A Sharp Decrease in the Number of Dalmatian Pelican Pelecanus crispus (Aves: Pelecaniformes) in the Urals and Western Siberia in 2021

Vladimir V. Tarasov
{"title":"A Sharp Decrease in the Number of Dalmatian Pelican Pelecanus crispus (Aves: Pelecaniformes) in the Urals and Western Siberia in 2021","authors":"Vladimir V. Tarasov","doi":"10.17223/19988591/59/6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Dalmatian pelican Pelecanus crispus (Bruch, 1832) is a globally rare species. Its extremely local (\"point\") placement during the nesting period on a few hard-to-reach water bodies distanced far from one another makes it a highly vulnerable species. In the end of the 20th century, the number of the species in Chelyabinsk, Kurgan and Tyumen oblasts steadily grew. This was largely due to the redistribution of individuals from drying reservoirs of the more southern parts of the breeding range to the northern ones against the background of global climate warming. Thus, pelicans stopped nesting in the Svetlinsky Reserve (Orenburg oblast) due to the drought. In the spring and summer of 2021, the first mass deaths of these birds occurred in the history of study in the Urals and Western Siberia. During the observations of seven colonies in Chelyabinsk, Kurgan and Tyumen oblasts using the DJI Mavic-2 Zoom drone, we found that many individuals did not return to the breeding grounds in the spring after wintering, and another part died at the height of the breeding season. As a result, the number of pelicans decreased by 70-80% in some colonies; in others, the proportion of dead birds was less, and some separate colonies were almost not affected at all. At the same time, in the western part of the study area (Chelyabinsk oblast), a significant part of the individuals died outside the breeding grounds, whereas in the eastern part, the birds died mainly in the breeding grounds and at a later time. In Kurgan oblast, the death of birds was noted in May, in Tyumen oblast it was in June. The total number of pelicans in the study area decreased from 1.2-1.4 thousand pairs to about 600 pairs (see the table). Six colonies were preserved; most of them now number 30-50 breeding pairs at best. However, in the study area, the largest colony (and the easternmost in the Okunevo Reserve (Tyumen oblast)) survived almost completely with about 400 pairs of pelicans continuing to breed. No more than 30 individuals died there, and this happened later than in other colonies, in July 2021. The main version of the cause of birds’ mass death is the epizootic of avian influenza which was tested in all samples (n = 5) taken from a colony in Tyumen oblast. Pelicans live in dense flocks all year round, and this could really contribute to the rapid spread of the infection. The facts of the birds’ death in various nesting sites located on a large territory, at a great distance from one another, make it seem that they contracted the virus in wintering areas. However, a number of questions remain unanswered. In particular, it is unclear how the infected birds were able to travel thousands of kilometers to their breeding grounds, why individuals of only one particular species died, why only adults died, and why they died at different times. Maybe, the avian influenza virus tested in the birds’ bodies was low-pathogenic and was not the cause of their death, but it was due to some other factor, such as food poisoning. It might be that the immunity of the birds was weakened by the abnormal heat that came to the study area since mid-May 2021. If the birds died from a highly pathogenic virus, it is unclear why this did not happen immediately after infection (in the wintering areas), but in a long time, at least from May to July. Moreover, the