Budget impact analysis of empagliflozin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Italy

IF 0.4 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Farmeconomia-Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways Pub Date : 2016-03-31 DOI:10.7175/FE.V17I1.1238
S. Iannazzo, E. Mannucci, L. Mantovani
{"title":"Budget impact analysis of empagliflozin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Italy","authors":"S. Iannazzo, E. Mannucci, L. Mantovani","doi":"10.7175/FE.V17I1.1238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Empagliflozin is the most recent molecule in the SGLT-2i class, new antidiabetic drugs that reduce renal glucose absorption by determining the excretion in the urine. The high prevalence of T2D, the chronicity of the condition and the severe economic and social burden caused by the disease, impose the need for a careful health economic assessment on each therapeutic innovation in this area. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the budget impact of adopting empagliflozin in the diabetic population currently treated with sulfonylureas and potentially eligible for treatment with SGLT-2i. METHODS: The budget impact analysis was conducted from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service over a period of three years, through an analytic model developed in MS Excel. The target population was estimated in about 170,000 patients currently treated with sulfonylureas, based on the growth forecasts of the Italian population, epidemiological estimates and drug-use information available in the literature on diabetes in Italy. In the base case was assumed a replacement rate of sulfonylureas equal to 10%, 20% and 30% respectively at the first, second and third year of analysis. A scenario analysis was considered assuming a constant uptake of 100% since the first year. The following direct healthcare costs were considered: 1) acquisition of antidiabetic drugs as the main therapy and as rescue therapy; 2) self-monitoring of blood glucose; 3) management of severe hypoglycemic events and 4) management of major cardiovascular events. Clinical effectiveness data was based on the published literature and unit costs were derived from current prices and tariffs. Oneway sensitivity analysis was developed to assess the impact of input’s uncertainty on the overall result. RESULTS: The base case analysis presented a substantially neutral impact on the budget. The 3-year cumulative impact was -454.337 €, corresponding to a 0.1% saving. This means that the replacement of sulphonylureas with empagliflozin determines an increase in acquisition costs of drugs, which is entirely offset by the reduction in costs of self-monitoring of blood glucose, management of hypoglycemic events and cardiovascular events. The scenario analysis, based on the assumption of a full substitution of sulphonylureas with empagliflozin at the first year, yielded a more enhanced savings. The cumulative impact was -2.269.517 €, corresponding to a 0.6% saving. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that the replacement of sulfonylureas (a class of generic products) with empagliflozin, motivated by the advantageous efficacy and safety profile, can take place optimizing healthcare expenditure for the management of DT2. [In Italian]","PeriodicalId":41585,"journal":{"name":"Farmeconomia-Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways","volume":"72 1","pages":"19-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmeconomia-Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7175/FE.V17I1.1238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Empagliflozin is the most recent molecule in the SGLT-2i class, new antidiabetic drugs that reduce renal glucose absorption by determining the excretion in the urine. The high prevalence of T2D, the chronicity of the condition and the severe economic and social burden caused by the disease, impose the need for a careful health economic assessment on each therapeutic innovation in this area. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the budget impact of adopting empagliflozin in the diabetic population currently treated with sulfonylureas and potentially eligible for treatment with SGLT-2i. METHODS: The budget impact analysis was conducted from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service over a period of three years, through an analytic model developed in MS Excel. The target population was estimated in about 170,000 patients currently treated with sulfonylureas, based on the growth forecasts of the Italian population, epidemiological estimates and drug-use information available in the literature on diabetes in Italy. In the base case was assumed a replacement rate of sulfonylureas equal to 10%, 20% and 30% respectively at the first, second and third year of analysis. A scenario analysis was considered assuming a constant uptake of 100% since the first year. The following direct healthcare costs were considered: 1) acquisition of antidiabetic drugs as the main therapy and as rescue therapy; 2) self-monitoring of blood glucose; 3) management of severe hypoglycemic events and 4) management of major cardiovascular events. Clinical effectiveness data was based on the published literature and unit costs were derived from current prices and tariffs. Oneway sensitivity analysis was developed to assess the impact of input’s uncertainty on the overall result. RESULTS: The base case analysis presented a substantially neutral impact on the budget. The 3-year cumulative impact was -454.337 €, corresponding to a 0.1% saving. This means that the replacement of sulphonylureas with empagliflozin determines an increase in acquisition costs of drugs, which is entirely offset by the reduction in costs of self-monitoring of blood glucose, management of hypoglycemic events and cardiovascular events. The scenario analysis, based on the assumption of a full substitution of sulphonylureas with empagliflozin at the first year, yielded a more enhanced savings. The cumulative impact was -2.269.517 €, corresponding to a 0.6% saving. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that the replacement of sulfonylureas (a class of generic products) with empagliflozin, motivated by the advantageous efficacy and safety profile, can take place optimizing healthcare expenditure for the management of DT2. [In Italian]
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意大利恩格列净治疗2型糖尿病的预算影响分析
背景:恩格列净是SGLT-2i类中最新的分子,是一种新的降糖药物,通过测定尿液中的排泄来减少肾脏葡萄糖吸收。由于糖尿病的高流行率、病情的长期性以及该病造成的严重经济和社会负担,需要对该领域的每一项治疗创新进行仔细的卫生经济评估。目的:本研究的目的是评估目前接受磺脲类药物治疗的糖尿病人群采用恩格列净的预算影响,这些糖尿病人群可能符合SGLT-2i治疗的条件。方法:通过在MS Excel中开发的分析模型,从意大利国家卫生服务机构的角度进行为期三年的预算影响分析。根据意大利人口增长预测、流行病学估计和意大利糖尿病文献中现有的药物使用信息,估计目标人群为目前接受磺脲类药物治疗的约17万名患者。在基本情况下,假设在分析的第一年、第二年和第三年,磺脲类化合物的替代率分别为10%、20%和30%。假设自第一年以来一直保持100%的吸收率,进行情景分析。主要考虑以下直接医疗费用:1)获得抗糖尿病药物作为主要治疗药物和作为抢救治疗药物;2)自我血糖监测;3)严重低血糖事件的管理和4)主要心血管事件的管理。临床有效性数据基于已发表的文献,单位成本来自当前价格和关税。采用单向敏感性分析来评估输入的不确定性对总体结果的影响。结果:基本案例分析对预算的影响基本上是中性的。3年累计影响为-454.337欧元,相当于节省0.1%。这意味着用恩格列净替代磺脲类药物决定了药物购置成本的增加,而这完全被自我血糖监测、低血糖事件和心血管事件管理成本的降低所抵消。情景分析基于在第一年用恩格列净完全替代磺脲类药物的假设,产生了更大的节省。累计影响为-2.269.517欧元,相当于节省0.6%。结论:本研究表明,以恩格列净替代磺脲类(一类仿制药),在其具有优势的疗效和安全性的激励下,可以优化管理DT2的医疗支出。(意大利)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
The Importance of the Pharmacoeconomic Analyses in Drug Negotiation. A Farewell Editorial [Measurement-Based Procurement Approach for Biosimilars in Italy: A Position Paper] [Burden of Short Bowel Syndrome in Italy: Direct and Indirect Costs and Quality of Life] Cost-effectiveness of Empagliflozin, in Addition to Metformin, in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Italy [Budget Impact Analysis of the Adjuvanted Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in the Elderly in Italy]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1