Legal aspects of parliamentary oversight in EU foreign and security policy

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW China-EU Law Journal Pub Date : 2018-07-27 DOI:10.4324/9781315178721-24
R. Wessel
{"title":"Legal aspects of parliamentary oversight in EU foreign and security policy","authors":"R. Wessel","doi":"10.4324/9781315178721-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For a long time, the relatively limited role of the European Parliament (EP) in relation to the European Union’s foreign, security and defence policy was not really an issue. Most Member States continued to see (or at least present)1 the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) as a policy area that has not developed beyond the intergovernmental European Political Cooperation of the 1970s and 1980s and oversight was believed to be in the safe hands of the national parliaments. Recent studies, however, revealed that these days CFSP is less to be seen as ‘the odd one out’, and that European integration (and even competence transfer) also took place in that policy field.2 Indeed, a less visible integration perhaps – as CFSP is much less used as a legal basis for policy-making than other external relations provisions – but nevertheless one that has changed the position of CFSP in the EU and hence the commitments of the Member States, the role of the institutions and the way the EU is perceived by other states in relation to its role in global governance.","PeriodicalId":29853,"journal":{"name":"China-EU Law Journal","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China-EU Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315178721-24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

For a long time, the relatively limited role of the European Parliament (EP) in relation to the European Union’s foreign, security and defence policy was not really an issue. Most Member States continued to see (or at least present)1 the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) as a policy area that has not developed beyond the intergovernmental European Political Cooperation of the 1970s and 1980s and oversight was believed to be in the safe hands of the national parliaments. Recent studies, however, revealed that these days CFSP is less to be seen as ‘the odd one out’, and that European integration (and even competence transfer) also took place in that policy field.2 Indeed, a less visible integration perhaps – as CFSP is much less used as a legal basis for policy-making than other external relations provisions – but nevertheless one that has changed the position of CFSP in the EU and hence the commitments of the Member States, the role of the institutions and the way the EU is perceived by other states in relation to its role in global governance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟外交和安全政策中议会监督的法律方面
很长一段时间以来,欧洲议会在欧盟外交、安全和防务政策方面的作用相对有限,这并不是一个真正的问题。大多数会员国继续认为(或至少现在认为)共同外交和安全政策是一个政策领域,它的发展尚未超越1970年代和1980年代的欧洲政府间政治合作,人们认为监督工作由各国议会安全负责。然而,最近的研究表明,这些天来,CFSP不太被视为“异类”,欧洲一体化(甚至能力转移)也发生在该政策领域事实上,这可能是一种不太明显的整合——因为与其他对外关系条款相比,欧盟安全政策很少被用作决策的法律基础——但它已经改变了欧盟安全政策在欧盟中的地位,从而改变了成员国的承诺、机构的作用以及其他国家对欧盟在全球治理中的作用的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Principles of EU law in climate litigation Climate adaptation law: a European perspective Correction: The evaluation of innovation in merger control: a comparison between China and other jurisdictions Special issue on competition law The evaluation of innovation in merger control: a comparison between china and other jurisdictions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1