Specific injury scenarios due to ‘victims’ own negligence’ among Federal Fire Service officers and workers of the EMERCOM of Russia

A. A. Kondashov, E. V. Bobrinev, E. Udavtsova
{"title":"Specific injury scenarios due to ‘victims’ own negligence’ among Federal Fire Service officers and workers of the EMERCOM of Russia","authors":"A. A. Kondashov, E. V. Bobrinev, E. Udavtsova","doi":"10.25016/2541-7487-2023-0-2-89-98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance. Victims’ own negligence is a main cause of injuries among the EMERCOM of Russia officers.The objective is to analyze occupational injury scenarios caused by ‘victims’ own negligence’ among the Federal Fire Service (FFS) officers and workers of the EMERCOM of Russia within 2010 to 2021 timespan.Methods. The study examined 10,000 fire service officers to analyze the incidence of occupational injuries due to ‘victims’ own negligence within 2010 to 2021, depending on the injury-associated activity, patient’s position, age, type of injury, weekday and month of injury. We calculated arithmetic average values and errors (M ± m). By knowing the number of injuries and the number of fire service officers at risk, we calculated the risks of injury for specific occupational scenarios.Results and discussion. The FFS officers of the EMERCOM of Russia are subject to the average annual risk of injury due to victims’ own negligence of (4.49 ± 0.62) ∙ 10–4 injuries / (person ∙ year). The risk of injuries commissioned officers (5.54 ± 0.87) ∙ 10–4 injuries/(person ∙ year) exceeds that among non-commissioned workers (3,14 ± 0,29) ∙ 10–4 (injuries/person ∙ year). Over 12 years, the incidence of injuries saw a 2.7-fold decrease among commissioned officers and a 1.4-fold decrease among non-commissioned workers. The share of injuries due to ‘victims’ own negligence’ stood at 36 % of the total number of occupational injuries among fire service officers.Conclusion. The analysis of injury scenarios due to ‘victims’ own negligence’ among the FFS officers of the EMERCOM of Russia is a contribution to enhance prevention of occupational injuries among firefighters and reduce the death rate in occupational settings.","PeriodicalId":36526,"journal":{"name":"Medico-Biological and Socio-Psychological Issues of Safety in Emergency Situations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medico-Biological and Socio-Psychological Issues of Safety in Emergency Situations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25016/2541-7487-2023-0-2-89-98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relevance. Victims’ own negligence is a main cause of injuries among the EMERCOM of Russia officers.The objective is to analyze occupational injury scenarios caused by ‘victims’ own negligence’ among the Federal Fire Service (FFS) officers and workers of the EMERCOM of Russia within 2010 to 2021 timespan.Methods. The study examined 10,000 fire service officers to analyze the incidence of occupational injuries due to ‘victims’ own negligence within 2010 to 2021, depending on the injury-associated activity, patient’s position, age, type of injury, weekday and month of injury. We calculated arithmetic average values and errors (M ± m). By knowing the number of injuries and the number of fire service officers at risk, we calculated the risks of injury for specific occupational scenarios.Results and discussion. The FFS officers of the EMERCOM of Russia are subject to the average annual risk of injury due to victims’ own negligence of (4.49 ± 0.62) ∙ 10–4 injuries / (person ∙ year). The risk of injuries commissioned officers (5.54 ± 0.87) ∙ 10–4 injuries/(person ∙ year) exceeds that among non-commissioned workers (3,14 ± 0,29) ∙ 10–4 (injuries/person ∙ year). Over 12 years, the incidence of injuries saw a 2.7-fold decrease among commissioned officers and a 1.4-fold decrease among non-commissioned workers. The share of injuries due to ‘victims’ own negligence’ stood at 36 % of the total number of occupational injuries among fire service officers.Conclusion. The analysis of injury scenarios due to ‘victims’ own negligence’ among the FFS officers of the EMERCOM of Russia is a contribution to enhance prevention of occupational injuries among firefighters and reduce the death rate in occupational settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在俄罗斯联邦消防局官员和EMERCOM工作人员中,由于“受害者自身疏忽”造成的具体伤害情景
的相关性。受害者自身的疏忽是俄罗斯军官受伤的主要原因。目的是分析2010年至2021年期间俄罗斯联邦消防局(FFS)官员和EMERCOM工作人员因“受害者自身疏忽”造成的职业伤害情景。该研究调查了1万名消防人员,分析了2010年至2021年间因“受害者”自身疏忽造成的职业伤害的发生率,具体取决于与伤害相关的活动、病人的位置、年龄、伤害类型、工作日和受伤月份。我们计算了算术平均值和误差(M±M),通过了解受伤人数和处于危险中的消防人员人数,我们计算了特定职业情景下的受伤风险。结果和讨论。俄罗斯EMERCOM的FFS官员每年因受害者自身疏忽造成的伤害风险平均为(4.49±0.62)∙10-4次/(人∙年)。服役军官的受伤风险(5.54±0.87)∙10-4次/(人∙年)超过未服役工人的(3,14±0,29)∙10-4次(人∙年)。在过去的12年里,士官的受伤率下降了2.7倍,士官的受伤率下降了1.4倍。由于“受害者自身疏忽”造成的伤害占消防人员职业伤害总数的36%。对俄罗斯紧急灾害管理委员会FFS官员因"受害者自身疏忽"造成的伤害情况进行分析,有助于加强对消防员职业伤害的预防,并降低职业环境中的死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Index of articles of journal “Medico-Biological and Socio-Psychological Problems of Safety in Emergency Situations” 2022 Aspects of eliminating medical and sanitary consequences of the flood disaster in the Republic of Crimea on June 17–18, 2021 А case of mass vaccination against a new coronavirus infection (COVID-19) at a large construction site Extensive traumatic detachment of soft tissue after accident: clinical experience of a multidisciplinary hospital Publicly available online course as a promising tool for teaching and promoting first aid skills in cardiac arrest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1