Validation of Prognostic Club Cell Secretory Protein (CC16) Cut-point in an Independent ALTA Cohort.

IF 3.4 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Biomarker Insights Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11772719231156308
Sultan Almuntashiri, Aaron Chase, Andrea Sikora, Duo Zhang
{"title":"Validation of Prognostic Club Cell Secretory Protein (CC16) Cut-point in an Independent ALTA Cohort.","authors":"Sultan Almuntashiri,&nbsp;Aaron Chase,&nbsp;Andrea Sikora,&nbsp;Duo Zhang","doi":"10.1177/11772719231156308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Club cell secretory protein (CC16) has demonstrated utility as a lung-specific biomarker in predicting mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). These findings have been observed in pre-clinical trials and a re-analysis of a large, randomized controlled trial of ARDS (Fluid and Catheter Treatment Trial (FACTT)).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to validate previous findings by evaluating CC16 level as a mortality predictor in patients from the albuterol to treat acute lung injury (ALTA) trial.</p><p><strong>Design and method: </strong>In this secondary biomarker analysis, plasma CC16 level was measured from 100 ALTA subjects using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The rate of mortality was assessed in patients with high (⩾45 ng/mL) versus low CC16 (<45 ng/mL) levels. This cut-off level was applied based on our previous analysis from FACTT trial. Significance was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and a log-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subjects were an average of 50 years old and 46% of them were females. Patients with high CC16 levels had higher 90-day mortality compared to those with low CC16 levels, (37.73% vs 8.95%, <i>P</i> < .001). Other clinical outcomes including ICU-free days, ventilator-free days, and organ failure free days were significantly different between the groups (All <i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this validation study, we demonstrated that ARDS patients with high plasma CC16 concentration had a higher mortality rate than those with low CC16 levels, confirming previous findings that CC16 levels are associated with ARDS mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":47060,"journal":{"name":"Biomarker Insights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4b/71/10.1177_11772719231156308.PMC9940244.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomarker Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11772719231156308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Club cell secretory protein (CC16) has demonstrated utility as a lung-specific biomarker in predicting mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). These findings have been observed in pre-clinical trials and a re-analysis of a large, randomized controlled trial of ARDS (Fluid and Catheter Treatment Trial (FACTT)).

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to validate previous findings by evaluating CC16 level as a mortality predictor in patients from the albuterol to treat acute lung injury (ALTA) trial.

Design and method: In this secondary biomarker analysis, plasma CC16 level was measured from 100 ALTA subjects using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The rate of mortality was assessed in patients with high (⩾45 ng/mL) versus low CC16 (<45 ng/mL) levels. This cut-off level was applied based on our previous analysis from FACTT trial. Significance was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and a log-rank test.

Results: Subjects were an average of 50 years old and 46% of them were females. Patients with high CC16 levels had higher 90-day mortality compared to those with low CC16 levels, (37.73% vs 8.95%, P < .001). Other clinical outcomes including ICU-free days, ventilator-free days, and organ failure free days were significantly different between the groups (All P < .05).

Conclusion: In this validation study, we demonstrated that ARDS patients with high plasma CC16 concentration had a higher mortality rate than those with low CC16 levels, confirming previous findings that CC16 levels are associated with ARDS mortality.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
独立ALTA队列中预后俱乐部细胞分泌蛋白(CC16)切点的验证。
背景:俱乐部细胞分泌蛋白(CC16)已被证明是预测急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)死亡率的肺特异性生物标志物。这些发现已在临床前试验和对一项大型ARDS随机对照试验(液体和导管治疗试验(FACTT))的再分析中观察到。目的:本研究的目的是通过评估CC16水平作为沙丁胺醇治疗急性肺损伤(ALTA)试验患者死亡率预测因子来验证先前的研究结果。设计和方法:在这项二级生物标志物分析中,使用酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)测量了100名ALTA受试者的血浆CC16水平。在高(小于45 ng/mL)与低CC16的患者中评估死亡率(结果:受试者平均年龄为50岁,其中46%是女性)。结论:在本验证性研究中,我们证实血浆CC16浓度高的ARDS患者的死亡率高于血浆CC16浓度低的患者,证实了CC16水平与ARDS死亡率相关的先前研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomarker Insights
Biomarker Insights MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: An open access, peer reviewed electronic journal that covers all aspects of biomarker research and clinical applications.
期刊最新文献
Decreased Serum Insulin Receptor Messenger RNA Level in H. pylori IgG Seropositive Type 2 Diabetic Patients. Systematic Analysis and Insights Into the Mutation Spectrum and Ethnic Differences in ATP7B Mutations Associated With Wilson Disease. The Chromosome Passenger Complex (CPC) Components and Its Associated Pathways Are Promising Candidates to Differentiate Between Normosensitive and Radiosensitive ATM-Mutated Cells. D-dimer as a Predictive Biomarker of Response to Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer. Biomarkers From Discovery to Clinical Application: In Silico Pre-Clinical Validation Approach in the Face of Lung Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1