VALIDATION OF THE CLINICIAN ATTITUDES TOWARD BIOSTATISTICS AMONG BRAZILIAN DENTISTRY GRADUATE STUDENTS

F. Bonafé, Mariana Andrade Costa, J. Campos
{"title":"VALIDATION OF THE CLINICIAN ATTITUDES TOWARD BIOSTATISTICS AMONG BRAZILIAN DENTISTRY GRADUATE STUDENTS","authors":"F. Bonafé, Mariana Andrade Costa, J. Campos","doi":"10.28951/RBB.V36I3.244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe aim of this study was to validity of the Portuguese version of the Clinician Attitudes Toward Biostatistics (CATB) among dentistry postgraduate students. The CATB is a psychometric instrument  four-factor. We evaluated the validity (λ, X2/df, CFI, TLI e RMSEA) and reliability (Cronbach's alpha (α) and Composite Reliability (CR)) of the instrument to the sample. It took part of the study 115 postgraduate students (62 master’s students, 80 women, average age 26 ± 4 years). The four-factor model did not fit the sample (λ=0.00-0.85, X2/df=1.83, CFI=0.85 e TLI=0.82 e RMSEA=0.09). After the fit of the refined orthogonal two-factor model (“Perceptions of Knowledge/Training” and “Perceptions of Biostatistics in Research and Scientific Evidence”) was found to be adequate (λ>0.45, X2/df≤2.00; CFI e TLI>0.90, RMSEA≤0.10, α e CR>0.70). The “Perception of Knowledge/Training of Biostatistics” factor was not found to be correlated with the “Perception of Biostatistics in Research and Scientific Evidence”. \n","PeriodicalId":36293,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Biometria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Biometria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28951/RBB.V36I3.244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The aim of this study was to validity of the Portuguese version of the Clinician Attitudes Toward Biostatistics (CATB) among dentistry postgraduate students. The CATB is a psychometric instrument  four-factor. We evaluated the validity (λ, X2/df, CFI, TLI e RMSEA) and reliability (Cronbach's alpha (α) and Composite Reliability (CR)) of the instrument to the sample. It took part of the study 115 postgraduate students (62 master’s students, 80 women, average age 26 ± 4 years). The four-factor model did not fit the sample (λ=0.00-0.85, X2/df=1.83, CFI=0.85 e TLI=0.82 e RMSEA=0.09). After the fit of the refined orthogonal two-factor model (“Perceptions of Knowledge/Training” and “Perceptions of Biostatistics in Research and Scientific Evidence”) was found to be adequate (λ>0.45, X2/df≤2.00; CFI e TLI>0.90, RMSEA≤0.10, α e CR>0.70). The “Perception of Knowledge/Training of Biostatistics” factor was not found to be correlated with the “Perception of Biostatistics in Research and Scientific Evidence”.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西牙科研究生临床医师对生物统计学态度的验证
本研究的目的是为了验证葡萄牙语版本的临床医师对生物统计学的态度(CATB)在牙科研究生中的有效性。CATB是一种四因素心理测量仪。我们评估了仪器对样本的效度(λ, X2/df, CFI, TLI和RMSEA)和信度(Cronbach's alpha (α)和复合信度(CR))。研究对象为115名研究生(硕士研究生62名,女性80名,平均年龄26±4岁)。四因素模型不适合样本(λ=0.00-0.85, X2/df=1.83, CFI=0.85, TLI=0.82, RMSEA=0.09)。经过改进的正交双因素模型(“知识/培训感知”和“研究和科学证据中的生物统计学感知”)的拟合发现是适当的(λ>0.45, X2/df≤2.00;CFI e TLI>0.90, RMSEA≤0.10,α e CR>0.70)。“生物统计学知识认知/训练”因子与“研究与科学证据中的生物统计学认知”因子无相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Biometria
Revista Brasileira de Biometria Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
CLUSTER ANALYSIS IDENTIFIES VARIABLES RELATED TO PROGNOSIS OF BREAST CANCER DISEASE UROCHLOA GRASS GROWTH AS A FUNCTION OF NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZATION BEST LINEAR UNBIASED LATENT VALUES PREDICTORS FOR FINITE POPULATION LINEAR MODELS WITH DIFFERENT ERROR SOURCES ANALYSIS OF COVID-19 CONTAMINATION AND DEATHS CASES IN BRAZIL ACCORDING TO THE NEWCOMB-BENFORD INCIDENCE AND LETHALITY OF COVID-19 CLUSTERS IN BRAZIL VIA CIRCULAR SCAN METHOD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1