P distal = P medial = P proximal (cm H2O). Keywords      : Central Vein Pressure, Pressure, distal - medial - proximal, no differences, ward patient. Correspondence    : sumantrie_medicalgp@yahoo.com","PeriodicalId":31682,"journal":{"name":"Qanun Medika Jurnal Kedokteran Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qanun Medika Jurnal Kedokteran Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30651/JQM.V5I2.5356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Catheter Vein Pressure in ward-cared patients is rarely measured and considered invalid. The two catheter vein pressure postulates contradict, making confusion among health workers. Dr Russo said the distal-medial-proximal Catheter Vein Pressure has no difference but were denied by Susan S. Scott. Proof of postulate is needed as a solution to inward care. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the central vein pressure between distal, medial, and proximal lumens with the water manometer method. Forty-nine samples retrospective study were taken from the distal - medial - proximal Catheter Vein Pressure of the "zero" until fifth days. The differences are analyzed with Statistical Paired t Test with p-Value < 0.05 from SPSS ver. 26 to prove the right postulate. 49 samples were concluded to represent of population. Catheter Vein Pressure from day "zero" becomes zero difference, the fifth day 91.8% are no difference while the rest have difference of 0.2 - 1.0 cm H2O and the conclusion are no significant difference with 95% CI. The correlation scale of 0.998 and 0.999 proves that the three lumens tend to produce no differences. In conclusion, the distal - medial - proximal Catheter Vein Pressure values in this study have no significant differences and consistent from "zero" until fifth days. This is formulated as P distal = P medial = P proximal (cm H2O). Keywords      : Central Vein Pressure, Pressure, distal - medial - proximal, no differences, ward patient. Correspondence    : sumantrie_medicalgp@yahoo.com
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水压计法测定远、中、近端管腔中心静脉压力的比较
在病房监护的患者中,很少测量导管静脉压力,并认为其无效。两种导管静脉压力假设相互矛盾,使卫生工作者感到困惑。Russo医生说远端-中端-近端导管静脉压力没有区别,但被Susan S. Scott否认。为了解决内心的忧虑,需要假设的证明。因此,本研究旨在用水压计法比较远端、中端和近端管腔之间的中心静脉压力。回顾性研究49个样本从远端-中端-近端取导管静脉压为“零”直至第五天。采用SPSS统计软件的配对t检验,p值< 0.05。证明正确的假设。49个样本代表总体。导管静脉压从“0”天开始变为零差,第5天91.8%无差异,其余相差0.2 ~ 1.0 cm H2O,结论差异无统计学意义,95% CI。0.998和0.999的相关尺度证明三个流明趋向于不产生差异。综上所述,本研究中远端、内端和近端导管静脉压力值无显著差异,从“零”一直持续到第5天。公式为P远端= P内侧= P近端(cm H2O)。关键词:中心静脉压力,压力,远端-中端-近端,无差异,病房病人。通信:sumantrie_medicalgp@yahoo.com
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Unusual Laryngeal Foreign Body in Adult: Denture CRISPR-Cas9 through AAV delivery system as a gene therapy in Parkinson’s disease An overview of anxiety levels of Muhammadiyah citizens against COVID-19 vaccination in Surabaya Relationship of genetic factors to the degree of Acne vulgaris as one of the predisposing factors in student Faculty of Medicine University of Muhammadiyah Malang Seroprevalence of Galactomannan Aspergillus in COVID-19 patients in Jakarta: A challenge in the pandemic commotion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1