Integrating online and offline channels for online customer loyalty: the moderating role of retailer credibility

Tianyi Ma, Xia Wu, Yang Li
{"title":"Integrating online and offline channels for online customer loyalty: the moderating role of retailer credibility","authors":"Tianyi Ma, Xia Wu, Yang Li","doi":"10.1108/itp-06-2021-0441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeUnderstanding customer behavior from the perspective of channel integration has become a major stream of research in multi-channel retailing literature. Yet, despite recent advancements in scholarship, how retailers can most effectively sustain customers in online retailing remains unclear. Scholars have suggested online–offline channel integration (OOCI) as an effective multi-channel approach for increasing online loyalty; yet, few studies have explored OOCI's influencing mechanism. This study addresses that gap by investigating how OOCI helps achieve customer loyalty online and further examines the moderating role of retailer credibility in the influencing mechanism of OOCI.Design/methodology/approachThe research model driving this study draws upon the stimulus-organism-response (S-O-R) model and cue consistency theory. The authors collected a sample of 259 customers in China with experience making multi-channel purchases from retailers that have implemented OOCI in online retailing. Structural equation modeling and response surface analyses were employed to conduct data analysis.FindingsThe results revealed that the relationship between OOCI and customers' online channel loyalty was mediated by customers' perceptions of the usefulness and risks of online channel usage. The results also found that congruence and incongruence between informational OOCI (IOOCI) and fulfillment OOCI (FOOCI) had different curvilinear associations with perceived online channel usefulness and perceived online channel risk. In addition, retailer credibility weakened the effects of IOOCI on perceived online channel usefulness and FOOCI on perceived online channel risk but strengthened the effect of IOOCI on perceived online channel risk and had no impact on the effect of FOOCI on perceived online channel risk.Originality/valueTheoretical and practical implications of this study are also discussed.","PeriodicalId":13533,"journal":{"name":"Inf. Technol. People","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inf. Technol. People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-06-2021-0441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeUnderstanding customer behavior from the perspective of channel integration has become a major stream of research in multi-channel retailing literature. Yet, despite recent advancements in scholarship, how retailers can most effectively sustain customers in online retailing remains unclear. Scholars have suggested online–offline channel integration (OOCI) as an effective multi-channel approach for increasing online loyalty; yet, few studies have explored OOCI's influencing mechanism. This study addresses that gap by investigating how OOCI helps achieve customer loyalty online and further examines the moderating role of retailer credibility in the influencing mechanism of OOCI.Design/methodology/approachThe research model driving this study draws upon the stimulus-organism-response (S-O-R) model and cue consistency theory. The authors collected a sample of 259 customers in China with experience making multi-channel purchases from retailers that have implemented OOCI in online retailing. Structural equation modeling and response surface analyses were employed to conduct data analysis.FindingsThe results revealed that the relationship between OOCI and customers' online channel loyalty was mediated by customers' perceptions of the usefulness and risks of online channel usage. The results also found that congruence and incongruence between informational OOCI (IOOCI) and fulfillment OOCI (FOOCI) had different curvilinear associations with perceived online channel usefulness and perceived online channel risk. In addition, retailer credibility weakened the effects of IOOCI on perceived online channel usefulness and FOOCI on perceived online channel risk but strengthened the effect of IOOCI on perceived online channel risk and had no impact on the effect of FOOCI on perceived online channel risk.Originality/valueTheoretical and practical implications of this study are also discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
线上线下渠道整合对线上顾客忠诚度的影响:零售商信誉的调节作用
目的从渠道整合的角度理解顾客行为已经成为多渠道零售文献研究的主流。然而,尽管最近在学术研究方面取得了一些进展,零售商如何才能最有效地维持在线零售中的客户仍不清楚。学者们提出线上线下渠道整合(OOCI)是提高在线忠诚度的有效多渠道途径;然而,很少有研究探讨OOCI的影响机制。本研究通过调查OOCI如何帮助实现在线顾客忠诚来弥补这一空白,并进一步研究零售商信誉在OOCI影响机制中的调节作用。设计/方法/方法驱动本研究的研究模型借鉴了刺激-生物-反应(S-O-R)模型和线索一致性理论。作者收集了259名在中国有多渠道购物经验的客户样本,这些客户都是在网上零售中实施OOCI的零售商。采用结构方程建模和响应面分析进行数据分析。结果表明,消费者对网络渠道使用的有用性和风险的认知介导了OOCI与消费者网络渠道忠诚度之间的关系。结果还发现,信息性OOCI (IOOCI)和实现性OOCI (FOOCI)的一致性和不一致性与感知网络渠道有用性和感知网络渠道风险之间存在不同的曲线关联。此外,零售商信誉度削弱了ioooci对感知在线渠道有用性和FOOCI对感知在线渠道风险的影响,但增强了ioooci对感知在线渠道风险的影响,对感知在线渠道风险的影响没有影响。原创性/价值本研究的理论和实践意义也被讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Guest editorial: Work from home (WFH), employee productivity and wellbeing: lessons from COVID-19 and future implications Exploring the impact of digital work on work-life balance and job performance: a technology affordance perspective Exploring the effects of different achievement goals on contributor participation in crowdsourcing Supporting participatory innovation during the COVID-19 pandemic: a comparative study of enterprise social media use Understanding customer's meaningful engagement with AI-powered service robots
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1