Investigating the barriers and facilitators to implementing mental health first aid in the workplace: a qualitative study

M. Narayanasamy, L. Thomson, C. Coole, F. Nouri, A. Drummond
{"title":"Investigating the barriers and facilitators to implementing mental health first aid in the workplace: a qualitative study","authors":"M. Narayanasamy, L. Thomson, C. Coole, F. Nouri, A. Drummond","doi":"10.1108/jmhtep-12-2019-0064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThere has been little research into the use and efficacy of Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) across UK workplaces. This paper aims to investigate the implementation of MHFA across six UK organisations, identifying key barriers and facilitators.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nTwenty-seven workplace representatives were recruited from six organisations through purposive sampling and took part in semi-structured interviews exploring their experiences of workplace MHFA. The data underwent thematic analysis, identifying key themes around implementation.\n\n\nFindings\nImplementation varied across organisations, including different reasons for initial interest in the programme, and variable ways that MHFA-trained employees operated post-training. Key barriers to successful implementation included negative attitudes around mental health, the perception that MHFA roles were onerous, and employees’ reluctance to engage in the MHFA programme. Successful implementation was perceived to be based on individual qualities of MHFA instructors and good practice demonstrated by trained individuals in the workplace. The role of the inner organisational setting and employee characteristics were further highlighted as barriers and facilitators to effective implementation.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nMHFA is a complex intervention, presenting in different ways when implemented into complex workplace settings. As such, traditional evaluation methods may not be appropriate for gaining insights into its effectiveness. Future evaluations of workplace MHFA must consider the complexity of implementing and operationalising this intervention in the workplace.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study is the first to highlight the factors affecting successful implementation of MHFA across a range of UK workplaces.\n","PeriodicalId":75090,"journal":{"name":"The journal of mental health training, education, and practice","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of mental health training, education, and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmhtep-12-2019-0064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose There has been little research into the use and efficacy of Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) across UK workplaces. This paper aims to investigate the implementation of MHFA across six UK organisations, identifying key barriers and facilitators. Design/methodology/approach Twenty-seven workplace representatives were recruited from six organisations through purposive sampling and took part in semi-structured interviews exploring their experiences of workplace MHFA. The data underwent thematic analysis, identifying key themes around implementation. Findings Implementation varied across organisations, including different reasons for initial interest in the programme, and variable ways that MHFA-trained employees operated post-training. Key barriers to successful implementation included negative attitudes around mental health, the perception that MHFA roles were onerous, and employees’ reluctance to engage in the MHFA programme. Successful implementation was perceived to be based on individual qualities of MHFA instructors and good practice demonstrated by trained individuals in the workplace. The role of the inner organisational setting and employee characteristics were further highlighted as barriers and facilitators to effective implementation. Research limitations/implications MHFA is a complex intervention, presenting in different ways when implemented into complex workplace settings. As such, traditional evaluation methods may not be appropriate for gaining insights into its effectiveness. Future evaluations of workplace MHFA must consider the complexity of implementing and operationalising this intervention in the workplace. Originality/value This study is the first to highlight the factors affecting successful implementation of MHFA across a range of UK workplaces.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查在工作场所实施心理健康急救的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究
目的在英国的工作场所,很少有关于心理健康急救(MHFA)的使用和疗效的研究。本文旨在调查六个英国组织中MHFA的实施情况,确定关键障碍和促进因素。设计/方法/方法通过有目的的抽样,从六个组织中招募了27名工作场所代表,并参加了半结构化访谈,探讨了他们在工作场所MHFA的经历。对这些数据进行了专题分析,确定了围绕执行情况的关键主题。各个组织的实施情况各不相同,包括最初对该计划感兴趣的不同原因,以及mhfa培训的员工在培训后的不同操作方式。成功实施的主要障碍包括对心理健康的消极态度,认为MHFA的角色繁重,以及员工不愿参与MHFA计划。成功的实施被认为是基于MHFA教员的个人素质和工作场所受过培训的个人所展示的良好做法。进一步强调了组织内部环境和员工特征作为有效实施的障碍和促进因素的作用。研究局限/启示smhfa是一种复杂的干预措施,在复杂的工作场所环境中实施时表现出不同的方式。因此,传统的评估方法可能不适合深入了解其有效性。未来对工作场所MHFA的评估必须考虑在工作场所实施和操作这一干预措施的复杂性。原创性/价值这项研究首次强调了影响在英国工作场所成功实施MHFA的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mindful self-compassion training program in the family caregivers of patients with cancer: a quasi-experimental study Pedagogical considerations for enhancing peer support training in an online university environment Comparing the attitudes of junior doctors towards mental and physical ill-health: a survey of trainees in North London “Improved access, delayed accreditation, low recognition”: perspectives of mental health educators, preceptors and students on the Kintampo Project in Ghana Analysis and mapping of scientific literature on virtual and augmented reality technologies used in the context of mental health disorders (1980 – 2021)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1