Sales and operations planning: learnings from 15 Brazilian companies

IF 1.9 Q3 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.14488/BJOPM.2021.019
M. Seeling, C. E. Panitz, R. A. Cassel
{"title":"Sales and operations planning: learnings from 15 Brazilian companies","authors":"M. Seeling, C. E. Panitz, R. A. Cassel","doi":"10.14488/BJOPM.2021.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Goal: The goal of this paper is to investigate 15 Brazilian companies, which execute S&OP cycles periodically, in order to characterize the processes implemented and discuss challenges and improvement opportunities. Design / Methodology / Approach: Initially, a multiple-case study approach is applied embracing 15 Brazilian companies. Then, a survey is conducted in the same organizations to deepen the investigation. Two recognized S&OP frameworks from the literature are used to structure the research. Results: Some of the main research findings include: some companies consider “Data Gathering” a normal task and no longer a S&OP cycle step; some organizations include a new step one named “Portfolio Management”, preceding “Demand Planning” to leverage step two’s outcomes; there are improvement opportunities identified in “Pre-meeting” and “Executive Meeting” steps regarding capacity to simulate different scenarios from a financial perspective; and most of the studied companies do not adopt a S&OP software facing limitations to manage information and perform what-if analysis. Limitations of the investigation: Only companies located in Brazil are investigated. Practical implications: The study provides useful information for practitioners on the characterization of the S&OP process, implementation challenges, and improvement opportunities. Originality / Value: The paper applies different research methods (multiple-case study and survey) and two recognized frameworks from the literature in the study of the S&OP process performed by 15 companies, providing a broad characterization of the processes implemented and valuable findings about challenges and improvement opportunities. Although all the researched companies are Brazilian, evidences indicate the results are generalizable.","PeriodicalId":54139,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2021.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Goal: The goal of this paper is to investigate 15 Brazilian companies, which execute S&OP cycles periodically, in order to characterize the processes implemented and discuss challenges and improvement opportunities. Design / Methodology / Approach: Initially, a multiple-case study approach is applied embracing 15 Brazilian companies. Then, a survey is conducted in the same organizations to deepen the investigation. Two recognized S&OP frameworks from the literature are used to structure the research. Results: Some of the main research findings include: some companies consider “Data Gathering” a normal task and no longer a S&OP cycle step; some organizations include a new step one named “Portfolio Management”, preceding “Demand Planning” to leverage step two’s outcomes; there are improvement opportunities identified in “Pre-meeting” and “Executive Meeting” steps regarding capacity to simulate different scenarios from a financial perspective; and most of the studied companies do not adopt a S&OP software facing limitations to manage information and perform what-if analysis. Limitations of the investigation: Only companies located in Brazil are investigated. Practical implications: The study provides useful information for practitioners on the characterization of the S&OP process, implementation challenges, and improvement opportunities. Originality / Value: The paper applies different research methods (multiple-case study and survey) and two recognized frameworks from the literature in the study of the S&OP process performed by 15 companies, providing a broad characterization of the processes implemented and valuable findings about challenges and improvement opportunities. Although all the researched companies are Brazilian, evidences indicate the results are generalizable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
销售和运营计划:15家巴西公司的经验教训
目标:本文的目标是调查15家巴西公司,这些公司定期执行S&OP周期,以描述实施的过程,并讨论挑战和改进机会。设计/方法论/方法:最初,采用多案例研究方法,包括15家巴西公司。然后,在同一组织中进行调查,以深化调查。两个公认的S&OP框架从文献中被用来构建研究。结果:主要研究发现包括:部分企业认为“数据收集”是一项正常任务,不再是标准操作周期步骤;一些组织在“需求计划”之前包含了一个名为“项目组合管理”的新步骤,以利用步骤二的结果;在“会前”和“执行会议”步骤中确定了从财务角度模拟不同情景的能力方面的改进机会;而且大多数被研究的公司在管理信息和执行假设分析方面面临限制,没有采用标准普尔软件。调查的局限性:仅调查位于巴西的公司。实际意义:该研究为从业者提供了关于S&OP过程特征、实施挑战和改进机会的有用信息。原创性/价值:本文应用不同的研究方法(多案例研究和调查)和两个公认的框架,从15家公司实施的S&OP过程的研究中,提供了实施过程的广泛特征和关于挑战和改进机会的有价值的发现。虽然所有被研究的公司都是巴西公司,但证据表明,研究结果具有普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
27
审稿时长
44 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sustainability and Operational Excellence opportunities with Industry 4.0, Lean and Circular Economy Analysis of the application of recycled polypropylene Productivity in a pandemic Analysis of product-service system logistics strategies in e-commerce An ERP implementation on a beekeeping and honey value chain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1