Translating research into health practice: a case study of integrated palliative care system in Catalonia, Spain

IF 0.8 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Integrated Care Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.1108/jica-06-2021-0032
Meritxell Mondejar-Pont, X. Gómez-Batiste, Anna Ramon-Aribau
{"title":"Translating research into health practice: a case study of integrated palliative care system in Catalonia, Spain","authors":"Meritxell Mondejar-Pont, X. Gómez-Batiste, Anna Ramon-Aribau","doi":"10.1108/jica-06-2021-0032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeResearch findings provide the professional community with knowledge that enables to better understand healthcare interventions. Many authors point out that whilst these findings are valued, the findings are not always translated into healthcare practise. The purpose of the paper is to assess the applicability of the essential elements of an integrated palliative care system (IPCS) found in research into the practise of Osona Palliative Care System (OPCS).Design/methodology/approachThe study used a qualitative methodology with a case study design. In total, 24 health professionals were interviewed in Osona for the research, and the results were analysed using deductive content analysis.FindingsThe study concludes that research findings can better be translated into specific contexts by incorporating the needs and characteristics of the system. The process could be a strategy for bridging the research–practise gap.Originality/valueCombining the findings from the study and the findings found in the literature reviewed led to the creation of the IPCS-elements-blended model of research and practise. Such a kind of mixed model could be used in other studies seeking to overcome the research and practice gap.","PeriodicalId":51837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrated Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jica-06-2021-0032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeResearch findings provide the professional community with knowledge that enables to better understand healthcare interventions. Many authors point out that whilst these findings are valued, the findings are not always translated into healthcare practise. The purpose of the paper is to assess the applicability of the essential elements of an integrated palliative care system (IPCS) found in research into the practise of Osona Palliative Care System (OPCS).Design/methodology/approachThe study used a qualitative methodology with a case study design. In total, 24 health professionals were interviewed in Osona for the research, and the results were analysed using deductive content analysis.FindingsThe study concludes that research findings can better be translated into specific contexts by incorporating the needs and characteristics of the system. The process could be a strategy for bridging the research–practise gap.Originality/valueCombining the findings from the study and the findings found in the literature reviewed led to the creation of the IPCS-elements-blended model of research and practise. Such a kind of mixed model could be used in other studies seeking to overcome the research and practice gap.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将研究转化为卫生实践:西班牙加泰罗尼亚综合姑息治疗系统的案例研究
研究结果为专业社区提供了知识,使他们能够更好地了解医疗保健干预措施。许多作者指出,虽然这些发现是有价值的,但这些发现并不总是转化为医疗实践。本文的目的是评估在研究中发现的综合姑息治疗系统(IPCS)的基本要素的适用性到奥索纳姑息治疗系统(OPCS)的实践。设计/方法/方法该研究采用了案例研究设计的定性方法。为了这项研究,在奥索纳总共采访了24名卫生专业人员,并使用演绎内容分析对结果进行了分析。该研究的结论是,通过结合系统的需求和特点,可以更好地将研究结果转化为具体的背景。这一过程可能是一种弥合研究与实践差距的策略。独创性/价值将研究结果与文献综述中的发现结合起来,创造了ipcs -要素-混合研究与实践模型。这种混合模型可以在其他研究中使用,以克服研究和实践的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Integrated Care
Journal of Integrated Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Integrated care’s missing piece: the US experience Concept analysis of patient journey disruptions: the obstacle of integrated care Community-engaged co-design of a quality improvement capacity building program within an integrated health system in Ontario, Canada Commissioning for integration: exploring the dynamics of the “subsidy tables” approach in Dutch social care delivery Reimagining chronic pain management: the case for integrated care in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1