Quality assurance for non-contrast CT of the abdomen and pelvis during a period of supply chain disruption leading to iodinated contrast shortage in the emergency department setting.

IF 1.1 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Clinical Imaging Science Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.25259/JCIS_142_2022
Luis Fernando Calimano-Ramirez, Mauricio Hernandez, Anmol Singh, Kazim Ziya Gumus, Wanda Marfori, Mayur K Virarkar, Chandana Lall, Dheeraj Reddy Gopireddy
{"title":"Quality assurance for non-contrast CT of the abdomen and pelvis during a period of supply chain disruption leading to iodinated contrast shortage in the emergency department setting.","authors":"Luis Fernando Calimano-Ramirez,&nbsp;Mauricio Hernandez,&nbsp;Anmol Singh,&nbsp;Kazim Ziya Gumus,&nbsp;Wanda Marfori,&nbsp;Mayur K Virarkar,&nbsp;Chandana Lall,&nbsp;Dheeraj Reddy Gopireddy","doi":"10.25259/JCIS_142_2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Iodinated contrast media (ICM) shortage crisis due to COVID-19 lockdowns led to a need for alternate imaging protocols consisting of non-contrast computed tomography (CT) for abdominal complaints and related trauma indications in emergency department (ED) settings. This quality assurance study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes of protocol modifications during ICM shortage and identify potential imaging misdiagnosis of acute abdominal complaints and related trauma.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study included 424 ED patients with abdominal pain, falls, or motor vehicle collision (MVC)-related trauma who had non-contrast CT of the abdomen and pelvis in May 2022. We accessed the initial complaint, order indication, non-contrast CT results, any acute or incidental findings, and any follow-up imaging of the same body region with their results. We evaluated their association utilizing Chi-squared tests. We assessed sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive values using follow-up scan confirmation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across initial complaint categories, 72.9% of cases were abdominal pain, and 37.3% received positive findings. Only 22.6% of patients had follow-up imaging. Most confirmed original reports were for abdominal pain. We also found three reports of missed findings. There were significant associations between complaint categories and initial non-contrast CT report results (<i>P</i> < 0.001), as well as initial complaint categories and whether the patient received follow-up imaging or not <i>(P</i> < 0.004). No significant associations were found between follow-up imaging results and initial report confirmation. Non-contrast CT had 94% sensitivity and 100% specificity, with positive and negative predictive values 100% and 94%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rate of missed acute diagnoses using non-contrast CT for patients presenting to the ED with acute abdominal complaints or related trauma has been low during the recent shortage, but further investigation would be needed to verify and quantify the implications of not routinely giving oral or intravenous contrast in the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":15512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Imaging Science","volume":"13 ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7d/98/JCIS-13-8.PMC9990841.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Imaging Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_142_2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: Iodinated contrast media (ICM) shortage crisis due to COVID-19 lockdowns led to a need for alternate imaging protocols consisting of non-contrast computed tomography (CT) for abdominal complaints and related trauma indications in emergency department (ED) settings. This quality assurance study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes of protocol modifications during ICM shortage and identify potential imaging misdiagnosis of acute abdominal complaints and related trauma.

Material and methods: The study included 424 ED patients with abdominal pain, falls, or motor vehicle collision (MVC)-related trauma who had non-contrast CT of the abdomen and pelvis in May 2022. We accessed the initial complaint, order indication, non-contrast CT results, any acute or incidental findings, and any follow-up imaging of the same body region with their results. We evaluated their association utilizing Chi-squared tests. We assessed sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive values using follow-up scan confirmation.

Results: Across initial complaint categories, 72.9% of cases were abdominal pain, and 37.3% received positive findings. Only 22.6% of patients had follow-up imaging. Most confirmed original reports were for abdominal pain. We also found three reports of missed findings. There were significant associations between complaint categories and initial non-contrast CT report results (P < 0.001), as well as initial complaint categories and whether the patient received follow-up imaging or not (P < 0.004). No significant associations were found between follow-up imaging results and initial report confirmation. Non-contrast CT had 94% sensitivity and 100% specificity, with positive and negative predictive values 100% and 94%, respectively.

Conclusion: Rate of missed acute diagnoses using non-contrast CT for patients presenting to the ED with acute abdominal complaints or related trauma has been low during the recent shortage, but further investigation would be needed to verify and quantify the implications of not routinely giving oral or intravenous contrast in the ED.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊部门供应链中断导致碘造影剂短缺期间腹部和骨盆非造影剂CT的质量保证
目的:由于COVID-19封锁导致碘造影剂(ICM)短缺危机,导致急诊科(ED)需要替代成像方案,包括针对腹部疾病和相关创伤指征的非对比计算机断层扫描(CT)。本质量保证研究旨在评估ICM短缺期间方案修改的临床结果,并确定急性腹部疾患和相关创伤的潜在影像学误诊。材料和方法:研究纳入了424例腹部疼痛、跌倒或机动车碰撞(MVC)相关创伤的ED患者,这些患者于2022年5月进行了腹部和骨盆的非对比CT检查。我们查阅了患者的初始症状、顺序指征、非对比CT结果、任何急性或偶然发现,以及任何随访的同一身体区域的影像学结果。我们利用卡方检验评估了它们的相关性。我们通过随访扫描确认评估敏感性、特异性和阳性/阴性预测值。结果:在最初的主诉类别中,72.9%的病例为腹痛,37.3%的病例为阳性结果。只有22.6%的患者进行了随访影像学检查。大多数确诊的原始报告都是腹痛。我们还发现了三例漏诊报告。主诉类别与初始CT非对比报告结果有显著相关性(P < 0.001),初始主诉类别与患者是否接受随访影像学检查有显著相关性(P < 0.004)。随访影像结果与初次报告证实之间没有发现显著关联。非对比CT敏感性为94%,特异性为100%,阳性预测值为100%,阴性预测值为94%。结论:在最近的短缺期间,在急诊科就诊的急性腹部疾病或相关创伤患者中,使用非对比CT的急性诊断率很低,但需要进一步的调查来验证和量化急诊科不常规给予口服或静脉对比的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Imaging Science (JCIS) is an open access peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing high-quality articles in the field of Imaging Science. The journal aims to present Imaging Science and relevant clinical information in an understandable and useful format. The journal is owned and published by the Scientific Scholar. Audience Our audience includes Radiologists, Researchers, Clinicians, medical professionals and students. Review process JCIS has a highly rigorous peer-review process that makes sure that manuscripts are scientifically accurate, relevant, novel and important. Authors disclose all conflicts, affiliations and financial associations such that the published content is not biased.
期刊最新文献
Three main portal veins: A very rare case of portal vein anomaly. Granulomatous prostatitis following Bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy. Granulomatous mastitis following stereotactic core-needle biopsy: A case report. Multimodal imaging findings of tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma: A case report. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings of intracranial and extracranial meningioma with perineural spread through the foramen rotundum: A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1