Community music as intervention: Three doctoral researchers consider intervention from their different contexts

IF 0.9 4区 艺术学 0 MUSIC International Journal of Community Music Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.1386/ijcm_00019_1
Ruth Currie, J. Gibson, C. Y. Lam
{"title":"Community music as intervention: Three doctoral researchers consider intervention from their different contexts","authors":"Ruth Currie, J. Gibson, C. Y. Lam","doi":"10.1386/ijcm_00019_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a rising critique of the process and position of decision-making across music interventions, which has been evidenced through the MUSOC research network debates that we, as doctoral students, have participated in. In this article, we specifically discuss ‘intervention’ as ‘deliberate strategies that seek to enable people to find self-expression through musical means’ (Bartleet and Higgins 2018: 3). We offer three perspectives from three different intervention contexts: community music in schools, organizational settings and music-making workshops. Through this article, we share and reflect on our experience with intervention and decision making within our practice. We give specific focus to: how intentions and motivations underpinning interventionist practice manifest in different contexts; how this is currently informed by the decision-making structures through which community music is practised in each context; and, the extent to which dominant modes of practice have potential to disempower participants, including how they are reinforced and re-enacted through this process. Finally, we suggest that how we talk about intervention across peers, and how we enact it through our practice as practitioners and researchers is possibly misaligned. This warrants further consideration if explorations of the term ‘intervention’ are to feed into discussion and action for responsible practice.","PeriodicalId":43980,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Community Music","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Community Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/ijcm_00019_1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

There is a rising critique of the process and position of decision-making across music interventions, which has been evidenced through the MUSOC research network debates that we, as doctoral students, have participated in. In this article, we specifically discuss ‘intervention’ as ‘deliberate strategies that seek to enable people to find self-expression through musical means’ (Bartleet and Higgins 2018: 3). We offer three perspectives from three different intervention contexts: community music in schools, organizational settings and music-making workshops. Through this article, we share and reflect on our experience with intervention and decision making within our practice. We give specific focus to: how intentions and motivations underpinning interventionist practice manifest in different contexts; how this is currently informed by the decision-making structures through which community music is practised in each context; and, the extent to which dominant modes of practice have potential to disempower participants, including how they are reinforced and re-enacted through this process. Finally, we suggest that how we talk about intervention across peers, and how we enact it through our practice as practitioners and researchers is possibly misaligned. This warrants further consideration if explorations of the term ‘intervention’ are to feed into discussion and action for responsible practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区音乐作为干预:三位博士研究人员从他们不同的背景考虑干预
对音乐干预决策的过程和立场的批评越来越多,这已经通过我们作为博士生参与的MUSOC研究网络辩论得到了证明。在本文中,我们将“干预”具体讨论为“旨在使人们通过音乐手段找到自我表达的刻意策略”(bartlett和Higgins 2018: 3)。我们从三种不同的干预环境中提供了三个视角:学校社区音乐、组织环境和音乐制作工作坊。通过本文,我们在实践中分享和反思我们在干预和决策方面的经验。我们特别关注:支持干预主义实践的意图和动机如何在不同背景下表现出来;社区音乐在各种情况下的实践是如何通过决策结构来实现的?在多大程度上,主导的实践模式有可能剥夺参与者的权力,包括它们如何通过这一过程得到加强和重新制定。最后,我们认为,我们如何谈论同伴之间的干预,以及我们如何通过我们作为从业者和研究人员的实践来实施干预,可能是不一致的。如果要将“干预”一词的探索纳入负责任实践的讨论和行动,这就需要进一步考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
42.90%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Community Music publishes research articles, practical discussions, timely reviews, readers'' notes and special issues concerning all aspects of community music. The editorial board is composed of leading international scholars and practitioners spanning diverse disciplines that reflect the scope of community music practice and theory. This journal is double-blind peer-reviewed in order to maintain the highest standards of scholastic integrity.
期刊最新文献
The story of a busker, and his dad Buskers as agents of change in Hong Kong Ask forgiveness, not permission: Busking, community and contempt Busking in the neo-liberal city: A critical inventory of a selection of street art ordinances in Austria ‘If you play some good music, people immediately understand it’: Audience response to busking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1