Economic evaluation of hazard control technology in a wet process cement plant

IF 1.9 Q3 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI:10.14488/BJOPM.2021.005
O. O. Akinyemi, H. O. Adeyemi, Adeshinaayomi Lawal Akintan, M. Sulaiman, A. O. Sadiq, O. Folorunsho
{"title":"Economic evaluation of hazard control technology in a wet process cement plant","authors":"O. O. Akinyemi, H. O. Adeyemi, Adeshinaayomi Lawal Akintan, M. Sulaiman, A. O. Sadiq, O. Folorunsho","doi":"10.14488/BJOPM.2021.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Goal:  Retrofit technology has been suggested for the reduction of CO2 emission in cement manufacturing but the economic justification of this retrofit technology is rarely or not available. This research study aimed to evaluate the beneficial value of retrofit technology aimed at reducing CO2 emission in a wet process cement plant. \nDesign / Methodology / Approach: Engineering Economic and cost estimation techniques were used to evaluate the overall annual cost of combination of retrofit technology. The overall annual cost of retrofit technology was determined in terms of capital cost, operation and maintenance cost and energy cost savings of retrofit. \nResults: The best strategy to reduce CO2 emission is the combination of adjustable speed drive for kiln; kiln drive efficiency improvement for kiln and process control and management system for kiln at 6% reduction target, giving a cost savings of $520,836 on retrofit for 10years and 1.41% reduction in total cost. \nLimitations of the investigation: Getting adequate plant data in Nigeria was a constraint during the research. \nPractical implications:  The results presented if implemented by Cement plant operators will ensure reduction in the CO2 emission and government can enforce Cement plant operators to adhere to strict environmental and safety regulations while litigations and sanctions can be employed to implements this policy. \nOriginality / Value:  The study established economic justification of retrofit technology for CO2 emission reduction before eventual implementation.","PeriodicalId":54139,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management","volume":"87 17 1","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2021.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Goal:  Retrofit technology has been suggested for the reduction of CO2 emission in cement manufacturing but the economic justification of this retrofit technology is rarely or not available. This research study aimed to evaluate the beneficial value of retrofit technology aimed at reducing CO2 emission in a wet process cement plant. Design / Methodology / Approach: Engineering Economic and cost estimation techniques were used to evaluate the overall annual cost of combination of retrofit technology. The overall annual cost of retrofit technology was determined in terms of capital cost, operation and maintenance cost and energy cost savings of retrofit. Results: The best strategy to reduce CO2 emission is the combination of adjustable speed drive for kiln; kiln drive efficiency improvement for kiln and process control and management system for kiln at 6% reduction target, giving a cost savings of $520,836 on retrofit for 10years and 1.41% reduction in total cost. Limitations of the investigation: Getting adequate plant data in Nigeria was a constraint during the research. Practical implications:  The results presented if implemented by Cement plant operators will ensure reduction in the CO2 emission and government can enforce Cement plant operators to adhere to strict environmental and safety regulations while litigations and sanctions can be employed to implements this policy. Originality / Value:  The study established economic justification of retrofit technology for CO2 emission reduction before eventual implementation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
湿法水泥厂危害控制技术的经济评价
目标:改造技术已被建议用于减少水泥制造中的二氧化碳排放,但这种改造技术的经济理由很少或根本没有。本研究旨在评估湿法水泥厂减少二氧化碳排放的改造技术的有益价值。设计/方法/方法:工程经济和成本估算技术被用于评估改造技术组合的总体年度成本。改造技术的总体年度成本是根据改造的资本成本、运行维护成本和节能成本来确定的。结果:减少CO2排放的最佳策略是结合窑炉调速驱动;窑炉驱动效率的提高,窑炉过程控制和管理系统的降低目标为6%,在10年的改造中节省成本520,836美元,总成本降低1.41%。调查的局限性:在尼日利亚获得足够的植物数据是研究过程中的一个限制。实际意义:如果水泥厂运营商实施,所呈现的结果将确保减少二氧化碳排放,政府可以强制水泥厂运营商遵守严格的环境和安全法规,同时可以采用诉讼和制裁来实施这一政策。原创性/价值:该研究在最终实施之前建立了二氧化碳减排改造技术的经济合理性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
27
审稿时长
44 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sustainability and Operational Excellence opportunities with Industry 4.0, Lean and Circular Economy Analysis of the application of recycled polypropylene Productivity in a pandemic Analysis of product-service system logistics strategies in e-commerce An ERP implementation on a beekeeping and honey value chain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1