Contributions of business process management promotion techniques to knowledge management: empirical evidence

IF 1.9 Q3 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management Pub Date : 2020-09-29 DOI:10.14488/bjopm.2020.034
Ana Santos, Silvia Inês Dallavalle de Pádua, R. B. Junior, Emerson Lima Aredes
{"title":"Contributions of business process management promotion techniques to knowledge management: empirical evidence","authors":"Ana Santos, Silvia Inês Dallavalle de Pádua, R. B. Junior, Emerson Lima Aredes","doi":"10.14488/bjopm.2020.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Goal: Knowledge Management (KM) has been increasingly used by organizations to help innovation and gain competitive advantage; however, the implementation of KM may turn in bad results, because of functional isolation. In contrast, Business Process Management (BPM) is an approach that removes functional isolation, establishing end-to-end processes perspective through cycle promotion and usage of management techniques. Therefore, the aim is to understand how the techniques used to promote BPM contribute to KM. \nDesign/ Methodology/ Approach: In step 1, a systematic review of the literature was carried out on the scientific bases, trying to understand how the literature dealt with the relationship between BPM and KM techniques in the last 10 years. In step 2, there was a project to promote BPM in a public hospital. Stage 3 sought to understand the leaders' perceptions about the possible contributions of BPM techniques to KM. \nResults: BPM acts promoting participation and sharing (social aspects); collecting information about the organization and identifies problems (cognitive aspects); allowing decision making to solve problems (strategic aspects); explaining tacit information, organizing and compiling explicit information (technological aspects) in order to enable changes in systems. \nLimitations of the investigation: single case study.      \nPractical implications: BPM project collaborates to expand the diversity of information sources, opens the organization to external knowledge, with external consultant’s participation, also it provides communication expanding between areas, thus, improving customer service. \nOriginality/ Value: this work contributes to show a valuable combination of techniques and how each one contributes to an essential resource as knowledge.","PeriodicalId":54139,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14488/bjopm.2020.034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Goal: Knowledge Management (KM) has been increasingly used by organizations to help innovation and gain competitive advantage; however, the implementation of KM may turn in bad results, because of functional isolation. In contrast, Business Process Management (BPM) is an approach that removes functional isolation, establishing end-to-end processes perspective through cycle promotion and usage of management techniques. Therefore, the aim is to understand how the techniques used to promote BPM contribute to KM. Design/ Methodology/ Approach: In step 1, a systematic review of the literature was carried out on the scientific bases, trying to understand how the literature dealt with the relationship between BPM and KM techniques in the last 10 years. In step 2, there was a project to promote BPM in a public hospital. Stage 3 sought to understand the leaders' perceptions about the possible contributions of BPM techniques to KM. Results: BPM acts promoting participation and sharing (social aspects); collecting information about the organization and identifies problems (cognitive aspects); allowing decision making to solve problems (strategic aspects); explaining tacit information, organizing and compiling explicit information (technological aspects) in order to enable changes in systems. Limitations of the investigation: single case study.      Practical implications: BPM project collaborates to expand the diversity of information sources, opens the organization to external knowledge, with external consultant’s participation, also it provides communication expanding between areas, thus, improving customer service. Originality/ Value: this work contributes to show a valuable combination of techniques and how each one contributes to an essential resource as knowledge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
业务流程管理促进技术对知识管理的贡献:经验证据
目标:知识管理(KM)越来越多地被组织用来帮助创新和获得竞争优势;然而,由于功能隔离,KM的实现可能会带来不好的结果。相比之下,业务流程管理(BPM)是一种消除功能隔离、通过周期提升和管理技术的使用建立端到端流程视角的方法。因此,我们的目标是了解用于促进BPM的技术如何对KM做出贡献。设计/方法论/方法:在第1步中,在科学的基础上对文献进行了系统的回顾,试图理解在过去10年中文献是如何处理BPM和KM技术之间的关系的。step2,有一个在公立医院推广BPM的项目。第三阶段试图了解领导者对BPM技术对知识管理的可能贡献的看法。结果:BPM促进了参与和分享(社交方面);收集有关组织的信息并识别问题(认知方面);允许决策解决问题(战略方面);解释隐性信息,组织和编译显性信息(技术方面),以使系统发生变化。调查的局限性:单一案例研究。实际意义:BPM项目通过协作扩展了信息源的多样性,在外部顾问的参与下,使组织向外部知识开放,还提供了扩展领域之间的通信,从而改善了客户服务。原创性/价值:这项工作有助于展示有价值的技术组合,以及每一种技术如何作为知识的基本资源作出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
27
审稿时长
44 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sustainability and Operational Excellence opportunities with Industry 4.0, Lean and Circular Economy Analysis of the application of recycled polypropylene Productivity in a pandemic Analysis of product-service system logistics strategies in e-commerce An ERP implementation on a beekeeping and honey value chain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1