infection with the virus did not prevent the birds from arriving at breeding sites, building nests, laying eggs and starting to incubate. However, influenza viruses are very diverse and continue to evolve rapidly changing their properties and increasing resistance to the environment. Our understanding of the ecological factors favoring emergence and sustainability of these viruses is still limited. More efforts should certainly be made to save such a globally rare species as the Dalmatian pelican. At the moment, a large breeding colony on the territory of Western Siberia (on Tundrovo Lake in the Okunevo Reserve (Tyumen oblast)) remains the main breeding ground of the species in this area. Therefore, the importance of preserving this breeding colony comes to the fore. The article contains 1 Table, 42 References. The Author declares no conflict of interest.","PeriodicalId":37153,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Biologiya","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Biologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/19988591/59/6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Dalmatian pelican Pelecanus crispus (Bruch, 1832) is a globally rare species. Its extremely local ("point") placement during the nesting period on a few hard-to-reach water bodies distanced far from one another makes it a highly vulnerable species. In the end of the 20th century, the number of the species in Chelyabinsk, Kurgan and Tyumen oblasts steadily grew. This was largely due to the redistribution of individuals from drying reservoirs of the more southern parts of the breeding range to the northern ones against the background of global climate warming. Thus, pelicans stopped nesting in the Svetlinsky Reserve (Orenburg oblast) due to the drought. In the spring and summer of 2021, the first mass deaths of these birds occurred in the history of study in the Urals and Western Siberia. During the observations of seven colonies in Chelyabinsk, Kurgan and Tyumen oblasts using the DJI Mavic-2 Zoom drone, we found that many individuals did not return to the breeding grounds in the spring after wintering, and another part died at the height of the breeding season. As a result, the number of pelicans decreased by 70-80% in some colonies; in others, the proportion of dead birds was less, and some separate colonies were almost not affected at all. At the same time, in the western part of the study area (Chelyabinsk oblast), a significant part of the individuals died outside the breeding grounds, whereas in the eastern part, the birds died mainly in the breeding grounds and at a later time. In Kurgan oblast, the death of birds was noted in May, in Tyumen oblast it was in June. The total number of pelicans in the study area decreased from 1.2-1.4 thousand pairs to about 600 pairs (see the table). Six colonies were preserved; most of them now number 30-50 breeding pairs at best. However, in the study area, the largest colony (and the easternmost in the Okunevo Reserve (Tyumen oblast)) survived almost completely with about 400 pairs of pelicans continuing to breed. No more than 30 individuals died there, and this happened later than in other colonies, in July 2021. The main version of the cause of birds’ mass death is the epizootic of avian influenza which was tested in all samples (n = 5) taken from a colony in Tyumen oblast. Pelicans live in dense flocks all year round, and this could really contribute to the rapid spread of the infection. The facts of the birds’ death in various nesting sites located on a large territory, at a great distance from one another, make it seem that they contracted the virus in wintering areas. However, a number of questions remain unanswered. In particular, it is unclear how