Method vs. form – an attempt to classify cartographic presentation methods

M. Mazur
{"title":"Method vs. form – an attempt to classify cartographic presentation methods","authors":"M. Mazur","doi":"10.1515/pcr-2017-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The author of the article discusses the subject of terminology in the field of cartographic methodology. The general purpose is to propose an internally consistent system of concepts which allows classification of cartographic presentation methods based on unambiguous criteria. For this purpose, in the article the concept of presentation method and the concept of presentation form were differentiated, the cartographic presentation method was divided into stages, and possible data transformation and visualization aspects during application of a method were specified. Then, review of the previous classifications of cartographic presentation methods was conducted which allows differentiation of two fundamental approaches to classification and comparison of the applied criteria. On this basis, the author’s classification of cartographic presentation methods was suggested in which three qualitative and four quantitative methods were differentiated. It constitutes a compromise between accepting unambiguous criteria and the possibility to differentiate methods fixed in cartographic convention.","PeriodicalId":30929,"journal":{"name":"Polish Cartographical Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"47 - 57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Cartographical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pcr-2017-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The author of the article discusses the subject of terminology in the field of cartographic methodology. The general purpose is to propose an internally consistent system of concepts which allows classification of cartographic presentation methods based on unambiguous criteria. For this purpose, in the article the concept of presentation method and the concept of presentation form were differentiated, the cartographic presentation method was divided into stages, and possible data transformation and visualization aspects during application of a method were specified. Then, review of the previous classifications of cartographic presentation methods was conducted which allows differentiation of two fundamental approaches to classification and comparison of the applied criteria. On this basis, the author’s classification of cartographic presentation methods was suggested in which three qualitative and four quantitative methods were differentiated. It constitutes a compromise between accepting unambiguous criteria and the possibility to differentiate methods fixed in cartographic convention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
方法与形式——对地图呈现方法进行分类的尝试
摘要本文探讨了地图学方法论领域中的术语问题。一般目的是提出一个内部一致的概念系统,允许根据明确的标准对地图表示方法进行分类。为此,本文对表示方法的概念和表示形式的概念进行了区分,将制图表示方法分为几个阶段,并对一种方法在应用过程中可能出现的数据转换和可视化方面进行了说明。然后,对以前的制图表示方法分类进行了审查,从而区分了两种基本的分类方法,并比较了适用的标准。在此基础上,提出了地图呈现方法的分类,其中区分了三种定性方法和四种定量方法。它是在接受明确的标准和区分制图惯例中确定的方法之间的一种妥协。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cartometric analysis of selected works by Leonardo da Vinci Tell me where you are and I’ll tell you what you learn. Investigating hidden curricula using GIS analysis of place names in a case study of an English language textbook published in Japan Methodology for creating dynamic emergency vehicle availability maps Post-1800 copies of Atlas Silesiae: may we talk about the second edition? The first state of Georg Freudenhammer’s map of Palatinatus Posnaniensis from 1645
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1