On the Distinction between Consideration and Utility

Keyvan Dehmamy, Thomas Otter
{"title":"On the Distinction between Consideration and Utility","authors":"Keyvan Dehmamy, Thomas Otter","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2433145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Models of consumer decision making often condition on attention to the different offers or alternatives to choose from. However, in many environments offers not only compete through their utility but also for the attention of decision makers. In this case, it is important to distinguish between attention and utility - it makes a difference whether an offering is overlooked, or rejected conditional on awareness - for optimal marketing control and empirical measures of competition. We show how discrete-continuous choices, in contrast to multinomial choices, facilitate the empirical distinction between attention and utility, and more generally the identification of two-stage decision models. In our illustrative application we analyze choices from simulated store shelves. We find that the number of facings of a brand on the shelf influence attention to, but not utility from the brand. We then formulate a parametric model that identifies attention based considerations sets and document clearly misleading inferences from a model that ignores attention and motivates choices from utility only.","PeriodicalId":10477,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Social Science eJournal","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Social Science eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2433145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Models of consumer decision making often condition on attention to the different offers or alternatives to choose from. However, in many environments offers not only compete through their utility but also for the attention of decision makers. In this case, it is important to distinguish between attention and utility - it makes a difference whether an offering is overlooked, or rejected conditional on awareness - for optimal marketing control and empirical measures of competition. We show how discrete-continuous choices, in contrast to multinomial choices, facilitate the empirical distinction between attention and utility, and more generally the identification of two-stage decision models. In our illustrative application we analyze choices from simulated store shelves. We find that the number of facings of a brand on the shelf influence attention to, but not utility from the brand. We then formulate a parametric model that identifies attention based considerations sets and document clearly misleading inferences from a model that ignores attention and motivates choices from utility only.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论对价与效用的区别
消费者决策模型通常以关注不同的产品或可供选择的备选方案为条件。然而,在许多环境中,产品不仅通过其效用来竞争,而且还吸引决策者的注意。在这种情况下,重要的是要区分注意力和效用- -它对提供的产品是否被忽视或以意识为条件而被拒绝有区别- -以实现最佳的营销控制和竞争的经验措施。我们展示了与多项选择相比,离散连续选择如何促进注意力和效用之间的经验区分,以及更普遍的两阶段决策模型的识别。在我们的说明性应用程序中,我们分析来自模拟商店货架的选择。我们发现货架上一个品牌的饰面数量影响关注度,但不影响品牌的效用。然后,我们制定了一个参数模型,该模型识别基于注意力的考虑集,并清楚地记录了一个忽略注意力和仅从效用中激励选择的模型的误导性推论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Cost of Overconfidence in Public Information The Compliance Consequences of Fault Assignment in Sanctions Examining the Link Between Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Work Performance of Employees in the Private Schools, Mediated by Workplace Environment An Ordinal Theory of Risk and Correlation Aversion Persuasion Under Costly Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1