the infected birds were able to travel thousands of kilometers to their breeding grounds, why individuals of only one particular species died, why only adults died, and why they died at different times. Maybe, the avian influenza virus tested in the birds’ bodies was low-pathogenic and was not the cause of their death, but it was due to some other factor, such as food poisoning. It might be that the immunity of the birds was weakened by the abnormal heat that came to the study area since mid-May 2021. If the birds died from a highly pathogenic virus, it is unclear why this did not happen immediately after infection (in the wintering areas), but in a long time, at least from May to July. Moreover, the infection with the virus did not prevent the birds from arriving at breeding sites, building nests, laying eggs and starting to incubate. However, influenza viruses are very diverse and continue to evolve rapidly changing their properties and increasing resistance to the environment. Our understanding of the ecological factors favoring emergence and sustainability of these viruses is still limited. More efforts should certainly be made to save such a globally rare species as the Dalmatian pelican. At the moment, a large breeding colony on the territory of Western Siberia (on Tundrovo Lake in the Okunevo Reserve (Tyumen oblast)) remains the main breeding ground of the species in this area. Therefore, the importance of preserving this breeding colony comes to the fore. The article contains 1 Table, 42 References. The Author declares no conflict of interest.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2021年乌拉尔和西伯利亚西部达尔马提亚鹈鹕Pelecanus crispus数量急剧减少
达尔马提亚鹈鹕(Pelecanus crispus, Bruch, 1832)是一种全球珍稀物种。它在筑巢期间极其局部(“点”)的位置,在几个难以到达的水体上,彼此之间距离很远,这使它成为一个非常脆弱的物种。在20世纪末,车里雅宾斯克州、库尔干州和秋明州的物种数量稳步增长。这主要是由于在全球气候变暖的背景下,个体从繁殖范围较南部的干燥水库重新分配到北部地区。因此,由于干旱,鹈鹕停止在斯维特林斯基保护区(奥伦堡州)筑巢。在2021年春季和夏季,在乌拉尔和西伯利亚西部发生了这些鸟类的第一次大规模死亡。利用大疆Mavic-2 Zoom无人机对车里雅宾斯克州、库尔干州和秋明州的7个种群进行观察,发现许多个体在越冬后的春季没有返回繁殖地,还有一部分个体在繁殖期高峰期死亡。结果,在一些种群中,鹈鹕的数量减少了70-80%;在其他地方,死鸟的比例更低,一些独立的殖民地几乎没有受到影响。同时,研究区西部(车里雅宾斯克州)有相当一部分个体在繁殖地外死亡,而东部主要在繁殖地死亡,死亡时间较晚。库尔干州5月发现鸟类死亡,秋明州6月发现鸟类死亡。研究区域的鹈鹕总数从1.2-1.4万对减少到约600对(见表)。六个殖民地被保留了下来;它们中的大多数现在最多有30-50对繁殖配偶。然而,在研究区域,最大的种群(也是秋明州最东端的Okunevo保护区)几乎完全存活下来,大约有400对鹈鹕继续繁殖。在2021年7月,那里的死亡人数不超过30人,这比其他殖民地晚。造成鸟类大规模死亡的主要原因是禽流感的动物流行病,在秋明州一个群体采集的所有样本(n = 5)中进行了检测。鹈鹕全年都生活在密集的群中,这可能会导致感染的迅速传播。这些鸟的死亡地点分布在大片领土上,彼此之间距离很远,这一事实表明,它们似乎是在越冬地区感染了这种病毒。然而,仍有许多问题没有得到解答。特别是,受感染的鸟类如何能够穿越数千公里到达它们的繁殖地,为什么只有一个特定物种的个体死亡,为什么只有成年鸟类死亡,以及为什么它们在不同的时间死亡,这些都是不清楚的。也许,在家禽体内检测的禽流感病毒是低致病性的,并不是导致它们死亡的原因,而是由于其他一些因素,如食物中毒。从2021年5月中旬开始,研究地区出现了异常高温,这可能导致鸟类免疫力下降。如果这些鸟死于高致病性病毒,目前尚不清楚为什么在感染后(在越冬地区)没有立即发生这种情况,而是在很长一段时间内,至少从5月到7月。此外,病毒感染并没有阻止这些鸟类到达繁殖地、筑巢、产卵并开始孵化。然而,流感病毒非常多样化,并继续迅速进化,改变其特性并增强对环境的抵抗力。我们对有利于这些病毒出现和可持续性的生态因素的了解仍然有限。当然应该做出更多的努力来拯救像达尔马提亚鹈鹕这样的全球稀有物种。目前,西伯利亚西部地区(秋明州奥库涅沃保护区的苔原湖)的一个大型繁殖地仍然是该地区该物种的主要繁殖地。因此,保护这个繁殖地的重要性就凸现出来了。本文包含1个表,42个参考文献。作者声明不存在利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Breeding biology of the common redstart Phoenicurus phoenicurus (L., 1758) in the south-east of Western Siberia Application of the Winter and Early-Spring Satellite Images for Assessment of the Birch Forest Coverage on the Abandoned Agricultural Lands Comparative Ecological and Geographical Analysis of the Anvils of the Great Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos major (Aves: Piciformes) in the North and South of the European Part of Russia Anatomical, Morphological, and Physiological Features of Cyanolichen Peltigera praetextata (Florke ex Sommerf.) Zopf Thalli in Different Ontogenetic States Physiological and biochemical adaptation indicators of the Azov sea roach Rutilus rutilus (L.) at various stages of its life cycle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1