Raising the Alarm on Brain Attacks in Surgical Patients: Are We Doing Enough to Prevent and Treat Postoperative Strokes?

L. Glance, R. Holloway
{"title":"Raising the Alarm on Brain Attacks in Surgical Patients: Are We Doing Enough to Prevent and Treat Postoperative Strokes?","authors":"L. Glance, R. Holloway","doi":"10.1097/01.sa.0000527523.87797.b0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This editorial provides an overview of the study by Christiansen et al, which demonstrates that a history of acute ischemic stroke within 3 months of emergency noncardiac, nonintracranial surgery significantly increased the risk of a postoperative stroke using data from the Danish National Patient Registry. The incidence of postoperative stroke was reported at 0.1% to 0.7%, with the risk declining as more time elapsed between the ischemic event and surgery. Despite the study limitations, this research by Christiansen et al on vulnerability to stroke after surgery supports the need for further research using different approaches and diverse populations to support the validation of the risk. Awareness of the risk of stroke, new neurologic deficits, and clear procedures with stroke teams and perioperative and surgical teams should be in place to ensure better patient outcomes. When undergoing elective surgery, especially in high-risk patients/ procedures, management must be done in close conjunction with stroke teams and comprehensive stroke centers where neuroendovascular specialists and advanced neuroimaging capabilities are readily available to ensure a better quality of care, as well as a better quality of life postprocedure. As of 2017, across America, there are 121 comprehensive stroke centers. When a specialized center is not readily accessible, a protocol to manage at-risk patients via technology, such as telestroke consultation, must be implemented. Currently, the guidelines for preventing postoperative stroke are provided by the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care consensus statement (supported but not endorsed by the American Society of Anesthesiologists). These guidelines have been minimally disseminated in comparison to the information from theAmerican StrokeAssociation. Because of the potential for severe impact on the life of a patient, surgical patients at risk of postoperative stroke must be managed with as much importance given to preventing a recurrent stroke as with dealing with the medical condition being treated.","PeriodicalId":22104,"journal":{"name":"Survey of Anesthesiology","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sa.0000527523.87797.b0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This editorial provides an overview of the study by Christiansen et al, which demonstrates that a history of acute ischemic stroke within 3 months of emergency noncardiac, nonintracranial surgery significantly increased the risk of a postoperative stroke using data from the Danish National Patient Registry. The incidence of postoperative stroke was reported at 0.1% to 0.7%, with the risk declining as more time elapsed between the ischemic event and surgery. Despite the study limitations, this research by Christiansen et al on vulnerability to stroke after surgery supports the need for further research using different approaches and diverse populations to support the validation of the risk. Awareness of the risk of stroke, new neurologic deficits, and clear procedures with stroke teams and perioperative and surgical teams should be in place to ensure better patient outcomes. When undergoing elective surgery, especially in high-risk patients/ procedures, management must be done in close conjunction with stroke teams and comprehensive stroke centers where neuroendovascular specialists and advanced neuroimaging capabilities are readily available to ensure a better quality of care, as well as a better quality of life postprocedure. As of 2017, across America, there are 121 comprehensive stroke centers. When a specialized center is not readily accessible, a protocol to manage at-risk patients via technology, such as telestroke consultation, must be implemented. Currently, the guidelines for preventing postoperative stroke are provided by the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care consensus statement (supported but not endorsed by the American Society of Anesthesiologists). These guidelines have been minimally disseminated in comparison to the information from theAmerican StrokeAssociation. Because of the potential for severe impact on the life of a patient, surgical patients at risk of postoperative stroke must be managed with as much importance given to preventing a recurrent stroke as with dealing with the medical condition being treated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
敲响外科患者脑梗死的警钟:我们在预防和治疗术后中风方面做得足够吗?
这篇社论概述了Christiansen等人的研究,该研究利用丹麦国家患者登记处的数据表明,紧急非心脏、非颅内手术后3个月内的急性缺血性卒中史显著增加了术后卒中的风险。据报道,术后卒中的发生率为0.1% - 0.7%,随着缺血事件和手术之间时间的延长,卒中风险下降。尽管研究存在局限性,但Christiansen等人关于手术后卒中易感性的研究表明,有必要使用不同的方法和不同的人群进行进一步的研究,以支持对风险的验证。卒中风险的认识、新的神经功能缺陷、卒中团队、围手术期和外科团队的明确程序应该到位,以确保更好的患者预后。当接受选择性手术时,特别是高风险患者/手术,必须与中风团队和综合中风中心密切合作,在这些中心,神经血管内专家和先进的神经成像能力随时可用,以确保更好的护理质量,以及手术后更好的生活质量。截至2017年,全美共有121家综合性中风中心。当一个专门的中心不容易到达时,必须实施一项协议,通过技术来管理高危患者,如远程卒中咨询。目前,预防术后卒中的指导方针是由麻醉和重症监护神经科学学会共识声明提供的(美国麻醉医师学会支持但不认可)。与美国中风协会的信息相比,这些指南的传播程度最低。由于可能对患者的生命造成严重影响,手术患者术后卒中风险的管理必须与处理正在治疗的医疗状况一样重视预防卒中复发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Context is king - obstetric anaesthesia management strategies in limited resource settings. Preoperative Administration of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers: Do We Have Enough “VISION” to Stop It? Implementing a Statistical Model for Protamine Titration: Effects on Coagulation in Cardiac Surgical Patients Vasopressin, Norepinephrine, and Vasodilatory Shock After Cardiac Surgery: Another “VASST” Difference? Prospective Double Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial of the Pectoral Nerves (Pecs) Block Type II
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1