Discontinuation of Postoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics for Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery.

Abstract

Background  Postoperative prophylactic antibiotic usage for endoscopic skull base surgery varies based on the institution as evidence-based guidelines are lacking. The purpose of this study is to determine whether discontinuing postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in endoscopic endonasal cases led to a difference in central nervous system (CNS) infections, multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO) infections, or other postoperative infections. Methods  This quality improvement study compared outcomes between a retrospective cohort (from September 2013 to March 2019) and a prospective cohort (April 2019 to June 2019) after adopting a protocol to discontinue prophylactic postoperative antibiotics in patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs). Our primary end points of the study included the presence of postoperative CNS infection, Clostridium difficile ( C. diff ), and MDRO infections. Results  A total of 388 patients were analyzed, 313 in the pre-protocol group and 75 in the post-protocol group. There were similar rates of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak (56.9 vs. 61.3%, p  = 0.946). There was a statistically significant decrease in the proportion of patients receiving IV antibiotics during their postoperative course ( p  = 0.001) and those discharged on antibiotics ( p  = 0.001). There was no significant increase in the rate of CNS infections in the post-protocol group despite the discontinuation of postoperative antibiotics (3.5 vs. 2.7%, p  = 0.714). There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative C. diff (0 vs. 0%, p  = 0.488) or development of MDRO infections (0.3 vs 0%, p  = 0.624). Conclusion  Discontinuation of postoperative antibiotics after EEA at our institution did not change the frequency of CNS infections. It appears that discontinuation of antibiotics after EEA is safe.