Sex differences in central airway luminal area among people with interstitial lung disease

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY Physiology Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1152/physiol.2023.38.s1.5731276
A. Miller, Erik A. Ovrom, J. Senefeld, C. Wiggins, P. Dominelli, Michael J. Joyner, B. Welch, A. Ramsook
{"title":"Sex differences in central airway luminal area among people with interstitial lung disease","authors":"A. Miller, Erik A. Ovrom, J. Senefeld, C. Wiggins, P. Dominelli, Michael J. Joyner, B. Welch, A. Ramsook","doi":"10.1152/physiol.2023.38.s1.5731276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) encompasses several pulmonary disorders associated with scarring and fibrosis of pulmonary tissue. People with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, a subset of ILD, have greater central airway luminal area compared to age- and sex-matched healthy controls when evaluated using microcomputed tomography, a process examining the luminal area of ex-vivo lung tissue. In this study we aimed to confirm these findings using a different method of airway assessment, three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of computed tomography (CT) scans. Moreover, in health, males have larger central airways than height-matched females, but it remains unknown if there are sex differences in airway area among people with ILD. We hypothesized that sex differences observed in healthy people would persist among people with ILD. Methods: A cohort of 399 patients with lung CT scans were screened, of which 19 people (7 females) with ILD were included in analyses after exclusions. People with ILD were matched based on sex, age, and height to 19 healthy controls. We assessed cross-sectional luminal area at the midpoint of seven conducting airways (trachea, left and right main bronchus, intermediate bronchus, left and right upper lobe, and left lower lobe). Results from pulmonary function tests were also abstracted, as available. To examine sex differences, we compared airway luminal area, normalized to participant height, between males and females with ILD. Sex differences were analyzed using a univariate ANOVA test. Results: People with ILD had a preserved ratio of forced expiratory volume in the first second to forced vital capacity (101 ±12%predicted) and decreased diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (55 ±23%predicted). People with ILD had airways that were between 19.6%-45.0% larger than controls (p<0.05). Composite physiologic index, a marker of ILD severity, was not different between sexes (p=0.07). Males with ILD had significantly larger, luminal areas than females in two central airways - right main bronchus (1.46±0.41 vs. 1.07±0.22 mm2/cm, p=0.04) and left upper lobe (0.54±0.10 vs. 0.43±0.08 mm2/cm, p=0.02). However, luminal area of other central airways, including: trachea (2.15±0.57 vs. 1.65±0.32 mm2/cm, p=0.051), bronchus intermediate (0.77±0.23 vs. 0.61±0.13 mm2/cm, p=0.12), right upper lobe (0.47±0.15 vs. 0.40±0.06 mm2/cm, p=0.26), left main bronchus (0.93±0.33 vs. 0.69±0.16 mm2/cm, p=0.09), and left lower lobe (0.41±0.13 vs. 0.40±0.08 mm2 /cm, p=0.79) were not different between sexes in people with ILD. Conclusion: Sex differences observed in healthy people are potentially preserved in ILD, but a more robust sample is required to fully elucidate these findings. Illuminating any sex differences in ILD pathophysiology may provide knowledge to treat and improve clinical outcomes in ILD. Funding: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (F32HL154320 to JWS; 5R35HL139854 to MJJ). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.","PeriodicalId":49694,"journal":{"name":"Physiology","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/physiol.2023.38.s1.5731276","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) encompasses several pulmonary disorders associated with scarring and fibrosis of pulmonary tissue. People with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, a subset of ILD, have greater central airway luminal area compared to age- and sex-matched healthy controls when evaluated using microcomputed tomography, a process examining the luminal area of ex-vivo lung tissue. In this study we aimed to confirm these findings using a different method of airway assessment, three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of computed tomography (CT) scans. Moreover, in health, males have larger central airways than height-matched females, but it remains unknown if there are sex differences in