How Knowledgeable are Non-Radiology Doctors on Ionizing Radiation

Aisha R. Faragai, A. Ugwu, Mohammed Hassan, M. Sidi
{"title":"How Knowledgeable are Non-Radiology Doctors on Ionizing Radiation","authors":"Aisha R. Faragai, A. Ugwu, Mohammed Hassan, M. Sidi","doi":"10.48153/jrrs.v33i1.223068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Due to the risk of hazard from ionizing radiation, non-radiology doctors who refer patients to the radiology departments ought to be knowledgeable enough about what their patients are subjected to. The high throughput of radiology requests in our centre in Nigeria justifies this study. \nAim: To evaluate the level of knowledge of non-radiology doctors on ionizing radiation with a view to reviewing local protocols on justification of investigations involving ionizing radiation. \nMaterial and method: Eighty (80) structured questionnaires were administered to non-radiology doctors practising in different hospitals n Kano city, Nigeria. Answers were elicited on radiation protection principles, concept of ionizing radiation, radiation effects, imaging modalities that emit ionizing radiation, radiation measurements and attitude towards ionizing radiation. \nResults: Seventy questionnaires were returned out of the eighty sent out with sixty-four (80 %) being properly filled. Knowledge of non-radiology doctors was variable on different indices; 15.6 %, n = 10 (fundamental principles of radiation protection); 45.3 %, n = 29 (effects of ionizing radiation); 34.4 %,  n = 22 (knowledge on ionizing property of radiation); 73 %, n = 47 (emission of ionizing radiation by computed tomography); and 85.9 %, n = 55 (interest in specific modality). \nConclusion:  Non-radiology doctors in Kano metropolis have fairly good knowledge of potential hazards of radiation.","PeriodicalId":16919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiography and Radiation Sciences","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiography and Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48153/jrrs.v33i1.223068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Due to the risk of hazard from ionizing radiation, non-radiology doctors who refer patients to the radiology departments ought to be knowledgeable enough about what their patients are subjected to. The high throughput of radiology requests in our centre in Nigeria justifies this study. Aim: To evaluate the level of knowledge of non-radiology doctors on ionizing radiation with a view to reviewing local protocols on justification of investigations involving ionizing radiation. Material and method: Eighty (80) structured questionnaires were administered to non-radiology doctors practising in different hospitals n Kano city, Nigeria. Answers were elicited on radiation protection principles, concept of ionizing radiation, radiation effects, imaging modalities that emit ionizing radiation, radiation measurements and attitude towards ionizing radiation. Results: Seventy questionnaires were returned out of the eighty sent out with sixty-four (80 %) being properly filled. Knowledge of non-radiology doctors was variable on different indices; 15.6 %, n = 10 (fundamental principles of radiation protection); 45.3 %, n = 29 (effects of ionizing radiation); 34.4 %,  n = 22 (knowledge on ionizing property of radiation); 73 %, n = 47 (emission of ionizing radiation by computed tomography); and 85.9 %, n = 55 (interest in specific modality). Conclusion:  Non-radiology doctors in Kano metropolis have fairly good knowledge of potential hazards of radiation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非放射科医生对电离辐射了解多少
背景:由于电离辐射的危害风险,转介病人到放射科的非放射科医生应该对他们的病人所受的辐射有足够的了解。我们在尼日利亚中心的高通量放射学要求证明了这项研究的合理性。目的:评估非放射科医生对电离辐射的知识水平,以审查当地有关电离辐射调查理由的规定。材料和方法:对尼日利亚卡诺市不同医院的非放射科医生进行了80份结构化问卷调查。与会者就辐射防护原理、电离辐射概念、辐射效应、发射电离辐射的成像方式、辐射测量和对电离辐射的态度等问题作出了回答。结果:共发放问卷80份,回收问卷70份,正确填写64份(80%)。非放射科医生的知识在不同指标上存在差异;15.6%, n = 10(辐射防护基本原理);45.3%, n = 29(电离辐射的影响);34.4%, n = 22(辐射电离特性知识);73%, n = 47(计算机断层扫描电离辐射发射);85.9%, n = 55(对特定模态的兴趣)。结论:卡诺市非放射科医师对辐射的潜在危害有较好的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CT features, Pathological findings and Clinical data of Follicular Dendritic Cell Sarcoma in the Mediastinum: Case Report and Literature Review KNOWLEDGE AND PRACTICE OF IMAGING OF CHILDREN WITH SUSPECTED CASES OF NON-ACCIDENTAL INJURIES AMONG RADIOGRAPHERS WITHIN MAIDUGURI METROPOLIS, NORTHEASTERN NIGERIA Effective doses in chest and abdominal radiography following the ICRP recommendations of 1991 and 2007 in a regional hospital. Investigation of the Effect of Solar Panel Temperature on Power Output Efficiency in Brass, Nigeria. An Assessment of the Lead rubber aprons in Radiodiagnostic centres in South-South Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1