Aisha R. Faragai, A. Ugwu, Mohammed Hassan, M. Sidi
{"title":"How Knowledgeable are Non-Radiology Doctors on Ionizing Radiation","authors":"Aisha R. Faragai, A. Ugwu, Mohammed Hassan, M. Sidi","doi":"10.48153/jrrs.v33i1.223068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Due to the risk of hazard from ionizing radiation, non-radiology doctors who refer patients to the radiology departments ought to be knowledgeable enough about what their patients are subjected to. The high throughput of radiology requests in our centre in Nigeria justifies this study. \nAim: To evaluate the level of knowledge of non-radiology doctors on ionizing radiation with a view to reviewing local protocols on justification of investigations involving ionizing radiation. \nMaterial and method: Eighty (80) structured questionnaires were administered to non-radiology doctors practising in different hospitals n Kano city, Nigeria. Answers were elicited on radiation protection principles, concept of ionizing radiation, radiation effects, imaging modalities that emit ionizing radiation, radiation measurements and attitude towards ionizing radiation. \nResults: Seventy questionnaires were returned out of the eighty sent out with sixty-four (80 %) being properly filled. Knowledge of non-radiology doctors was variable on different indices; 15.6 %, n = 10 (fundamental principles of radiation protection); 45.3 %, n = 29 (effects of ionizing radiation); 34.4 %, n = 22 (knowledge on ionizing property of radiation); 73 %, n = 47 (emission of ionizing radiation by computed tomography); and 85.9 %, n = 55 (interest in specific modality). \nConclusion: Non-radiology doctors in Kano metropolis have fairly good knowledge of potential hazards of radiation.","PeriodicalId":16919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiography and Radiation Sciences","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiography and Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48153/jrrs.v33i1.223068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Due to the risk of hazard from ionizing radiation, non-radiology doctors who refer patients to the radiology departments ought to be knowledgeable enough about what their patients are subjected to. The high throughput of radiology requests in our centre in Nigeria justifies this study.
Aim: To evaluate the level of knowledge of non-radiology doctors on ionizing radiation with a view to reviewing local protocols on justification of investigations involving ionizing radiation.
Material and method: Eighty (80) structured questionnaires were administered to non-radiology doctors practising in different hospitals n Kano city, Nigeria. Answers were elicited on radiation protection principles, concept of ionizing radiation, radiation effects, imaging modalities that emit ionizing radiation, radiation measurements and attitude towards ionizing radiation.
Results: Seventy questionnaires were returned out of the eighty sent out with sixty-four (80 %) being properly filled. Knowledge of non-radiology doctors was variable on different indices; 15.6 %, n = 10 (fundamental principles of radiation protection); 45.3 %, n = 29 (effects of ionizing radiation); 34.4 %, n = 22 (knowledge on ionizing property of radiation); 73 %, n = 47 (emission of ionizing radiation by computed tomography); and 85.9 %, n = 55 (interest in specific modality).
Conclusion: Non-radiology doctors in Kano metropolis have fairly good knowledge of potential hazards of radiation.
背景:由于电离辐射的危害风险,转介病人到放射科的非放射科医生应该对他们的病人所受的辐射有足够的了解。我们在尼日利亚中心的高通量放射学要求证明了这项研究的合理性。目的:评估非放射科医生对电离辐射的知识水平,以审查当地有关电离辐射调查理由的规定。材料和方法:对尼日利亚卡诺市不同医院的非放射科医生进行了80份结构化问卷调查。与会者就辐射防护原理、电离辐射概念、辐射效应、发射电离辐射的成像方式、辐射测量和对电离辐射的态度等问题作出了回答。结果:共发放问卷80份,回收问卷70份,正确填写64份(80%)。非放射科医生的知识在不同指标上存在差异;15.6%, n = 10(辐射防护基本原理);45.3%, n = 29(电离辐射的影响);34.4%, n = 22(辐射电离特性知识);73%, n = 47(计算机断层扫描电离辐射发射);85.9%, n = 55(对特定模态的兴趣)。结论:卡诺市非放射科医师对辐射的潜在危害有较好的认识。