‘I can tell when you’re staring at my glass …’: self- or co-surveillance? Couples’ management of risks related to alcohol use during pregnancy

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Risk & Society Pub Date : 2019-10-29 DOI:10.1080/13698575.2019.1682126
R. Hammer
{"title":"‘I can tell when you’re staring at my glass …’: self- or co-surveillance? Couples’ management of risks related to alcohol use during pregnancy","authors":"R. Hammer","doi":"10.1080/13698575.2019.1682126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social researchers have largely used the framework of self-surveillance to describe the experience of pregnant women within a social context characterised by risk avoidance for the sake of their baby. However, men’s positions regarding the risk discourses surrounding alcohol use during pregnancy and their engagement in their partners’ regulation of abstinence remain unclear. Using a socio-cultural approach to risk perception, this study contributes to the understanding of the lay management of health-related risk as a relational issue by considering the couple relationship as a significant context that shapes responses to risk in everyday life. In this article, I explore the woman’s and her partner’s management of the risks surrounding alcohol consumption during pregnancy. This study draws on joint interviews with 30 first-time expectant couples conducted in 2014 in Switzerland. I found that all the women’s changes of their drinking had been their personal choice and had been seldom discussed with their partners. While women’s responses to risk discourses reflected their engagement in self-surveillance, most of the men were actively involved in their partners’ self-regulation, in terms of support for the transition to abstinence, endorsement of maternal responsibility, and monitoring the woman’s behaviour. I show that the management of the risks related to alcohol consumption was a matter of co-surveillance, rather than of self-surveillance. Although co-surveillance was most often experienced as shared responsibility, some couples experienced conflicts that emphasised the moral meaning of risk related to alcohol consumption during pregnancy.","PeriodicalId":47341,"journal":{"name":"Health Risk & Society","volume":"33 1","pages":"335 - 351"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Risk & Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2019.1682126","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Social researchers have largely used the framework of self-surveillance to describe the experience of pregnant women within a social context characterised by risk avoidance for the sake of their baby. However, men’s positions regarding the risk discourses surrounding alcohol use during pregnancy and their engagement in their partners’ regulation of abstinence remain unclear. Using a socio-cultural approach to risk perception, this study contributes to the understanding of the lay management of health-related risk as a relational issue by considering the couple relationship as a significant context that shapes responses to risk in everyday life. In this article, I explore the woman’s and her partner’s management of the risks surrounding alcohol consumption during pregnancy. This study draws on joint interviews with 30 first-time expectant couples conducted in 2014 in Switzerland. I found that all the women’s changes of their drinking had been their personal choice and had been seldom discussed with their partners. While women’s responses to risk discourses reflected their engagement in self-surveillance, most of the men were actively involved in their partners’ self-regulation, in terms of support for the transition to abstinence, endorsement of maternal responsibility, and monitoring the woman’s behaviour. I show that the management of the risks related to alcohol consumption was a matter of co-surveillance, rather than of self-surveillance. Although co-surveillance was most often experienced as shared responsibility, some couples experienced conflicts that emphasised the moral meaning of risk related to alcohol consumption during pregnancy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“当你盯着我的眼镜时,我能看出来……”:自我监控还是共同监控?夫妇对怀孕期间饮酒相关风险的管理
社会研究人员在很大程度上使用了自我监控的框架来描述孕妇在一个以为了孩子而规避风险为特征的社会背景下的经历。然而,男性对怀孕期间饮酒的风险言论以及他们参与伴侣戒酒规定的立场仍不清楚。使用社会文化方法的风险感知,本研究有助于理解健康相关风险的外行管理作为一个关系问题,考虑到夫妻关系作为一个重要的背景下,塑造在日常生活中对风险的反应。在这篇文章中,我探讨了女性和她的伴侣在怀孕期间对饮酒风险的管理。本研究基于2014年在瑞士对30对首次怀孕夫妇的联合访谈。我发现,所有女性饮酒的变化都是她们自己的选择,很少与伴侣讨论。虽然女性对风险话语的反应反映了她们对自我监督的参与,但大多数男性都积极参与到伴侣的自我调节中,包括支持向禁欲过渡,认可母性责任,以及监督女性的行为。我表明,与饮酒有关的风险管理是共同监督的问题,而不是自我监督的问题。虽然共同监督通常是一种共同责任,但一些夫妇经历了冲突,强调了怀孕期间饮酒风险的道德意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Health Risk & Society is an international scholarly journal devoted to a theoretical and empirical understanding of the social processes which influence the ways in which health risks are taken, communicated, assessed and managed. Public awareness of risk is associated with the development of high profile media debates about specific risks. Although risk issues arise in a variety of areas, such as technological usage and the environment, they are particularly evident in health. Not only is health a major issue of personal and collective concern, but failure to effectively assess and manage risk is likely to result in health problems.
期刊最新文献
Risk factors for mental health and wellness: children’s perspectives from five Majority World Countries The role of trust in government and risk perception in adherence to COVID-19 prevention measures: survey findings among young people in Luxembourg Reassessing social trust: gossip, self-policing, and Covid-19 risk communication in Norway Organisational learning, or organised irresponsibility? Risk, opacity and lesson learning about mental health related deaths The “risk object” of cannabis edibles: perspectives from young adults in Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1