airway area among people with ILD. We hypothesized that sex differences observed in healthy people would persist among people with ILD. Methods: A cohort of 399 patients with lung CT scans were screened, of which 19 people (7 females) with ILD were included in analyses after exclusions. People with ILD were matched based on sex, age, and height to 19 healthy controls. We assessed cross-sectional luminal area at the midpoint of seven conducting airways (trachea, left and right main bronchus, intermediate bronchus, left and right upper lobe, and left lower lobe). Results from pulmonary function tests were also abstracted, as available. To examine sex differences, we compared airway luminal area, normalized to participant height, between males and females with ILD. Sex differences were analyzed using a univariate ANOVA test. Results: People with ILD had a preserved ratio of forced expiratory volume in the first second to forced vital capacity (101 ±12%predicted) and decreased diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (55 ±23%predicted). People with ILD had airways that were between 19.6%-45.0% larger than controls (p<0.05). Composite physiologic index, a marker of ILD severity, was not different between sexes (p=0.07). Males with ILD had significantly larger, luminal areas than females in two central airways - right main bronchus (1.46±0.41 vs. 1.07±0.22 mm2/cm, p=0.04) and left upper lobe (0.54±0.10 vs. 0.43±0.08 mm2/cm, p=0.02). However, luminal area of other central airways, including: trachea (2.15±0.57 vs. 1.65±0.32 mm2/cm, p=0.051), bronchus intermediate (0.77±0.23 vs. 0.61±0.13 mm2/cm, p=0.12), right upper lobe (0.47±0.15 vs. 0.40±0.06 mm2/cm, p=0.26), left main bronchus (0.93±0.33 vs. 0.69±0.16 mm2/cm, p=0.09), and left lower lobe (0.41±0.13 vs. 0.40±0.08 mm2 /cm, p=0.79) were not different between sexes in people with ILD. Conclusion: Sex differences observed in healthy people are potentially preserved in ILD, but a more robust sample is required to fully elucidate these findings. Illuminating any sex differences in ILD pathophysiology may provide knowledge to treat and improve clinical outcomes in ILD. Funding: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (F32HL154320 to JWS; 5R35HL139854 to MJJ). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
间质性肺疾病患者中央气道管腔面积的性别差异
背景:间质性肺病(ILD)包括几种与肺组织瘢痕和纤维化相关的肺部疾病。当使用显微计算机断层扫描(一种检查离体肺组织管腔面积的方法)评估时,特发性肺纤维化患者(ILD的一个亚群)与年龄和性别匹配的健康对照组相比,具有更大的中央气道管腔面积。在这项研究中,我们旨在通过一种不同的气道评估方法,计算机断层扫描(CT)的三维(3D)重建来证实这些发现。此外,在健康情况下,男性比身高匹配的女性有更大的中央气道,但仍不清楚ILD患者的气道面积是否存在性别差异。我们假设在健康人群中观察到的性别差异将持续存在于ILD患者中。方法:筛选了399例肺部CT扫描患者,其中19例(7例女性)患有ILD,经排除后纳入分析。ILD患者根据性别、年龄和身高与19名健康对照进行匹配。我们评估了7条传导气道(气管、左右主支气管、中间支气管、左右上肺叶和左下肺叶)中点的横截面管腔面积。肺功能试验的结果也被提取出来。为了检查性别差异,我们比较了男性和女性ILD患者的气道管腔面积,并将其归一化为参与者的身高。性别差异分析采用单变量方差分析检验。结果:ILD患者第一秒用力呼气量与用力肺活量之比保持不变(预测为101±12%),一氧化碳弥散量下降(预测为55±23%)。ILD患者的气道比对照组大19.6%-45.0% (p<0.05)。综合生理指标是ILD严重程度的标志,性别间无差异(p=0.07)。男性ILD患者在两条中央气道——右主支气管(1.46±0.41比1.07±0.22 mm2/cm, p=0.04)和左上肺叶(0.54±0.10比0.43±0.08 mm2/cm, p=0.02)的管腔面积明显大于女性。然而,其他中心气道的管腔面积,包括:气管(2.15±0.57比1.65±0.32 mm2/cm, p=0.051)、支气管中间(0.77±0.23比0.61±0.13 mm2/cm, p=0.12)、右上肺叶(0.47±0.15比0.40±0.06 mm2/cm, p=0.26)、左主支气管(0.93±0.33比0.69±0.16 mm2/cm, p=0.09)、左下肺叶(0.41±0.13比0.40±0.08 mm2/cm, p=0.79)在ILD患者中无性别差异。结论:在健康人群中观察到的性别差异可能保留在ILD中,但需要更强大的样本来充分阐明这些发现。阐明ILD病理生理上的任何性别差异可能为ILD的治疗和改善临床结果提供知识。资助:国家心脏,肺和血液研究所(F32HL154320到JWS;5R35HL139854到MJJ)。这是在2023年美国生理学峰会上发表的完整摘要,仅以HTML格式提供。此摘要没有附加版本或附加内容。生理学没有参与同行评议过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physiology
Physiology 医学-生理学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Physiology journal features meticulously crafted review articles penned by esteemed leaders in their respective fields. These articles undergo rigorous peer review and showcase the forefront of cutting-edge advances across various domains of physiology. Our Editorial Board, comprised of distinguished leaders in the broad spectrum of physiology, convenes annually to deliberate and recommend pioneering topics for review articles, as well as select the most suitable scientists to author these articles. Join us in exploring the forefront of physiological research and innovation.
期刊最新文献
Charting the Molecular Terrain of Exercise: Energetics, Exerkines, and the Future of Multiomic Mapping. Buoyancy Regulation in Insects. Microtubule Reorganization and Quiescence: an Intertwined Relationship. mTORC1 and 2 Adrenergic Regulation and Function in Brown Adipose Tissue. Olfactory Development and Dysfunction: Involvement of Microglia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1