Teaching Labour Unionism in Schools

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Critical Education Pub Date : 2020-03-17 DOI:10.14288/CE.V11I6.186477
Sam Oldham
{"title":"Teaching Labour Unionism in Schools","authors":"Sam Oldham","doi":"10.14288/CE.V11I6.186477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite efforts, education has failed to provide solutions to wicked economic problems. In particular, efforts to mitigate the global crisis in wealth and income inequality through education have been amiss. This paper offers a critical policy analysis of prospects for the teaching of labour unionism in schools as a crucial step towards genuine economic and social justice. Drawing on existing research, policy texts, media sources and public data, it broadly analyses existing paradigms for policy in the relationship between education systems and economic affairs, including aspects of human capital theory, new growth theories, the promises of the global ‘knowledge economy’, and fields of entrepreneurship and enterprise education. Rather than serving to mitigate wicked economic problems, the paper argues that these policy paradigms serve to promote confusion around the relationship between education and economic growth, or to perpetuate inequality. In contrast to the lack of evidence supporting these paradigms, evidence for a positive correlation between labour union membership and greater equality in wealth and incomes is conclusive. The paper surveys a range of existing programs for teaching about labour unionism in schools, advocating for their proliferation. Rather than focused on a single context, transnational patterns and commonalities are addressed.","PeriodicalId":10808,"journal":{"name":"Critical Education","volume":"55 9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14288/CE.V11I6.186477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite efforts, education has failed to provide solutions to wicked economic problems. In particular, efforts to mitigate the global crisis in wealth and income inequality through education have been amiss. This paper offers a critical policy analysis of prospects for the teaching of labour unionism in schools as a crucial step towards genuine economic and social justice. Drawing on existing research, policy texts, media sources and public data, it broadly analyses existing paradigms for policy in the relationship between education systems and economic affairs, including aspects of human capital theory, new growth theories, the promises of the global ‘knowledge economy’, and fields of entrepreneurship and enterprise education. Rather than serving to mitigate wicked economic problems, the paper argues that these policy paradigms serve to promote confusion around the relationship between education and economic growth, or to perpetuate inequality. In contrast to the lack of evidence supporting these paradigms, evidence for a positive correlation between labour union membership and greater equality in wealth and incomes is conclusive. The paper surveys a range of existing programs for teaching about labour unionism in schools, advocating for their proliferation. Rather than focused on a single context, transnational patterns and commonalities are addressed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在学校教授工会主义
尽管做出了努力,但教育未能为恶劣的经济问题提供解决方案。特别是,通过教育缓解全球财富和收入不平等危机的努力是错误的。本文对工会主义在学校教学的前景进行了批判性的政策分析,认为这是迈向真正的经济和社会正义的关键一步。利用现有的研究、政策文本、媒体来源和公共数据,它广泛地分析了教育系统与经济事务之间关系的现有政策范式,包括人力资本理论、新增长理论、全球“知识经济”的承诺以及创业和企业教育领域。这篇论文认为,这些政策范式非但没有缓解恶劣的经济问题,反而助长了人们对教育与经济增长之间关系的混淆,或者使不平等永久化。与缺乏证据支持这些范式相反,工会成员资格与财富和收入更大程度的平等之间存在正相关的证据是确凿的。这篇论文调查了一系列现有的关于工会主义的学校教学项目,并提倡推广这些项目。它不是集中于单一背景,而是处理跨国模式和共性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Education
Critical Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
30.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Critique of the Critical Critique of Critical Pedagogy: Freire, Suchodolski and the Materialist Pedagogy of Emancipation How to Get a Life: Humanities Education in the age of Neoliberal Exhaustion Teaching as Intellectual Solidarity Academic Ableism and Students with Intellectual/Development Disabilities: “Disabled or Not, People Just Want to Feel Welcome”: Stories of Belonging from College Students with Intellectual Disability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1