M. Marchand, Y. Saint-Drenan, L. Saboret, E. Wey, L. Wald
{"title":"Performance of CAMS Radiation Service and HelioClim-3 databases of solar radiation at surface: evaluating the spatial variation in Germany","authors":"M. Marchand, Y. Saint-Drenan, L. Saboret, E. Wey, L. Wald","doi":"10.5194/asr-17-143-2020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The present work deals with the spatial consistency of two well-known\ndatabases of solar radiation received at ground level: the CAMS Radiation\nService database version 3.2, abbreviated as CAMS-Rad and the HelioClim-3\ndatabase version 5, abbreviated as HC3v5. Both databases are derived from\nsatellite images. They are validated against 10 min means of irradiance for\nthe period 2010–2018 recorded in a network of 26 ground stations in Germany\noperated by the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD). For the CAMS-Rad database, the\ncorrelation coefficient between ground measurements and estimates ranges\nbetween 0.83 and 0.92 for all sky conditions. The bias ranges from −41 \nand 32 W m −2 ( −11 % and 10 % of the mean irradiance). The\nstandard deviation ranges between 89 and 129 W m −2 (25 % and\n39 %). For the HC3v5 database, the correlation coefficient ranges between\n0.90 and 0.95. The bias and the standard deviation are comprised between\n −22 and 16 W m −2 ( −6 % and 5 %), and between respectively\n70 and 104 W m −2 (20 % and 31 %). For the CAMS Rad database,\noverestimation is observed in the South, and underestimation in the North\nwith a faint tendency of the bias to increase from East to West. For the\nHC3v5 database, the bias is fairly homogeneous across Germany. For both\ndatabases, there is no noticeable spatial trend in the standard deviation.","PeriodicalId":30081,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Science and Research","volume":"85 1","pages":"143-152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Science and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-17-143-2020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
Abstract. The present work deals with the spatial consistency of two well-known
databases of solar radiation received at ground level: the CAMS Radiation
Service database version 3.2, abbreviated as CAMS-Rad and the HelioClim-3
database version 5, abbreviated as HC3v5. Both databases are derived from
satellite images. They are validated against 10 min means of irradiance for
the period 2010–2018 recorded in a network of 26 ground stations in Germany
operated by the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD). For the CAMS-Rad database, the
correlation coefficient between ground measurements and estimates ranges
between 0.83 and 0.92 for all sky conditions. The bias ranges from −41
and 32 W m −2 ( −11 % and 10 % of the mean irradiance). The
standard deviation ranges between 89 and 129 W m −2 (25 % and
39 %). For the HC3v5 database, the correlation coefficient ranges between
0.90 and 0.95. The bias and the standard deviation are comprised between
−22 and 16 W m −2 ( −6 % and 5 %), and between respectively
70 and 104 W m −2 (20 % and 31 %). For the CAMS Rad database,
overestimation is observed in the South, and underestimation in the North
with a faint tendency of the bias to increase from East to West. For the
HC3v5 database, the bias is fairly homogeneous across Germany. For both
databases, there is no noticeable spatial trend in the standard deviation.