Achieving independence: a decision-making framework for doctors in training.

Q1 Arts and Humanities Spatium Pub Date : 2008-10-01 DOI:10.7861/clinmedicine.8-5-512
Philip Berry
{"title":"Achieving independence: a decision-making framework for doctors in training.","authors":"Philip Berry","doi":"10.7861/clinmedicine.8-5-512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Postgraduate medical training presents many instances in which a junior doctor must decide whether it is appropriate to proceed without the advice, supervision or practical assistance of a senior. These decisions, vital to the development of any doctor, are commonly made in the context of providing medical treatment to acutely unwell patients or undertaking practical procedures. The major factors requiring reflection before making the decision to proceed or request help may be separated into patient-centred and physician-centred categories: the patient's right to choose who treats them, the patient's safety, the physician's assessment of their own competence and the physician's personal comfort. The relevance of each of these factors is explored in the context of two scenarios. In this way a simple framework to assist junior doctors in considering the risks and benefits of their intended actions is presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":38713,"journal":{"name":"Spatium","volume":"1 1","pages":"512-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4953934/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spatium","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.8-5-512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Postgraduate medical training presents many instances in which a junior doctor must decide whether it is appropriate to proceed without the advice, supervision or practical assistance of a senior. These decisions, vital to the development of any doctor, are commonly made in the context of providing medical treatment to acutely unwell patients or undertaking practical procedures. The major factors requiring reflection before making the decision to proceed or request help may be separated into patient-centred and physician-centred categories: the patient's right to choose who treats them, the patient's safety, the physician's assessment of their own competence and the physician's personal comfort. The relevance of each of these factors is explored in the context of two scenarios. In this way a simple framework to assist junior doctors in considering the risks and benefits of their intended actions is presented.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实现独立:受训医生的决策框架。
在研究生医学培训中,有许多情况下,初级医生必须决定在没有高级医生的建议、监督或实际帮助的情况下是否应该继续工作。这些决定对任何医生的发展都至关重要,通常是在为急性病人提供治疗或进行实际操作时做出的。在做出继续治疗或请求帮助的决定之前,需要考虑的主要因素可分为以病人为中心和以医生为中心两类:病人选择由谁治疗的权利、病人的安全、医生对自身能力的评估以及医生的个人舒适度。我们将通过两个场景来探讨这些因素的相关性。通过这种方式,提出了一个简单的框架,以帮助初级医生考虑其预期行动的风险和益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spatium
Spatium Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
The first community housing model constructed in Hungary - the collective house in Miskolc Credibility of legalization: Illegally constructed buildings in Serbia Rethinking soviet era mass housing in Kazakhstan Are we discriminating towards guests with disabilities? Accessibility analyses of public restaurants facilities in the Republic of Slovenia The impact of energy improvement measures in single-family residential buildings on air pollution in the city of Uzice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1