Science teachers' interactions with resources for formative assessment purposes.

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1007/s11092-022-09401-2
Ragnhild Lyngved Staberg, Maria Immaculata Maya Febri, Øistein Gjøvik, Svein Arne Sikko, Birgit Pepin
{"title":"Science teachers' interactions with resources for formative assessment purposes.","authors":"Ragnhild Lyngved Staberg,&nbsp;Maria Immaculata Maya Febri,&nbsp;Øistein Gjøvik,&nbsp;Svein Arne Sikko,&nbsp;Birgit Pepin","doi":"10.1007/s11092-022-09401-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using a case-study approach, we aim to understand how teachers interact with both analogue and digital resources in the science classroom for formative assessment (FA) purposes and their justifications for such interactions. The study was conducted in the context of a European Union project on FA in science and mathematics education. The case involved two Norwegian primary school teachers teaching their grades 5 and 7 students a series of science lessons on the topic \"how to prevent microorganisms from spreading.\" The data set consisted of lesson plans, classroom observations, pre- and post-interviews conducted with teachers, student tasks, post-interviews with students, and student work. We identified eight analogue and digital resources, which were used to employ five FA strategies. The strategies that were most commonly used related to \"engineering effective classroom discussions\" that elicited evidence of student understanding and \"activating students\" as autonomous learners and peer instructors. The teachers' rationales for using the selected resources were mainly connected to their effectiveness, practicality, and relevance. Teacher interactions with the selected resources are described, and educational implications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":46725,"journal":{"name":"Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability","volume":"35 1","pages":"5-35"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9628523/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-022-09401-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Using a case-study approach, we aim to understand how teachers interact with both analogue and digital resources in the science classroom for formative assessment (FA) purposes and their justifications for such interactions. The study was conducted in the context of a European Union project on FA in science and mathematics education. The case involved two Norwegian primary school teachers teaching their grades 5 and 7 students a series of science lessons on the topic "how to prevent microorganisms from spreading." The data set consisted of lesson plans, classroom observations, pre- and post-interviews conducted with teachers, student tasks, post-interviews with students, and student work. We identified eight analogue and digital resources, which were used to employ five FA strategies. The strategies that were most commonly used related to "engineering effective classroom discussions" that elicited evidence of student understanding and "activating students" as autonomous learners and peer instructors. The teachers' rationales for using the selected resources were mainly connected to their effectiveness, practicality, and relevance. Teacher interactions with the selected resources are described, and educational implications are discussed.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学教师与形成性评估资源的互动。
采用案例研究方法,我们旨在了解教师如何在科学课堂中与模拟和数字资源进行互动,以实现形成性评估(FA)的目的,以及他们进行这种互动的理由。这项研究是在欧盟关于科学和数学教育中的FA项目的背景下进行的。该案件涉及两名挪威小学教师,他们教五年级和七年级的学生一系列关于“如何防止微生物传播”的科学课程。数据集包括课程计划、课堂观察、教师访谈前后、学生任务、学生访谈后和学生作业。我们确定了八个模拟和数字资源,用于采用五种FA策略。最常用的策略与“工程有效的课堂讨论”有关,它引出了学生理解和“激活学生”作为自主学习者和同伴导师的证据。教师使用所选资源的理由主要与资源的有效性、实用性和相关性有关。描述了教师与选定资源的互动,并讨论了教育意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability
Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The main objective of this international journal is to advance knowledge and dissemination of research on and about assessment, evaluation and accountability of all kinds and on various levels as well as in all fields of education.  The journal provides readers with an understanding of the rich contextual nature of evaluation, assessment and accountability in education. The journal is theory-oriented and methodology-based and seeks to connect research, policy making and practice.  The journal publishes outstanding empirical works, peer-reviewed by eminent scholars around the world.Aims and Scope in more detail: The main objective of this international journal is to advance knowledge and dissemination of research on and about evaluation, assessment and accountability: - of all kinds (e.g. person, programme, organisation), - on various levels (state, regional, local), - in all fields of education (primary, secondary, higher education/tertiary, as well as non-school sector) and across all different life phases (e.g. adult education/andragogy/Human Resource Management/professional development).The journal provides readers with an understanding of the rich contextual nature of evaluation, assessment and accountability in education. The journal is theory-oriented and methodology-based and seeks to connect research, policy making and practice. Therefore, the journal explores and discusses: -       theories of evaluation, assessment and accountability, -       function, role, aims and purpose of evaluation, assessment and accountability, -       impact of evaluation, assessment and accountability, -       methodology, design and methods of evaluation, assessment and accountability, -       principles, standards and quality of evaluation, assessment and accountability, -       issues of planning, coordinating, conducting, reporting of evaluation, assessment and accountability.The journal also covers the quality of different instruments or procedures or approaches which are used for evaluation, assessment and accountability.The journal only includes research findings from evaluation, assessment and accountability, if the design or approach of it is meta-reflected in the article.The journal publishes outstanding empirical works, peer-reviewed by eminent scholars around the world.
期刊最新文献
IRTrees for skipping items in PIRLS How representative is the Swedish PISA sample? A comparison of PISA and register data Dimensions of teachers’ data literacy: A systematic review of literature from 1990 to 2021 Examining pre-service teachers’ feedback on low- and high-quality written assignments Legitimising capital: parent organisations and their resistance to testing in England
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1