An Analysis of Grammatical Errors in Writing Recount Text at the Eighth Grade of SMP Negeri 20 Kota Jambi

Selvia Lisa Asni, Susi Susanti, U. Sulistiyo
{"title":"An Analysis of Grammatical Errors in Writing Recount Text at the Eighth Grade of SMP Negeri 20 Kota Jambi","authors":"Selvia Lisa Asni, Susi Susanti, U. Sulistiyo","doi":"10.22437/IJOLTE.V2I2.5205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze and classify the types or mistakes of students using simple past tense in writing text recount. In addition, this study also aims to determine the cause of errors made by the students using simple past tense in writing text recount, \nThis research used qualitative methods. Meanwhile, the research design used is case study. Furthermore, the writer chose the 8th grade students and observed 26 students. The writer used a written test and interviews to gain the data from some students and an English teacher. \nBased on this research, it is found that students do all kinds of errors (omission, addition, selection and misordering). The type of error most often done by the students was omission error with 166 errors or 38.97%. The second position was a selection error with 162 errors or 38.03%. The third position was the addition error with 67 errors or 15.73%. Then the last position was misordering error with 31 errors or 7.28%. In addition, the errors were caused by the complexity of the English system itself and not because of the influence of the Indonesian system (intralingual transfer). Moreover, students lacked of understanding of the grammar that became the cause of the error. In this study, most students did not understand verb 1,2,3 as well as the proper use if “be” in a sentence. This suggested that students had difficulty with the use of grammar in writing","PeriodicalId":33478,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language Teaching and Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language Teaching and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22437/IJOLTE.V2I2.5205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and classify the types or mistakes of students using simple past tense in writing text recount. In addition, this study also aims to determine the cause of errors made by the students using simple past tense in writing text recount, This research used qualitative methods. Meanwhile, the research design used is case study. Furthermore, the writer chose the 8th grade students and observed 26 students. The writer used a written test and interviews to gain the data from some students and an English teacher. Based on this research, it is found that students do all kinds of errors (omission, addition, selection and misordering). The type of error most often done by the students was omission error with 166 errors or 38.97%. The second position was a selection error with 162 errors or 38.03%. The third position was the addition error with 67 errors or 15.73%. Then the last position was misordering error with 31 errors or 7.28%. In addition, the errors were caused by the complexity of the English system itself and not because of the influence of the Indonesian system (intralingual transfer). Moreover, students lacked of understanding of the grammar that became the cause of the error. In this study, most students did not understand verb 1,2,3 as well as the proper use if “be” in a sentence. This suggested that students had difficulty with the use of grammar in writing
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小学八年级学生写作叙述文本中的语法错误分析
本研究旨在分析和分类学生在撰写文本叙述时使用一般过去时的类型或错误。此外,本研究还旨在确定学生在撰写文本叙述时使用一般过去时产生错误的原因,本研究采用定性方法。同时,研究设计采用个案研究。此外,笔者选择了八年级的学生,观察了26名学生。作者通过笔试和访谈从一些学生和一位英语老师那里获得数据。本研究发现,学生在阅读过程中会出现各种错误(省略、添加、选择、错序)。学生最常犯的错误类型是遗漏错误,共有166个错误,占38.97%。第2位是选择错误,有162个错误(38.03%)。第三位是加法误差,误差为67个,占15.73%。排在最后的位置是错误排序错误,错误31次,占7.28%。此外,这些错误是由英语系统本身的复杂性造成的,而不是由于印尼语系统的影响(语内迁移)。此外,学生对语法的理解不足成为错误的原因。在本研究中,大多数学生不理解动词1、2、3,也不理解“be”在句子中的正确用法。这表明学生在写作中使用语法有困难
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
An investigation into implementing out-of-class English support in one Japanese University. Analysis of the process of small-scale public procurement in the education sector in the Czech Republic Research Results of Time Management Teaching Methods at the Undergraduate Level at TSU First-year University Students’ Experiences in Learning Threshold Concepts of Acids-Bases Chemistry The issue of pedagogical and teaching training of teachers in Greek education and the role of university professors: an educational policy approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1